On di, 2016-06-07 at 21:16 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 20:10 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > > Is it obvious that a Kconfig has "default n" ?
> > > This seems to work, but is this useful?
>
> While sending patch for upstream, I saw maintainers request it to be
> removed. So
Hi,
Thanks for the review.
On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 20:10 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:43:15AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 13:10 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > > If a Kconfig config option doesn't specify 'default', the default
> > > will be n.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:43:15AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 13:10 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > If a Kconfig config option doesn't specify 'default', the default
> > will be n. Adding 'default n' is unnecessary.
> > Add a test to warn about this.
>
> Is it obvious that a
On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 13:10 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> If a Kconfig config option doesn't specify 'default', the default
> will be n. Adding 'default n' is unnecessary.
> Add a test to warn about this.
Is it obvious that a Kconfig has "default n" ?
This seems to work, but is this useful?
> Sign
4 matches
Mail list logo
