On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 3:47 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:50:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:44:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:50:31 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
Hi all,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:50:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:44:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:50:31 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
>
Hi all,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:44:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:50:31 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> > these warnings:
> >
> > include/linux/dma-buf-map.h:106: warning: Excess
Hi all,
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:50:31 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
> these warnings:
>
> include/linux/dma-buf-map.h:106: warning: Excess function parameter 'vaddr'
> description in
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 14:16:40 +1100
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced these warnings:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c: In function 'vc4_bo_stats_debugfs':
>
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 14:16:40 +1100
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced these warnings:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_bo.c: In function 'vc4_bo_stats_debugfs':
>
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 17:45:10 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> > On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:05:14 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
> >>
> >> Not sure what's going on. I see your "yesterday" list present, and not
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 17:45:10 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> > On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:05:14 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
> >>
> >> Not sure what's going on. I see your "yesterday" list present, and not
> >> your "today" commit.
> >
> > I just refetched the
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:05:14 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>>
>> Not sure what's going on. I see your "yesterday" list present, and not
>> your "today" commit.
>
> I just refetched the drm-misc tree and received no
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:05:14 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>>
>> Not sure what's going on. I see your "yesterday" list present, and not
>> your "today" commit.
>
> I just refetched the drm-misc tree and received no changes. It is
> still as I said in the
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:05:14 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Not sure what's going on. I see your "yesterday" list present, and not
> your "today" commit.
I just refetched the drm-misc tree and received no changes. It is
still as I said in the previous email. This tree
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 14:05:14 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Not sure what's going on. I see your "yesterday" list present, and not
> your "today" commit.
I just refetched the drm-misc tree and received no changes. It is
still as I said in the previous email. This tree is fetched from
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2017 11:49:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 19 May 2017 10:49:06 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>> >
>> > Stephen Rothwell writes:
>> >
>>
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2017 11:49:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 19 May 2017 10:49:06 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>> >
>> > Stephen Rothwell writes:
>> >
>> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> > > allmodconfig)
Hi all,
On Thu, 25 May 2017 11:49:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 May 2017 10:49:06 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> > Stephen Rothwell writes:
> >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build
Hi all,
On Thu, 25 May 2017 11:49:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 May 2017 10:49:06 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> > Stephen Rothwell writes:
> >
> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > produced these warnings:
> > >
> > >
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 19 May 2017 10:49:06 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > produced these warnings:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:81:12:
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 19 May 2017 10:49:06 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > produced these warnings:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:81:12: warning: 'pl111_modeset_init'
> > defined
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Dave,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced these warnings:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:81:12: warning: 'pl111_modeset_init'
> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Dave,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> produced these warnings:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c:81:12: warning: 'pl111_modeset_init'
> defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> > ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
>> >
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:error: recursive dependency detected!
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_UDL
> > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:error: recursive dependency detected!
> > drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_UDL depends on USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD
> > drivers/usb/Kconfig:76:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:error: recursive dependency detected!
> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_UDL
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Dave,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:error: recursive dependency detected!
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:error: recursive dependency detected!
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_UDL depends on USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD
drivers/usb/Kconfig:76: symbol
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:error: recursive dependency detected!
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_UDL
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 01:58:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:error: recursive dependency detected!
> drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 01:58:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Dave,
After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:error: recursive dependency detected!
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/Kconfig:1:
28 matches
Mail list logo