Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 07:01:40PM +0800, Yong wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:50:47 +0100
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > Hi Yong,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:45:11PM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > I just noticed that you are using the
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 07:01:40PM +0800, Yong wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:50:47 +0100
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > Hi Yong,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:45:11PM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > I just noticed that you are using the second iteration?
> > > Have you
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:50:47 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:45:11PM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > I just noticed that you are using the second iteration?
> > Have you received my third iteration?
>
> Sorry for the
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:50:47 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:45:11PM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > I just noticed that you are using the second iteration?
> > Have you received my third iteration?
>
> Sorry for the late reply, and for not coming back
Hi Yong,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:45:11PM +0800, Yong wrote:
> I just noticed that you are using the second iteration?
> Have you received my third iteration?
Sorry for the late reply, and for not coming back to you yet about
that test. No, this is still in your v2. I've definitely received
Hi Yong,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:45:11PM +0800, Yong wrote:
> I just noticed that you are using the second iteration?
> Have you received my third iteration?
Sorry for the late reply, and for not coming back to you yet about
that test. No, this is still in your v2. I've definitely received
Hi Maxime,
I just noticed that you are using the second iteration?
Have you received my third iteration?
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 17:02:33 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:14:44AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:33:06AM
Hi Maxime,
I just noticed that you are using the second iteration?
Have you received my third iteration?
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 17:02:33 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:14:44AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:33:06AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > > On Thu,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:14:44AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:33:06AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > > > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > > > > and CSI1 is used for
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:14:44AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:33:06AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > > > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > > > > and CSI1 is used for
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:45:26 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:33:06AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:45:26 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:33:06AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > > > and CSI1 is used
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:33:06AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > > and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This is not documented in
> > > datasheet but by
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:33:06AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > > and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This is not documented in
> > > datasheet but by
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:48:27 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This is not
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:48:27 +0100
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This is not documented in
> > datasheet but by
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This is not documented in
> datasheet but by testing and guess.
>
> This patch implement a v4l2 framework driver for
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This is not documented in
> datasheet but by testing and guess.
>
> This patch implement a v4l2 framework driver for
Hello Mylène,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:44:13 +0200
Mylene JOSSERAND wrote:
> Hello Yong,
>
> Thank you for these drivers!
>
> I tested it with an OV5640 camera on an Nanopi M1 plus (Allwinner H3)
> and I noticed that I got a frame correctly displayed only on
Hello Mylène,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:44:13 +0200
Mylene JOSSERAND wrote:
> Hello Yong,
>
> Thank you for these drivers!
>
> I tested it with an OV5640 camera on an Nanopi M1 plus (Allwinner H3)
> and I noticed that I got a frame correctly displayed only on a half of
> the frame's size.
>
>
Hello Yong,
Thank you for these drivers!
I tested it with an OV5640 camera on an Nanopi M1 plus (Allwinner H3)
and I noticed that I got a frame correctly displayed only on a half of
the frame's size.
It is related to your "sun6i_csi_set_window" function (see
below).
> Allwinner V3s SoC have
Hello Yong,
Thank you for these drivers!
I tested it with an OV5640 camera on an Nanopi M1 plus (Allwinner H3)
and I noticed that I got a frame correctly displayed only on a half of
the frame's size.
It is related to your "sun6i_csi_set_window" function (see
below).
> Allwinner V3s SoC have
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:41:14 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:32:16AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > > > +static int sun6i_graph_notify_complete(struct v4l2_async_notifier
> > > > > > *notifier)
> > > > > > +{
> > >
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:41:14 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:32:16AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > > > +static int sun6i_graph_notify_complete(struct v4l2_async_notifier
> > > > > > *notifier)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct sun6i_csi *csi =
Hi Yong,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:32:16AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > > +static int sun6i_graph_notify_complete(struct v4l2_async_notifier
> > > > > *notifier)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct sun6i_csi *csi =
> > > > > + container_of(notifier, struct sun6i_csi,
> > > >
Hi Yong,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:32:16AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > > +static int sun6i_graph_notify_complete(struct v4l2_async_notifier
> > > > > *notifier)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct sun6i_csi *csi =
> > > > > + container_of(notifier, struct sun6i_csi,
> > > >
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:24:13 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:41:18AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > > > +static irqreturn_t sun6i_csi_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev = (struct sun6i_csi_dev
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:24:13 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:41:18AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > > > +static irqreturn_t sun6i_csi_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev = (struct sun6i_csi_dev *)dev_id;
> > > > > > + struct
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:41:18AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > > +static irqreturn_t sun6i_csi_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev = (struct sun6i_csi_dev *)dev_id;
> > > > > + struct regmap *regmap = sdev->regmap;
> > > > > + u32 status;
> > >
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:41:18AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > > +static irqreturn_t sun6i_csi_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev = (struct sun6i_csi_dev *)dev_id;
> > > > > + struct regmap *regmap = sdev->regmap;
> > > > > + u32 status;
> > >
在 2017-08-23 15:43,Laurent Pinchart 写道:
Hi Hans,
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 09:52:00 EEST Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 08/22/2017 10:17 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
在 2017-08-23 15:43,Laurent Pinchart 写道:
Hi Hans,
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 09:52:00 EEST Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 08/22/2017 10:17 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
Hi Hans,
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 09:52:00 EEST Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/22/2017 10:17 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
> > +
Hi Hans,
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 09:52:00 EEST Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/22/2017 10:17 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
> > +
On 08/22/2017 10:17 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
> + const struct media_pad *local,
> + const struct
On 08/22/2017 10:17 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
> + const struct media_pad *local,
> + const struct
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:21:45 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Baruch,
>
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:08:01AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the second iteration!
>
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:21:45 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Baruch,
>
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:08:01AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the second iteration!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:43:39 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:16:40AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ source "drivers/media/platform/am437x/Kconfig"
> > > > source "drivers/media/platform/xilinx/Kconfig"
> > >
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:43:39 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:16:40AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ source "drivers/media/platform/am437x/Kconfig"
> > > > source "drivers/media/platform/xilinx/Kconfig"
> > > > source
Hello,
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 23:17:31 EEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
> + const struct media_pad *local,
> +
Hello,
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 23:17:31 EEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
> + const struct media_pad *local,
> +
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
> >>> + const struct media_pad *local,
> >>> + const struct media_pad *remote, u32 flags)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:43:35AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> +static int sun6i_video_link_setup(struct media_entity *entity,
> >>> + const struct media_pad *local,
> >>> + const struct media_pad *remote, u32 flags)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct
Hi Yong,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:16:40AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ source "drivers/media/platform/am437x/Kconfig"
> > > source "drivers/media/platform/xilinx/Kconfig"
> > > source "drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/Kconfig"
> > > source
Hi Yong,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:16:40AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ source "drivers/media/platform/am437x/Kconfig"
> > > source "drivers/media/platform/xilinx/Kconfig"
> > > source "drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/Kconfig"
> > > source
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:43:35 +0200
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/22/2017 05:01 AM, Yong wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:37:41 +0200
> > Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Yong,
> >>
> >> First two high-level comments before I start the
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:43:35 +0200
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 08/22/2017 05:01 AM, Yong wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:37:41 +0200
> > Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Yong,
> >>
> >> First two high-level comments before I start the review:
> >>
> >> 1) Can you provide the
On 08/22/2017 05:01 AM, Yong wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:37:41 +0200
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> Hi Yong,
>>
>> First two high-level comments before I start the review:
>>
>> 1) Can you provide the v4l2-compliance output? I can't merge this unless I
>>see
On 08/22/2017 05:01 AM, Yong wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:37:41 +0200
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> Hi Yong,
>>
>> First two high-level comments before I start the review:
>>
>> 1) Can you provide the v4l2-compliance output? I can't merge this unless I
>>see that it passes the
Hi Hans,
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:37:41 +0200
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> First two high-level comments before I start the review:
>
> 1) Can you provide the v4l2-compliance output? I can't merge this unless I
>see that it passes the compliance tests. Make sure
Hi Hans,
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:37:41 +0200
Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> First two high-level comments before I start the review:
>
> 1) Can you provide the v4l2-compliance output? I can't merge this unless I
>see that it passes the compliance tests. Make sure you compile from the
Hi Baruch,
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:08:01AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the second iteration!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI
Hi Baruch,
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:08:01AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the second iteration!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI
Hi Yong,
First two high-level comments before I start the review:
1) Can you provide the v4l2-compliance output? I can't merge this unless I
see that it passes the compliance tests. Make sure you compile from the git
repo (https://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git/) so you are using the latest
Hi Yong,
First two high-level comments before I start the review:
1) Can you provide the v4l2-compliance output? I can't merge this unless I
see that it passes the compliance tests. Make sure you compile from the git
repo (https://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git/) so you are using the latest
Hi Yong,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:48:06AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:08:01 +0300
> Baruch Siach wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > > +
Hi Yong,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:48:06AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:08:01 +0300
> Baruch Siach wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > > + regmap_write(sdev->regmap,
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 18:02:33 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the second iteration!
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > and CSI1 is
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 18:02:33 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the second iteration!
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This
Hi,
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:08:01 +0300
Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Maxime, Yong,
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the second iteration!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > >
Hi,
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:08:01 +0300
Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Maxime, Yong,
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the second iteration!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > Allwinner V3s SoC have
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:25:51 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:16:44PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Hi Yong,
> >
> > I managed to get the Frame Done interrupt with the previous version of this
> > driver on the A33 OLinuXino. No data
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:25:51 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:16:44PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Hi Yong,
> >
> > I managed to get the Frame Done interrupt with the previous version of this
> > driver on the A33 OLinuXino. No data yet (all zeros). I'm still working
Hi Maxime, Yong,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the second iteration!
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > and CSI1 is used for parallel
Hi Maxime, Yong,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the second iteration!
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> > and CSI1 is used for parallel
Hi,
Thanks for the second iteration!
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This is not documented in
> datasheet but by testing and guess.
>
> This patch
Hi,
Thanks for the second iteration!
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is used for MIPI interface
> and CSI1 is used for parallel interface. This is not documented in
> datasheet but by testing and guess.
>
> This patch
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:16:44PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> I managed to get the Frame Done interrupt with the previous version of this
> driver on the A33 OLinuXino. No data yet (all zeros). I'm still working on it.
>
> One comment below.
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:16:44PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> I managed to get the Frame Done interrupt with the previous version of this
> driver on the A33 OLinuXino. No data yet (all zeros). I'm still working on it.
>
> One comment below.
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at
Hi Yong,
I managed to get the Frame Done interrupt with the previous version of this
driver on the A33 OLinuXino. No data yet (all zeros). I'm still working on it.
One comment below.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is
Hi Yong,
I managed to get the Frame Done interrupt with the previous version of this
driver on the A33 OLinuXino. No data yet (all zeros). I'm still working on it.
One comment below.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:01:35PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> Allwinner V3s SoC have two CSI module. CSI0 is
72 matches
Mail list logo