On 6/7/07, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:11 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> Your code now looks nice and clean. But I don't know what you want. I
> already spent lot of time on version 7 I posted and contains all those
> corrections which were suggested for my
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:11 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> Your code now looks nice and clean. But I don't know what you want. I
> already spent lot of time on version 7 I posted and contains all those
> corrections which were suggested for my earlier version. I cannot ask
> you to look into possible
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:26:32PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> +/* Which machines to allow unaligned accesses on */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
> +#define LZO_UNALIGNED_OK_2
> +#define LZO_UNALIGNED_OK_4
> +#endif
> +
This is silly, just use get/put_unaligned(). This
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:26:32PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
+/* Which machines to allow unaligned accesses on */
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
+#define LZO_UNALIGNED_OK_2
+#define LZO_UNALIGNED_OK_4
+#endif
+
This is silly, just use get/put_unaligned(). This same
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:11 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
Your code now looks nice and clean. But I don't know what you want. I
already spent lot of time on version 7 I posted and contains all those
corrections which were suggested for my earlier version. I cannot ask
you to look into possible
On 6/7/07, Richard Purdie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:11 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
Your code now looks nice and clean. But I don't know what you want. I
already spent lot of time on version 7 I posted and contains all those
corrections which were suggested for my earlier
On 6/6/07, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nitin: Have you any objections to this version? If not, I'll finish
analysing the PTR_ code changes and then hopefully we can get something
into -mm...
Your code now looks nice and clean. But I don't know what you want. I
already spent
On 6/6/07, Richard Purdie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Nitin: Have you any objections to this version? If not, I'll finish
analysing the PTR_ code changes and then hopefully we can get something
into -mm...
Your code now looks nice and clean. But I don't know what you want. I
already spent
8 matches
Mail list logo