On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:56:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
> > > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > >for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that
> > > >years ago bisection of a bug was a
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:20:10PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > But a bisect takes around 7 compiles.
> >...
>
> I don't understand that number.
>
> The common case are regressions in -rc1, and a bisection of
> at about 7000 commits takes around 13 compiles.
Worst case it would take 13. In
On 18-11-07 15:35, James Bottomley wrote:
clean-cg? But failure to run "git repack -a -d" every once in a while?
Actually, the best command is
git gc
which does a repack (into a single pack file rather than an incremenal),
and then removes all the objects now in the pack. If, like me, you
* Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > >for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that
> > >years ago bisection of a bug was a very laborous task
> > >so that it was only used as a final, last-ditch
> >
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 13:58 +0100, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 18-11-07 13:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
>
> >> It's a 540MByte download over a slow link for everyone
> >> else.
> >
> > Hmmm, clean-cg is 7.7G on my machine, and yes I tried
> >
On 18-11-07 13:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
It's a 540MByte download over a slow link for everyone
else.
Hmmm, clean-cg is 7.7G on my machine, and yes I tried
git-prune-packed. What am I doing wrong?
clean-cg? But failure to run "git repack -a -d"
On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that
> >years ago bisection of a bug was a very laborous task
> >so that it was only used as a final, last-ditch
> >approach for really nasty bugs. Today we can
>
On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that
years ago bisection of a bug was a very laborous task
so that it was only used as a final, last-ditch
approach for really nasty bugs. Today we can
autonomouly bisect
On 18-11-07 13:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
It's a 540MByte download over a slow link for everyone
else.
Hmmm, clean-cg is 7.7G on my machine, and yes I tried
git-prune-packed. What am I doing wrong?
clean-cg? But failure to run git repack -a -d
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 13:58 +0100, Rene Herman wrote:
On 18-11-07 13:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
It's a 540MByte download over a slow link for everyone
else.
Hmmm, clean-cg is 7.7G on my machine, and yes I tried
git-prune-packed. What am
* Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that
years ago bisection of a bug was a very laborous task
so that it was only used as a final, last-ditch
approach for really
On 18-11-07 15:35, James Bottomley wrote:
clean-cg? But failure to run git repack -a -d every once in a while?
Actually, the best command is
git gc
which does a repack (into a single pack file rather than an incremenal),
and then removes all the objects now in the pack. If, like me, you
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:20:10PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
But a bisect takes around 7 compiles.
...
I don't understand that number.
The common case are regressions in -rc1, and a bisection of
at about 7000 commits takes around 13 compiles.
Worst case it would take 13. In practice
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 03:56:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 2007-11-13 12:50:08, Mark Lord wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that
years ago bisection of a bug was a very laborous task
so
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:46:18PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:20:16PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> > Compared to getting useful suggestions from a mailing list, especially
> > before you've gotten anybody's attention? Hours or overnight isn't
> > particularly
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:46:18PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:20:16PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Compared to getting useful suggestions from a mailing list, especially
before you've gotten anybody's attention? Hours or overnight isn't
particularly long, and
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:20:16PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> Compared to getting useful suggestions from a mailing list, especially
> before you've gotten anybody's attention? Hours or overnight isn't
> particularly long, and doesn't take up much of your time if you've got a
> working
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote:
>
> (Cc: trimmed a bit).
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:19 -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> [...]
> > > A full kernel build with everything selected can take good 30 minutes or
> > > more, and that's on a
(Cc: trimmed a bit).
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:19 -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
[...]
> > A full kernel build with everything selected can take good 30 minutes or
> > more, and that's on a fast dual-core machine with 4gigs of memory and
> > 7200rpm
(Cc: trimmed a bit).
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:19 -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
[...]
A full kernel build with everything selected can take good 30 minutes or
more, and that's on a fast dual-core machine with 4gigs of memory and
7200rpm disk
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote:
(Cc: trimmed a bit).
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:19 -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
[...]
A full kernel build with everything selected can take good 30 minutes or
more, and that's on a fast dual-core
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:20:16PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Compared to getting useful suggestions from a mailing list, especially
before you've gotten anybody's attention? Hours or overnight isn't
particularly long, and doesn't take up much of your time if you've got a
working kernel
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:50:43PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> Virtual Folders.
>
> I use VM mode in EMACS, but I believe some other mail readers have the
> same functionality.
> I have a virtual folder called "nfs" which shows me all mail in my
> inbox which has the string 'nfs' or 'lockd' in a
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:34:37PM +, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:25:16PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Given the wide range of ARM platforms today, it is utterly idiotic to
> > > expect a single person to be able to provide responses for all ARM bugs.
> > > I for one wish
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:23:34PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> > I don't see any reason that we couldn't have a tool accessible to Ubuntu
> > users that does a real "git bisect". Git is really good at being scripted
> > by fancy GUIs. It should be
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:23:34PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> I don't see any reason that we couldn't have a tool accessible to Ubuntu
> users that does a real "git bisect". Git is really good at being scripted
> by fancy GUIs. It should be easy enough to have a drop down with all of
> the
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:23:34PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
I don't see any reason that we couldn't have a tool accessible to Ubuntu
users that does a real git bisect. Git is really good at being scripted
by fancy GUIs. It should be easy enough to have a drop down with all of
the
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:23:34PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
I don't see any reason that we couldn't have a tool accessible to Ubuntu
users that does a real git bisect. Git is really good at being scripted
by fancy GUIs. It should be easy
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:34:37PM +, Russell King wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:25:16PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Given the wide range of ARM platforms today, it is utterly idiotic to
expect a single person to be able to provide responses for all ARM bugs.
I for one wish I'd never
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:50:43PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
Virtual Folders.
I use VM mode in EMACS, but I believe some other mail readers have the
same functionality.
I have a virtual folder called nfs which shows me all mail in my
inbox which has the string 'nfs' or 'lockd' in a To, Cc,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> So even at 100% dirty limits, it won't let you dirty more than 1GB on the
> default 32-bit setup.
Side note: all of these are obviously still just heuristics. If you really
*do* run on a 32-bit kernel, and you want to have the pain, I'm sure you
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> So we've already been running those settings for a while. They didn't
> help.
Ok, so something else is up. If the mmap file is 2G, and you have 6G of
RAM, you shouldn't be hitting the dirty limits with those setups.
Of course, it may still be
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 08:24:53PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> >
> > And congratulations to him for that. We almost entirely dropped 2.6.16,
> > but there's a regression some time since then that makes large MMAPed
> > files a major pain
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:56:01PM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> There are a number of process things we _could_ do. Like
>> - have bugfix-only kernel releases
>
> Adrian Bunk does (did?) this with 2.6.16.x, although it always seemed to me
> like an
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> And congratulations to him for that. We almost entirely dropped 2.6.16,
> but there's a regression some time since then that makes large MMAPed
> files a major pain (specifically the dcc database clean takes about 5
> minutes on 2.6.16 and about 12
On Tuesday November 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007 07:08, Mark Lord wrote:
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ..
> >
> > > This is all QA-101 that _cannot be argued against on a rational basis_,
> > > it's just that these sorts of things have been largely ignored for
> > >
On Wednesday November 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:38:20AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > so please stop this "too busy and too noisy" nonsense already. It was
> > > nonsense 10 years ago and it's nonsense
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> There are two parts to this. One is a Ubuntu development kernel which
> we can give to large numbers of people to expand our testing pool.
> But if we don't do a better job of responding to bug reports that
> would be generated by expanded testing this
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Heikki Orsila wrote:
>
> See
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9321
>
> for more information.
That's a pretty unhelpful thing. It doesn't describe the breakage at all,
so there is hardly much "more info".
You've also apparently made all the
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:54:16AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Actually, I'm pretty happy reverting patches that cause regressions even
> if it *can* be "fixed for release". If there isn't a fix available within
> a day or two, it should get reverted.
> ...
> Also, please notice the latter
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> hi Matthew,
>
> On Wednesday 14 November 2007 06:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their
git tree. I did that and sent
hi Matthew,
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 06:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their
> >> git tree. I did that and sent patches back. No reply since then.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:37:37 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ok, then you conceded it by not replying to it? good ;-)
No, I don't intend to carry on this discussion,
but I appreciate the smiley.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Dumping even more crap on lkml is not the answer.
that "crap" that i'd like to see dumped upon lkml would be netdev
traffic mainly - most of the other kernel development lists (and i'm
subscribed to many of them) are low-traffic. netdev is the main
* James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 11:56 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
> >
> > > In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
> > > some of those bugs
* David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
>
> > In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
> > some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all
> > on lkml we'd
* Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:16:39 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > countered by the underlined sentences above, just in case you missed
> > it.
>
> I didn't miss your claim.
ok, then you conceded it by not replying to it? good ;-)
Ingo
-
To
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:16:39 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> countered by the underlined sentences above, just in case you missed it.
I didn't miss your claim.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
* Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > (and this is in no way directed at the networking folks - it holds
> > > > for all of us. I have one main complaint about
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 11:56 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
>
> > In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
> > some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all
> >
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:24:48PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Suspend to RAM resume hangs on a tickless (NO_HZ) kernel
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9275
> > > Kernel: 2.6.23
> > > This is HP notebook nc6320 T2400 945GM
> >
> > No response from developers
>
>
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
> In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
> some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all
> on lkml we'd all be aware of it.
That's a rediculious argument.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> Not if you said their regression causing patches will get reverted unless it
> can be fixed for release.
Actually, I'm pretty happy reverting patches that cause regressions even
if it *can* be "fixed for release". If there isn't a fix available
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:07:06AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:55:07 +
>
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:55:51PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > I've created [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > By doing so you've just said
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2007 00:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> You missed the following in my email:
>> "we slowly scare them away due to the many bug reports without any
>> reaction."
>>
>> The problem is that bug reports take time. If you go away from easy
>> things like
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:38:20AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > so please stop this "too busy and too noisy" nonsense already. It was
> > nonsense 10 years ago and it's nonsense today. In 10 years the kernel
> > grew from a 1 million
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > (and this is in no way directed at the networking folks - it holds
> > > for all of us. I have one main complaint about networking: the
> > > separate netdev list is a bad idea -
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
Btw, I used to test every -mm kernel. But since I've switched distros
(gentoo->ubuntu)
and I have less time, I feel it's harder to test -rc
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> You're assuming that everything in linux-2.6 was downloaded; that's
>>> not true. Everything in linux-2.6/.git was downloaded; but then you
>>> do a checkout which happens to approximately double the size of the
>>> linux-2.6
* Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You're assuming that everything in linux-2.6 was downloaded; that's
>> not true. Everything in linux-2.6/.git was downloaded; but then you
>> do a checkout which happens to approximately double the size of the
>> linux-2.6 directory.
> ..
>
> Ah, I
FWIW, I see the same problem with another HP notebook, DV4378EA with
radeon X700 video card. It does not happen frequently but I can say
that since I disabled the tickless feature I can't reproduce the
problem anymore.
On Nov 14, 2007 2:24 PM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > >
* Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (and this is in no way directed at the networking folks - it holds
> > for all of us. I have one main complaint about networking: the
> > separate netdev list is a bad idea - networking regressions should
> > be discussed and fixed on lkml, like
Hi!
> > Suspend to RAM resume hangs on a tickless (NO_HZ) kernel
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9275
> > Kernel: 2.6.23
> > This is HP notebook nc6320 T2400 945GM
>
> No response from developers
Maybe I'm optimistic, but I expected Ingo/Thomas to look after nohz
problems.
At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:21:30 +0100,
Rene Herman wrote:
>
> On 14-11-07 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:01:31 -0800 (PST),
> > David Miller wrote:
> >> From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:56:57 -0800 (PST)
> >>
> >>> The fact that it farts
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their
>> git tree. I did that and sent patches back. No reply since then.
>>
>> And mind you, the patch is not trying to do anything
>> complex, it mostly
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their
> git tree. I did that and sent patches back. No reply since then.
>
> And mind you, the patch is not trying to do anything
> complex, it mostly moves code around, removes
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > HID
> >
> > Kernel NULL pointer dereference at :usbhid:hiddev_ioctl+0x2f/0xabc
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9216
> > Kernel: 2.6.23.1
> > Looks like this is a
On 14-11-07 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:01:31 -0800 (PST),
David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:56:57 -0800 (PST)
The fact that it farts at me every time I post to this thread.
See? I got another one and I have received
At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:01:31 -0800 (PST),
David Miller wrote:
>
> From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:56:57 -0800 (PST)
>
> > The fact that it farts at me every time I post to this thread.
>
> See? I got another one and I have received at least 10 of the
>
From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:55:07 +
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:55:51PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > I've created [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> By doing so you've just said (implicitly) that you can not tolerate
> someone having a different opinion from your
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:55:51PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:32:01 -0800
>
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:18:01 + Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Find some other mailing list; I'm not hosting *nor* am I
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:27:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:55:51 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I've created [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Let me just say - I'm astonished at how little spam gets though the vger
> lists. Considering how many
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:27:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:55:51 -0800 (PST) David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've created [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me just say - I'm astonished at how little spam gets though the vger
lists. Considering how many times those
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:55:07 +
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:55:51PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
I've created [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By doing so you've just said (implicitly) that you can not tolerate
someone having a different opinion from your own.
I
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:55:51PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:32:01 -0800
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:18:01 + Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Find some other mailing list; I'm not hosting *nor* am I willing to run a
On 14-11-07 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:01:31 -0800 (PST),
David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:56:57 -0800 (PST)
The fact that it farts at me every time I post to this thread.
See? I got another one and I have received at
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
HID
Kernel NULL pointer dereference at :usbhid:hiddev_ioctl+0x2f/0xabc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9216
Kernel: 2.6.23.1
Looks like this is a regression
No
At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:01:31 -0800 (PST),
David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:56:57 -0800 (PST)
The fact that it farts at me every time I post to this thread.
See? I got another one and I have received at least 10 of the
following over
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their
git tree. I did that and sent patches back. No reply since then.
And mind you, the patch is not trying to do anything
complex, it mostly moves code around, removes
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their
git tree. I did that and sent patches back. No reply since then.
And mind you, the patch is not trying to do anything
complex, it mostly moves code
At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:21:30 +0100,
Rene Herman wrote:
On 14-11-07 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:01:31 -0800 (PST),
David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:56:57 -0800 (PST)
The fact that it farts at me every time I
Hi!
Suspend to RAM resume hangs on a tickless (NO_HZ) kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9275
Kernel: 2.6.23
This is HP notebook nc6320 T2400 945GM
No response from developers
Maybe I'm optimistic, but I expected Ingo/Thomas to look after nohz
problems. nohz=off
FWIW, I see the same problem with another HP notebook, DV4378EA with
radeon X700 video card. It does not happen frequently but I can say
that since I disabled the tickless feature I can't reproduce the
problem anymore.
On Nov 14, 2007 2:24 PM, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
* Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're assuming that everything in linux-2.6 was downloaded; that's
not true. Everything in linux-2.6/.git was downloaded; but then you
do a checkout which happens to approximately double the size of the
linux-2.6 directory.
..
Ah, I wondered why
* Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(and this is in no way directed at the networking folks - it holds
for all of us. I have one main complaint about networking: the
separate netdev list is a bad idea - networking regressions should
be discussed and fixed on lkml, like most other
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're assuming that everything in linux-2.6 was downloaded; that's
not true. Everything in linux-2.6/.git was downloaded; but then you
do a checkout which happens to approximately double the size of the
linux-2.6 directory.
..
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote:
Btw, I used to test every -mm kernel. But since I've switched distros
(gentoo-ubuntu)
and I have less time, I feel it's harder to test -rc
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(and this is in no way directed at the networking folks - it holds
for all of us. I have one main complaint about networking: the
separate netdev list is a bad idea - networking
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:38:20AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
so please stop this too busy and too noisy nonsense already. It was
nonsense 10 years ago and it's nonsense today. In 10 years the kernel
grew from a 1 million lines
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 00:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
You missed the following in my email:
we slowly scare them away due to the many bug reports without any
reaction.
The problem is that bug reports take time. If you go away from easy
things like compile errors
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:07:06AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:55:07 +
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:55:51PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
I've created [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By doing so you've just said (implicitly) that you can
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
Not if you said their regression causing patches will get reverted unless it
can be fixed for release.
Actually, I'm pretty happy reverting patches that cause regressions even
if it *can* be fixed for release. If there isn't a fix available within
a
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all
on lkml we'd all be aware of it.
That's a rediculious argument.
One
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:24:48PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Suspend to RAM resume hangs on a tickless (NO_HZ) kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9275
Kernel: 2.6.23
This is HP notebook nc6320 T2400 945GM
No response from developers
Maybe I'm optimistic,
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 11:56 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all
on lkml we'd
* Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(and this is in no way directed at the networking folks - it holds
for all of us. I have one main complaint about networking: the
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:16:39 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
countered by the underlined sentences above, just in case you missed it.
I didn't miss your claim.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
* Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:16:39 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
countered by the underlined sentences above, just in case you missed
it.
I didn't miss your claim.
ok, then you conceded it by not replying to it? good ;-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe
* David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all
on lkml we'd all be aware
* James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 11:56 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100
In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev
some of those bugs were already
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
