On Tuesday 26 March 2013 21:53:19 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > CCing Aaro and Tony. Look at this thread on:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/16/152
> >
> > What do you think how to fix this problem? I do not know
> > about any HW
On Tuesday 26 March 2013 21:53:19 Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
CCing Aaro and Tony. Look at this thread on:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/16/152
What do you think how to fix this problem? I do not know
about any HW regulator for
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:53:19PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> From: Aaro Koskinen
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:34:22 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: RX-51: add missing regulator supply definitions for
> lis3lv02d
>
> Add missing regulator definitions for lis3lv02d accelerometer. Fixes
> the
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> CCing Aaro and Tony. Look at this thread on:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/16/152
>
> What do you think how to fix this problem? I do not know about any
> HW regulator for n900 accelerometer and possible solutions could
> be
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 09:08:08AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This is a regression, and it needs to be fixed. The "device needs
This isn't a regression, the commit they're complaining about (ec400c)
was added in October 2011 with a note about all the in-tree users having
been looked after
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
>> What do you think how to fix this problem? I do not know about any
>> HW regulator for n900 accelerometer and possible solutions could
>> be revert that commit or adding fake
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> What do you think how to fix this problem? I do not know about any
> HW regulator for n900 accelerometer and possible solutions could
> be revert that commit or adding fake regulator to board code...
Reverting the fix is not an
On Monday 25 March 2013 00:04:37 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:44:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 March 2013 23:14:46 Mark Brown wrote:
> > > Well, you should seek support from the board vendor then.
> >
> > Not possible. Nokia is already using Windows Phones and
On Monday 25 March 2013 00:04:37 Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:44:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 24 March 2013 23:14:46 Mark Brown wrote:
Well, you should seek support from the board vendor then.
Not possible. Nokia is already using Windows Phones and life
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
What do you think how to fix this problem? I do not know about any
HW regulator for n900 accelerometer and possible solutions could
be revert that commit or adding fake regulator to board code...
Reverting the fix is not an option,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
What do you think how to fix this problem? I do not know about any
HW regulator for n900 accelerometer and possible solutions could
be revert that
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 09:08:08AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
This is a regression, and it needs to be fixed. The device needs
This isn't a regression, the commit they're complaining about (ec400c)
was added in October 2011 with a note about all the in-tree users having
been looked after and
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
CCing Aaro and Tony. Look at this thread on:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/16/152
What do you think how to fix this problem? I do not know about any
HW regulator for n900 accelerometer and possible solutions could
be revert
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:53:19PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
From: Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:34:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: RX-51: add missing regulator supply definitions for
lis3lv02d
Add missing regulator definitions for lis3lv02d accelerometer.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:44:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 24 March 2013 23:14:46 Mark Brown wrote:
> > Well, you should seek support from the board vendor then.
> Not possible. Nokia is already using Windows Phones and life
> cycle for Nokia N900 phone is at the end. And Nokia
On Sunday 24 March 2013 23:14:46 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:27:32PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 March 2013 22:21:49 Mark Brown wrote:
> > > You need to look at the schematics rather than the code
> > > here - the code just needs to say what regulator supplies
> >
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:27:32PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 24 March 2013 22:21:49 Mark Brown wrote:
> > You need to look at the schematics rather than the code here -
> > the code just needs to say what regulator supplies Vdd on the
> > device.
> This is problem, there is no info
On Sunday 24 March 2013 22:21:49 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > There is no regulator 'Vdd' supply in board rx51 files. Can
> > you look at code how it can be fixed?
>
> You need to look at the schematics rather than the code here -
> the code
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> There is no regulator 'Vdd' supply in board rx51 files. Can you
> look at code how it can be fixed?
You need to look at the schematics rather than the code here - the code
just needs to say what regulator supplies Vdd on the device.
On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:17:59 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:40:41PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > $ dmesg | grep lis3
> > [ 110.454345] lis3lv02d_i2c 3-001d: Failed to get supply
> > 'Vdd': -517 [ 110.457397] i2c 3-001d: Driver lis3lv02d_i2c
> > requests probe deferral [
On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:17:59 Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:40:41PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
$ dmesg | grep lis3
[ 110.454345] lis3lv02d_i2c 3-001d: Failed to get supply
'Vdd': -517 [ 110.457397] i2c 3-001d: Driver lis3lv02d_i2c
requests probe deferral [
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
There is no regulator 'Vdd' supply in board rx51 files. Can you
look at code how it can be fixed?
You need to look at the schematics rather than the code here - the code
just needs to say what regulator supplies Vdd on the device.
On Sunday 24 March 2013 22:21:49 Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
There is no regulator 'Vdd' supply in board rx51 files. Can
you look at code how it can be fixed?
You need to look at the schematics rather than the code here -
the code just
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:27:32PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 24 March 2013 22:21:49 Mark Brown wrote:
You need to look at the schematics rather than the code here -
the code just needs to say what regulator supplies Vdd on the
device.
This is problem, there is no info about
On Sunday 24 March 2013 23:14:46 Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:27:32PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 24 March 2013 22:21:49 Mark Brown wrote:
You need to look at the schematics rather than the code
here - the code just needs to say what regulator supplies
Vdd on the
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:44:59PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 24 March 2013 23:14:46 Mark Brown wrote:
Well, you should seek support from the board vendor then.
Not possible. Nokia is already using Windows Phones and life
cycle for Nokia N900 phone is at the end. And Nokia never
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:40:41PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> $ dmesg | grep lis3
> [ 110.454345] lis3lv02d_i2c 3-001d: Failed to get supply 'Vdd': -517
> [ 110.457397] i2c 3-001d: Driver lis3lv02d_i2c requests probe deferral
> [ 111.507415] lis3lv02d_i2c 3-001d: Failed to get supply 'Vdd':
On Sunday 17 February 2013 17:25:24 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:46:25AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Accelerometer driver lis3lv02d_i2c not working on Nokia
> > RX-51 with linux kernel 3.8-rc3. Probing for i2c device
> > failing.
> >
> > I tried to compile older version and it
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:46:25AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Accelerometer driver lis3lv02d_i2c not working on Nokia RX-51
> with linux kernel 3.8-rc3. Probing for i2c device failing.
> I tried to compile older version and it working without problem.
> Then I bisected commit which broke
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:46:25AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Accelerometer driver lis3lv02d_i2c not working on Nokia RX-51
with linux kernel 3.8-rc3. Probing for i2c device failing.
I tried to compile older version and it working without problem.
Then I bisected commit which broke support
On Sunday 17 February 2013 17:25:24 Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:46:25AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Accelerometer driver lis3lv02d_i2c not working on Nokia
RX-51 with linux kernel 3.8-rc3. Probing for i2c device
failing.
I tried to compile older version and it working
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:40:41PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
$ dmesg | grep lis3
[ 110.454345] lis3lv02d_i2c 3-001d: Failed to get supply 'Vdd': -517
[ 110.457397] i2c 3-001d: Driver lis3lv02d_i2c requests probe deferral
[ 111.507415] lis3lv02d_i2c 3-001d: Failed to get supply 'Vdd': -517
32 matches
Mail list logo
