Applied to cgroup/for-3.17.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Applied to cgroup/for-3.17.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:03:06PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, guys.
>
> Currently, the blkio subsystem attributes all of writeback IOs to the
> root. One of the issues is that there's no way to tell who originated
> a writeback IO from block layer. Those IOs are usually issued
>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:03:06PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, guys.
Currently, the blkio subsystem attributes all of writeback IOs to the
root. One of the issues is that there's no way to tell who originated
a writeback IO from block layer. Those IOs are usually issued
asynchronously
Hi Tejun,
On 2014/6/28 9:03, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, guys.
>
> Currently, the blkio subsystem attributes all of writeback IOs to the
> root. One of the issues is that there's no way to tell who originated
> a writeback IO from block layer. Those IOs are usually issued
> asynchronously from a
Hi Tejun,
On 2014/6/28 9:03, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, guys.
Currently, the blkio subsystem attributes all of writeback IOs to the
root. One of the issues is that there's no way to tell who originated
a writeback IO from block layer. Those IOs are usually issued
asynchronously from a task
6 matches
Mail list logo