On Fri, Apr 19, 2024, Will Deacon wrote:
> > @@ -663,10 +669,22 @@ static __always_inline kvm_mn_ret_t
> > __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> > break;
> > }
> > r.ret |= range->handler(kvm, _range);
> > +
> > +
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:53:26PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:03:51AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:54:22 +0100, Sean Christopherson
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:03:51AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:54:22 +0100, Sean Christopherson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:03:51AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:54:22 +0100, Sean Christopherson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:44:09 +0100, Will Deacon
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:54:22 +0100, Sean Christopherson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:44:09 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:58:12AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:54:22 +0100,
Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:44:09 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:58:12AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > Also, if you're in the business of hacking the MMU
On 11.04.24 18:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 3:56 PM Peter Xu wrote:
Paolo,
I may miss a bunch of details here (as I still remember some change_pte
patches previously on the list..), however not sure whether we considered
enable it? Asked because I remember Andrea used to
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:44:09 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:58:12AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Also, if you're in the business of hacking the MMU notifier code, it
> > would be really great to change the
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:44:09 +0100,
Will Deacon wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:58:12AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > index dc04bc767865..ff17849be9f4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:58:12AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index dc04bc767865..ff17849be9f4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1768,40 +1768,6 @@ bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 06:55:44PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 3:56 PM Peter Xu wrote:
> > Paolo,
> >
> > I may miss a bunch of details here (as I still remember some change_pte
> > patches previously on the list..), however not sure whether we considered
> > enable it?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 3:56 PM Peter Xu wrote:
> Paolo,
>
> I may miss a bunch of details here (as I still remember some change_pte
> patches previously on the list..), however not sure whether we considered
> enable it? Asked because I remember Andrea used to have a custom tree
> maintaining
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:58:12AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The .change_pte() MMU notifier callback was intended as an
> optimization. The original point of it was that KSM could tell KVM to flip
> its secondary PTE to a new location without having to first zap it. At
> the time there was
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> The .change_pte() MMU notifier callback was intended as an
> optimization. The original point of it was that KSM could tell KVM to flip
> its secondary PTE to a new location without having to first zap it. At
> the time there was also an .invalidate_page() callback; both
On 2024/4/5 下午7:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The .change_pte() MMU notifier callback was intended as an
optimization. The original point of it was that KSM could tell KVM to flip
its secondary PTE to a new location without having to first zap it. At
the time there was also an .invalidate_page()
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 5:28 PM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> The .change_pte() MMU notifier callback was intended as an
> optimization. The original point of it was that KSM could tell KVM to flip
> its secondary PTE to a new location without having to first zap it. At
> the time there was also an
16 matches
Mail list logo
