* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, "make -s -j" workload hanged the machine, leading to lot of
> OOM killings. This was on a 8-cpu machine with no swap space
> configured and 4GB RAM. The same workload works "fine" (runs to
> completion) on 2.6.22.
while i agree
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:26:48PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
> alert (This is when kernbench reached make -j).
>
> Also make -j is hanging.
[refer http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=118474574807055 for
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:26:48PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
alert (This is when kernbench reached make -j).
Also make -j is hanging.
[refer http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=118474574807055 for complete
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, make -s -j workload hanged the machine, leading to lot of
OOM killings. This was on a 8-cpu machine with no swap space
configured and 4GB RAM. The same workload works fine (runs to
completion) on 2.6.22.
while i agree that the
> (gdb) thread 6
> [Switching to thread 6 (process 6233)]#0 __do_softirq ()
> at kernel/softirq.c:231
> 231 if (pending & 1) {
> (gdb) bt
> #0 __do_softirq () at kernel/softirq.c:231
> #1 0xc012998b in do_softirq () at kernel/softirq.c:269
> #2 0xc0129a09 in irq_exit ()
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 08:16:37PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:11:42PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
(gdb) thread 6
[Switching to thread 6 (process 6233)]#0 __do_softirq ()
at kernel/softirq.c:231
231 if (pending 1) {
(gdb) bt
#0 __do_softirq () at kernel/softirq.c:231
#1 0xc012998b in do_softirq () at kernel/softirq.c:269
#2 0xc0129a09 in irq_exit () at
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 08:16:37PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:11:42PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the
Hi Chuck,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:08:18AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 07/18/2007 05:41 AM, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> Softlockup is broken in
On 07/18/2007 05:41 AM, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
>>> alert (This is when kernbench
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:11:42PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> In the meantime I will go and check if it was there in 2.6.22-rc4-mm2
>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
> > alert (This is when kernbench reached make -j).
>
> hm, never had a report
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
> alert (This is when kernbench reached make -j).
hm, never had a report of that before. It's the first time I've seen
hangcheck produce anything
Hi Andrew,
I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
alert (This is when kernbench reached make -j).
Also make -j is hanging.
(Also checked, it doesn't hang on 2.6.22)
This is my /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
Hi Andrew,
I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
alert (This is when kernbench reached make -j).
Also make -j is hanging.
(Also checked, it doesn't hang on 2.6.22)
This is my /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
alert (This is when kernbench reached make -j).
hm, never had a report of that before. It's the first time I've seen
hangcheck produce anything
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
alert (This is when kernbench reached make -j).
hm, never had a report of that
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:11:42PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime I will go and check if it was there in 2.6.22-rc4-mm2
It is
On 07/18/2007 05:41 AM, Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was running kernbench on top of 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 and I got a Hangcheck
alert (This is when kernbench reached make
Hi Chuck,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:08:18AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 07/18/2007 05:41 AM, Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:07:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:26:48 +0530 Dhaval Giani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Softlockup is broken in 2.6.22.
20 matches
Mail list logo
