> I am fairly confident something in ac2 is fishy. I can repeatable get
> ac2 to fail with PCMCIA and also reiserfs under load, I absolutely
> cannot get these failures without ac2.
The PCMCIA thing is unlikely to be related (there are no changes on any PCMCIA
that actually worked on 13pre4).
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
> > > > > address (004) ?
> > > >
>
> Hi - Here's another Oops from the same machine. It looks to be in a totally
> different place in the code which
> > > >
> > > > Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
> > > > address (004) ?
> > >
Hi - Here's another Oops from the same machine. It looks to be in a totally
different place in the code which probably means it's a memory problem? I'll
try installing on
> > > Alan,
> > >
> > > Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
> > > address (004) ?
> >
> > They vary in report
>
> Doesn't it sounds like memory problems?
For -ac Im working on the assumption I introduced a bug into the mm code
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Alan,
> >
> > Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
> > address (004) ?
>
> They vary in report
Doesn't it sounds like memory problems?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> Alan,
>
> Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
> address (004) ?
They vary in report
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Hi - we are seeing the following repeatable Oops in 2.4t13p4ac2 compiled using
> > gcc 2.95.2 for PIII running on IDE disks. Occurs whilst copying lots of files
> > to/from remote filesystems.
>
> I've had a couple of reports
> Hi - we are seeing the following repeatable Oops in 2.4t13p4ac2 compiled using
> gcc 2.95.2 for PIII running on IDE disks. Occurs whilst copying lots of files
> to/from remote filesystems.
I've had a couple of reports like this. Can you test 2.4t13p4 without the -ac
changes. I
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi - we are seeing the following repeatable Oops in 2.4t13p4ac2 compiled using
> gcc 2.95.2 for PIII running on IDE disks. Occurs whilst copying lots of files
> to/from remote filesystems.
>
> Thank you
>
> Chris
>
&
Hi - we are seeing the following repeatable Oops in 2.4t13p4ac2 compiled using
gcc 2.95.2 for PIII running on IDE disks. Occurs whilst copying lots of files
to/from remote filesystems.
Thank you
Chris
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0004
c0131891
*pde =
Hi - we are seeing the following repeatable Oops in 2.4t13p4ac2 compiled using
gcc 2.95.2 for PIII running on IDE disks. Occurs whilst copying lots of files
to/from remote filesystems.
Thank you
Chris
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0004
c0131891
*pde =
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi - we are seeing the following repeatable Oops in 2.4t13p4ac2 compiled using
gcc 2.95.2 for PIII running on IDE disks. Occurs whilst copying lots of files
to/from remote filesystems.
Thank you
Chris
Unable to handle kernel paging
Hi - we are seeing the following repeatable Oops in 2.4t13p4ac2 compiled using
gcc 2.95.2 for PIII running on IDE disks. Occurs whilst copying lots of files
to/from remote filesystems.
I've had a couple of reports like this. Can you test 2.4t13p4 without the -ac
changes. If the -ac changes
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
Hi - we are seeing the following repeatable Oops in 2.4t13p4ac2 compiled using
gcc 2.95.2 for PIII running on IDE disks. Occurs whilst copying lots of files
to/from remote filesystems.
I've had a couple of reports like this. Can you test 2.4t13p4
Alan,
Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
address (004) ?
They vary in report
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
Alan,
Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
address (004) ?
They vary in report
Doesn't it sounds like memory problems?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
Alan,
Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
address (004) ?
They vary in report
Doesn't it sounds like memory problems?
For -ac Im working on the assumption I introduced a bug into the mm code
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
address (004) ?
Hi - Here's another Oops from the same machine. It looks to be in a totally
different place in the code which probably means it's a memory problem? I'll
try installing on another box to
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you remember if the reports you've got always oopsed the same
address (004) ?
Hi - Here's another Oops from the same machine. It looks to be in a totally
different place in the code which probably means it's a
I am fairly confident something in ac2 is fishy. I can repeatable get
ac2 to fail with PCMCIA and also reiserfs under load, I absolutely
cannot get these failures without ac2.
The PCMCIA thing is unlikely to be related (there are no changes on any PCMCIA
that actually worked on 13pre4).
20 matches
Mail list logo
