Re: Unified power management userspace policy

John Fremlin wrote: > > Hi! > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Could you please use call_usermodehelper() in this patch > > rather than exec_usermodehelper()? I want to kill > > exec_usermodehelper() sometime. > > The reason I used exec_usermodehelper is that I wanted to

Re: Unified power management userspace policy

Hi! Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could you please use call_usermodehelper() in this patch > rather than exec_usermodehelper()? I want to kill > exec_usermodehelper() sometime. The reason I used exec_usermodehelper is that I wanted to waitpid on the process to see how it

Re: Unified power management userspace policy

John Fremlin wrote: > > Hi all! > > At the moment there are two power management drivers in the linux > kernel (AFAIK). They each have different userspace interfaces -- > /proc/apm and /dev/apmctl and /proc/sys/acpi/events or something. This > is not altogether bad, but as they do the same

Re: Unified power management userspace policy

John Fremlin wrote: Hi all! At the moment there are two power management drivers in the linux kernel (AFAIK). They each have different userspace interfaces -- /proc/apm and /dev/apmctl and /proc/sys/acpi/events or something. This is not altogether bad, but as they do the same thing, it

Unified power management userspace policy

Hi all! At the moment there are two power management drivers in the linux kernel (AFAIK). They each have different userspace interfaces -- /proc/apm and /dev/apmctl and /proc/sys/acpi/events or something. This is not altogether bad, but as they do the same thing, it might be nice to unify

Unified power management userspace policy

Hi all! At the moment there are two power management drivers in the linux kernel (AFAIK). They each have different userspace interfaces -- /proc/apm and /dev/apmctl and /proc/sys/acpi/events or something. This is not altogether bad, but as they do the same thing, it might be nice to unify