Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-10-02 Thread Pavel Machek
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 18:37 +, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > That's a bit tricky because hitting the keyboard is what unsticks things. > > > And the video is black after resume-from-RAM (has always been thus) and we > > > > Ok, can we try to fix the video issue for you? That should make the >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-10-02 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 18:37 +, Pavel Machek wrote: That's a bit tricky because hitting the keyboard is what unsticks things. And the video is black after resume-from-RAM (has always been thus) and we Ok, can we try to fix the video issue for you? That should make the development

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 22 September 2007 10:50, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 18:37 +, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > That's a bit tricky because hitting the keyboard is what unsticks things. > > > And the video is black after resume-from-RAM (has always been thus) and we > > > > Ok, can

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-22 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 18:37 +, Pavel Machek wrote: > > That's a bit tricky because hitting the keyboard is what unsticks things. > > And the video is black after resume-from-RAM (has always been thus) and we > > Ok, can we try to fix the video issue for you? That should make the >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-22 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Ok, here we are. The bad one uses C2 which stops the local apic on the > > VAIO. I suspect we end up in the suspend/resume with going into C2 > > without the broadcast active. > > > > Can you try to get the output of SysRq-Q during the "it needs help from > > keyboard" period ? > > > >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-22 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Ok, here we are. The bad one uses C2 which stops the local apic on the VAIO. I suspect we end up in the suspend/resume with going into C2 without the broadcast active. Can you try to get the output of SysRq-Q during the it needs help from keyboard period ? That's a bit

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-22 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 18:37 +, Pavel Machek wrote: That's a bit tricky because hitting the keyboard is what unsticks things. And the video is black after resume-from-RAM (has always been thus) and we Ok, can we try to fix the video issue for you? That should make the development

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-22 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 22 September 2007 10:50, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 18:37 +, Pavel Machek wrote: That's a bit tricky because hitting the keyboard is what unsticks things. And the video is black after resume-from-RAM (has always been thus) and we Ok, can we try to

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:57:42 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does the test hack below fix the problem for nohz/highres enabled > kernels ? > > tglx > > --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c > @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ static int

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-12 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 02:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:49:47 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 21:52 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] > > > > latency[001]

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:49:47 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 21:52 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[001] > > > usage[0010] duration[] > > >*C2:

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:52:01 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > there doesn't seem to be a lot of difference in the time handling, > > > > except > > > > there are large changes in when things happen in the bootup

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-12 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 02:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:49:47 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 21:52 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[001] usage[0010]

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:57:42 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does the test hack below fix the problem for nohz/highres enabled kernels ? tglx --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ static int

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:52:01 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: there doesn't seem to be a lot of difference in the time handling, except there are large changes in when things happen in the bootup sequence.

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:49:47 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 21:52 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[001] usage[0010] duration[] *C2:

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 21:52 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[001] > > usage[0010] duration[] > >*C2: type[C2] promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[001] > > usage[8316]

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > there doesn't seem to be a lot of difference in the time handling, except > > > there are large changes in when things happen in the bootup sequence. > > > > The question is whether the system goes into C2 with the patch applied. > >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:35:15 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > dmesg without the cpuidle patch: > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-bad.txt > > dmesg with the cpuidle patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-good.txt > > difference:

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 20:25, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:09:12 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:22, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:55 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]>

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:38:03 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > It evidently assumes cpuidle to be present, which is not in the mainline. > > > > Bear in mind that the cpuidle patch fixes resume-from-ram when cpuidle

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:25:31 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > dmesg without the cpuidle patch: > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-bad.txt dmesg with the cpuidle > patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-good.txt difference: >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > It evidently assumes cpuidle to be present, which is not in the mainline. > > Bear in mind that the cpuidle patch fixes resume-from-ram when cpuidle is > disabled in config. > > > It seems to me that the total effect of this one and the

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:09:12 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:22, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:55 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:31, Andrew Morton

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:22, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:55 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:31, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:55 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:31, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:31, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:20:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:20:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:20:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:20 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches > > > >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:20:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches > > > 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6. So all I can think is that > > >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches > > 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6. So all I can think is that there > > must have been something else in the tree which I tested which fixed the > > bug

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:34:31 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches > > > 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6. So all I can think is that > > >

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches > > 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6. So all I can think is that there > > must have been something else in the tree which I tested which fixed the > > bug

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 00:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > This patch broke the jinxed vaio. > > > > > > Which is a bit odd, considering that I must have tested it at the time. > > > But I bisected it right down to this commit, and the below revert patch > > > fixed it up. > > > > I just

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:37:16 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 14:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > clockevents: fix resume logic > > > > > > We need to make sure, that the clockevent devices are resumed, before > > > the tick is

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 14:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > clockevents: fix resume logic > > > > We need to make sure, that the clockevent devices are resumed, before > > the tick is resumed. The current resume logic does not guarantee this. > > > > Add

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 14:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: clockevents: fix resume logic We need to make sure, that the clockevent devices are resumed, before the tick is resumed. The current resume logic does not guarantee this. Add CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME and

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:37:16 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 14:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: clockevents: fix resume logic We need to make sure, that the clockevent devices are resumed, before the tick is resumed. The

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 00:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: This patch broke the jinxed vaio. Which is a bit odd, considering that I must have tested it at the time. But I bisected it right down to this commit, and the below revert patch fixed it up. I just looked up, that you

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6. So all I can think is that there must have been something else in the tree which I tested which fixed the bug which

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:34:31 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6. So all I can think is that there

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6. So all I can think is that there must have been something else in the tree which I tested which fixed the bug which

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6. So all I can think is that there

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:20:05 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:20 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:20:05 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: I went back to

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:20:05 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:31, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:20:05 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:55 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:31, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:22, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:55 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:31, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:09:12 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:22, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:55 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:31, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue,

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: It evidently assumes cpuidle to be present, which is not in the mainline. Bear in mind that the cpuidle patch fixes resume-from-ram when cpuidle is disabled in config. It seems to me that the total effect of this one and the

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:25:31 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dmesg without the cpuidle patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-bad.txt dmesg with the cpuidle patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-good.txt difference: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-diff.txt

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:38:03 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: It evidently assumes cpuidle to be present, which is not in the mainline. Bear in mind that the cpuidle patch fixes resume-from-ram when cpuidle is

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 20:25, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:09:12 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:22, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:55 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:35:15 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dmesg without the cpuidle patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-bad.txt dmesg with the cpuidle patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-good.txt difference:

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: there doesn't seem to be a lot of difference in the time handling, except there are large changes in when things happen in the bootup sequence. The question is whether the system goes into C2 with the patch applied. Can you

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 21:52 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[001] usage[0010] duration[] *C2: type[C2] promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[001] usage[8316]

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:59:11 GMT Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > Gitweb: > http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6 > Commit: 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6 > Parent:

Re: clockevents: fix resume logic

2007-09-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:59:11 GMT Linux Kernel Mailing List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org wrote: Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6 Commit: 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6 Parent: