Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-12-01 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The corresponding PCI code in pci_device_suspend() does not do > any generic device disable or resource release. I don't know > why PNP disables the device on suspend. I glanced through the > ACPI spec but didn't

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-12-01 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 12/01/2007 09:12 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 11/30/2007 11:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Friday 30 November 2007 03:49:55 pm Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> On 11/30/2007 10:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-12-01 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 11/30/2007 11:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Friday 30 November 2007 03:49:55 pm Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 11/30/2007 10:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 > Maybe we could either remove the

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-12-01 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 11/30/2007 11:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Friday 30 November 2007 03:49:55 pm Jiri Slaby wrote: On 11/30/2007 10:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 Maybe we could either remove the

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-12-01 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 12/01/2007 09:12 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: On 11/30/2007 11:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Friday 30 November 2007 03:49:55 pm Jiri Slaby wrote: On 11/30/2007 10:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 Maybe

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-12-01 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The corresponding PCI code in pci_device_suspend() does not do any generic device disable or resource release. I don't know why PNP disables the device on suspend. I glanced through the ACPI spec but didn't see a

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-30 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Friday 30 November 2007 03:49:55 pm Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 11/30/2007 10:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 > >>> Maybe we could either remove the pnp_{stop,start}_dev() calls > >>> from the

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 11/30/2007 10:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 >>> Maybe we could either remove the pnp_{stop,start}_dev() calls >>> from the suspend/resume path, or move the PNP resource management >>> out of

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-30 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 > Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Monday 26 November 2007 11:05:38 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-30 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 26 November 2007 11:05:38 pm Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I hit the bug,

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-30 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Friday 30 November 2007 03:49:55 pm Jiri Slaby wrote: On 11/30/2007 10:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 Maybe we could either remove the pnp_{stop,start}_dev() calls from the suspend/resume

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 11/30/2007 10:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:42:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 Maybe we could either remove the pnp_{stop,start}_dev() calls from the suspend/resume path, or move the PNP resource management out of

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 26 November 2007 11:05:38 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, I hit the bug, suspend of 00:06 device complains about it: > > >

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-29 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Monday 26 November 2007 11:05:38 pm Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, I hit the bug, suspend of 00:06 device complains about it: > > WARNING: at .../kernel/resource.c:185 __release_resource() > > > > Call Trace: > > []

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-29 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Monday 26 November 2007 11:05:38 pm Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I hit the bug, suspend of 00:06 device complains about it: WARNING: at .../kernel/resource.c:185 __release_resource() Call Trace: [8023f7b5]

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:40:37 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 26 November 2007 11:05:38 pm Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I hit the bug, suspend of 00:06 device complains about it: WARNING: at

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-27 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:05:38PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Step aside. What's the purpose of having two similar patches for one issue, > > it then warns about the same thing twice: > >

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-27 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:05:38PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Step aside. What's the purpose of having two similar patches for one issue, it then warns about the same thing twice:

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Step aside. What's the purpose of having two similar patches for one issue, > it then warns about the same thing twice: > make-sure-nobodys-leaking-resources.patch > releasing-resources-with-children.patch Oh

Re: WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:41:16 +0100 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Step aside. What's the purpose of having two similar patches for one issue, it then warns about the same thing twice: make-sure-nobodys-leaking-resources.patch releasing-resources-with-children.patch Oh well. It's

WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-22 Thread Jiri Slaby
Hi, Step aside. What's the purpose of having two similar patches for one issue, it then warns about the same thing twice: make-sure-nobodys-leaking-resources.patch releasing-resources-with-children.patch Ok, I hit the bug, suspend of 00:06 device complains about it: WARNING: at

WARNING: at kernel/resource.c:189 __release_resource

2007-11-22 Thread Jiri Slaby
Hi, Step aside. What's the purpose of having two similar patches for one issue, it then warns about the same thing twice: make-sure-nobodys-leaking-resources.patch releasing-resources-with-children.patch Ok, I hit the bug, suspend of 00:06 device complains about it: WARNING: at