Re: [RFC] COLO Proxy Module

2015-07-01 Thread Wen Congyang
On 06/30/2015 05:19 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote: > On 30.06, Li Zhijian wrote: >> |ping... >> >> and i have another question: >> can i add a new |||nf_ct_ext_id simply without touching the exiting kernel >> code?| > > No, the kernel needs to know the highest extension ID in order to > allocate

Re: [RFC] COLO Proxy Module

2015-07-01 Thread Wen Congyang
On 06/30/2015 05:19 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote: On 30.06, Li Zhijian wrote: |ping... and i have another question: can i add a new |||nf_ct_ext_id simply without touching the exiting kernel code?| No, the kernel needs to know the highest extension ID in order to allocate space for the

Re: [RFC] COLO Proxy Module

2015-06-30 Thread Patrick McHardy
On 30.06, Li Zhijian wrote: > |ping... > > and i have another question: > can i add a new |||nf_ct_ext_id simply without touching the exiting kernel > code?| No, the kernel needs to know the highest extension ID in order to allocate space for the offsets. > in order to support COLO-Proxy, i

Re: [RFC] COLO Proxy Module

2015-06-30 Thread Patrick McHardy
On 30.06, Li Zhijian wrote: |ping... and i have another question: can i add a new |||nf_ct_ext_id simply without touching the exiting kernel code?| No, the kernel needs to know the highest extension ID in order to allocate space for the offsets. in order to support COLO-Proxy, i need a