On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Miklos Szeredi
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi
>>> wrote:
>>
+ /*
+* These
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
>>> + /*
>>> +* These should be
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
>>> + /*
>>> +* These should be intercepted, but they are very unlikely
>>> to be
>>> +
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> + /*
>> +* These should be intercepted, but they are very unlikely
>> to be
>> +* a
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> + /*
>> +* These should be intercepted, but they are very unlikely
>> to be
>> +* a problem in practice. Leave them alone for now.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Overlayfs needs to intercept a few file operations in order to properly
> handle the following corner case:
>
> - file X is in overlayfs;
>
> - X resides on a lower (read-only) layer
> the lower file is L;
>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Overlayfs needs to intercept a few file operations in order to properly
> handle the following corner case:
>
> - file X is in overlayfs;
>
> - X resides on a lower (read-only) layer
> the lower file is L;
>
> - X is opened with
12 matches
Mail list logo