Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 1:15 PM Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:31:31AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got conflicts in: > > > > arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c > > kernel/seccomp.c > > > > between commit: > > > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:31:31AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got conflicts in: > > arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c > kernel/seccomp.c > > between commit: > > b35f549df1d7 ("syscalls: Remove start and number from >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c > > between commit: > > 613dbd95723a ("netfilter: x_tables: move hook state into xt_action_param >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c > > between commit: > > 613dbd95723a ("netfilter: x_tables: move hook state into xt_action_param > structure") > > from Linus'

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 2017-03-24 13:18, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c > > between commit: > > 613dbd95723a ("netfilter: x_tables: move hook state into xt_action_param > structure") > > from Linus'

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 2017-03-24 13:18, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c > > between commit: > > 613dbd95723a ("netfilter: x_tables: move hook state into xt_action_param > structure") > > from Linus'

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 2017-01-19 13:51, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > include/uapi/linux/audit.h > > between commits: > > 7ff89ac608d9 ("audit: add exclude filter extension to feature bitmap") > dcdaa2f9480c ("Merge

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 2017-01-19 13:51, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > include/uapi/linux/audit.h > > between commits: > > 7ff89ac608d9 ("audit: add exclude filter extension to feature bitmap") > dcdaa2f9480c ("Merge

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 2016-11-22 16:29, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Paul, > > Hi Stephen, > >> Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: >> >> include/uapi/linux/audit.h >> >> between commit: >> >> 7ff89ac608d9

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 2016-11-22 16:29, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Paul, > > Hi Stephen, > >> Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: >> >> include/uapi/linux/audit.h >> >> between commit: >> >> 7ff89ac608d9 ("audit: add

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 2016-11-22 16:29, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > include/uapi/linux/audit.h > > between commit: > > 7ff89ac608d9 ("audit: add exclude filter extension to feature bitmap") > > from Linus' tree and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 2016-11-22 16:29, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > include/uapi/linux/audit.h > > between commit: > > 7ff89ac608d9 ("audit: add exclude filter extension to feature bitmap") > > from Linus' tree and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

Hi Richard, On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:30:12 -0500 Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > Stephen, your patch looks fine to me. I had some minor concerns about > deeper issues as to whether the original intent of that part of the > audit subsystem was affected by this change, but that is WRT the >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 15/11/19, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > > > kernel/audit.c > > > > between commit: > > > > d0164adc89f6 ("mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > kernel/audit.c > > between commit: > > d0164adc89f6 ("mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, > unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 15/11/19, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > > > kernel/audit.c > > > > between commit: > > > > d0164adc89f6 ("mm, page_alloc:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

Hi Richard, On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:30:12 -0500 Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > Stephen, your patch looks fine to me. I had some minor concerns about > deeper issues as to whether the original intent of that part of the > audit subsystem was affected by this change, but that is

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > kernel/audit.c > > between commit: > > d0164adc89f6 ("mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, > unwilling to

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 01:55:01 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > include/linux/lsm_audit.h > > between commit: > > 671a2781ff01 ("security: add ioctl specific auditing to lsm_audit") > > from Linus' tree and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 01:55:01 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > include/linux/lsm_audit.h > > between commit: > > 671a2781ff01 ("security: add ioctl specific auditing to lsm_audit") > > from Linus' tree and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 15/08/07, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: > > kernel/audit.c > > between commit: > > 5985de6754a6 ("audit: code clean up") > > from Linus' tree and commit: > > 84cb777e6781 ("audit: use macros for unset

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 15/08/07, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Paul, Hi Stephen, Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in: kernel/audit.c between commit: 5985de6754a6 (audit: code clean up) from Linus' tree and commit: 84cb777e6781 (audit: use macros for unset inode and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 15/06/01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in > security/lsm_audit.c between commit 5deeb5cece3f ("lsm: copy comm > before calling audit_log to avoid race in string printing") from Linus' > tree and commit 5c5bc97e2fc8 ("lsm:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 15/06/01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Paul, Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in security/lsm_audit.c between commit 5deeb5cece3f (lsm: copy comm before calling audit_log to avoid race in string printing) from Linus' tree and commit 5c5bc97e2fc8 (lsm: rename

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in > include/linux/audit.h between commit 041d7b98ffe5 ("audit: restore > AUDIT_LOGINUID unset ABI") from Linus' tree and commit e80da768eae4 > ("audit: remove

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Hi Paul, Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in include/linux/audit.h between commit 041d7b98ffe5 (audit: restore AUDIT_LOGINUID unset ABI) from Linus' tree and commit e80da768eae4 (audit:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 14:02 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > You could have avoided this by doing a fast forward merge of v3.15-rc1 > instead of the v3.14 merge (since everything in your tree before that > merge was also in Linus' tree by v3.15-rc1). This is a situation I've never really known

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 14:02 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: You could have avoided this by doing a fast forward merge of v3.15-rc1 instead of the v3.14 merge (since everything in your tree before that merge was also in Linus' tree by v3.15-rc1). This is a situation I've never really known the

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

Hi Richard, On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:54:13 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > [Eric: that audit tree commit has no Signed-off-by from you even though > > you committed it ... there are a few like that] > > I added my Signed-off to the list posting. The point is that Eric (Paris) committed your

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 14/04/01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Eric, Hi Stephen, > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in > kernel/audit.c between commit aa4af831bb4f ("AUDIT: Allow login in > non-init namespaces") from Linus' tree and commit 5a3cb3b6c3a0 ("audit: > allow user processes to log

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

On 14/04/01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Eric, Hi Stephen, Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in kernel/audit.c between commit aa4af831bb4f (AUDIT: Allow login in non-init namespaces) from Linus' tree and commit 5a3cb3b6c3a0 (audit: allow user processes to log from

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree

Hi Richard, On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:54:13 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs r...@redhat.com wrote: [Eric: that audit tree commit has no Signed-off-by from you even though you committed it ... there are a few like that] I added my Signed-off to the list posting. The point is that Eric (Paris)