Re: [PATCH v16 00/17] KVM RISC-V Support

2021-04-09 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 02:21:58 PDT (-0700), pbonz...@redhat.com wrote: On 30/03/21 07:48, Anup Patel wrote: It seems Andrew does not want to freeze H-extension until we have virtualization aware interrupt controller (such as RISC-V AIA specification) and IOMMU. Lot of us feel that these things

Re: [PATCH v16 00/17] KVM RISC-V Support

2021-04-01 Thread Anup Patel
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:52 PM Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 30/03/21 07:48, Anup Patel wrote: > > > > It seems Andrew does not want to freeze H-extension until we have > > virtualization > > aware interrupt controller (such as RISC-V AIA specification) and IOMMU. Lot > > of us feel that these

Re: [PATCH v16 00/17] KVM RISC-V Support

2021-03-31 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 30/03/21 07:48, Anup Patel wrote: It seems Andrew does not want to freeze H-extension until we have virtualization aware interrupt controller (such as RISC-V AIA specification) and IOMMU. Lot of us feel that these things can be done independently because RISC-V H-extension already has

Re: [PATCH v16 00/17] KVM RISC-V Support

2021-03-29 Thread Anup Patel
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 9:10 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 04:18:29 PST (-0800), Anup Patel wrote: > > This series adds initial KVM RISC-V support. Currently, we are able to boot > > Linux on RV64/RV32 Guest with multiple VCPUs. > > Thanks. IIUC the spec is still in limbo at

Re: [PATCH v16 00/17] KVM RISC-V Support

2021-01-22 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 04:18:29 PST (-0800), Anup Patel wrote: This series adds initial KVM RISC-V support. Currently, we are able to boot Linux on RV64/RV32 Guest with multiple VCPUs. Thanks. IIUC the spec is still in limbo at the RISC-V foundation? I haven't really been paying attention