On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:59:53AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >> Does "xfstests fuzzing infrastructure" use coverage-guidance?
> >
> > It's guided
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:59:53AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >> Does "xfstests fuzzing infrastructure" use coverage-guidance?
> >
> > It's guided manually to fuzz a
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Does "xfstests fuzzing infrastructure" use coverage-guidance?
>
> It's guided manually to fuzz a substantial proportion of the fields
> in the on-disk
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Does "xfstests fuzzing infrastructure" use coverage-guidance?
>
> It's guided manually to fuzz a substantial proportion of the fields
> in the on-disk format that are
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Does "xfstests fuzzing infrastructure" use coverage-guidance?
It's guided manually to fuzz a substantial proportion of the fields
in the on-disk format that are susceptible to fuzzing bqased
attacks. It's not complete coverage yet,
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Does "xfstests fuzzing infrastructure" use coverage-guidance?
It's guided manually to fuzz a substantial proportion of the fields
in the on-disk format that are susceptible to fuzzing bqased
attacks. It's not complete coverage yet,
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?id=5719304272084992
syzkaller reproducer:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?id=5767783983874048
>>>
>>> What a mess. A hand built, hopelessly broken
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?id=5719304272084992
syzkaller reproducer:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?id=5767783983874048
>>>
>>> What a mess. A hand built, hopelessly broken filesystem
>>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?id=5719304272084992
>>> syzkaller reproducer:
>>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?id=5767783983874048
>>
>> What a mess. A hand built, hopelessly broken filesystem image made
>> up of hex dumps, written into a mmap()d region of
>>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?id=5719304272084992
>>> syzkaller reproducer:
>>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?id=5767783983874048
>>
>> What a mess. A hand built, hopelessly broken filesystem image made
>> up of hex dumps, written into a mmap()d region of
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>
> On 5/8/18 2:52 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>> Or put another way, how did you arrive at the fs image values in the
>>> reproducer,
>>> i.e.:
>> Currently they are completely random, nobody taught syzkaller about AGFs,
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>
> On 5/8/18 2:52 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>> Or put another way, how did you arrive at the fs image values in the
>>> reproducer,
>>> i.e.:
>> Currently they are completely random, nobody taught syzkaller about AGFs,
>> etc.
>
> So you
On 5/8/18 9:37 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:50:11AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
Hello,
syzbot hit the
On 5/8/18 9:37 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:50:11AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
Hello,
syzbot hit the following crash on
On 5/8/18 2:52 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Or put another way, how did you arrive at the fs image values in the
>> reproducer,
>> i.e.:
> Currently they are completely random, nobody taught syzkaller about AGFs, etc.
So you just combine a few megabytes of purely random bits out of thin air
On 5/8/18 2:52 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Or put another way, how did you arrive at the fs image values in the
>> reproducer,
>> i.e.:
> Currently they are completely random, nobody taught syzkaller about AGFs, etc.
So you just combine a few megabytes of purely random bits out of thin air
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:50:11AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > >> >>> Hello,
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
>
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:50:11AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > >> >>> Hello,
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> > >> >>>
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> >> >>> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> >> >>> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018
> >> >>> +)
>
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>>
>> >>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
>> >>> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018 +)
>> >>> Merge branch 'ras-core-for-linus' of
>> >>>
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>>
>> >>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
>> >>> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018 +)
>> >>> Merge branch 'ras-core-for-linus' of
>> >>>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/30/18 9:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> ...
>
It just extracted kernel source file name that looked relevant
to this crash and
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/30/18 9:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> ...
>
It just extracted kernel source file name that looked relevant
to this crash and run get_maintainers.pl on it.
Also the
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/30/18 9:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> ...
>
It just extracted kernel source file name that looked relevant
to this crash and
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/30/18 9:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> ...
>
It just extracted kernel source file name that looked relevant
to this crash and run get_maintainers.pl on it.
Also the
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/30/18 9:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Suggestions are welcome. Currently it says "syzbot hit the following
>> crash on upstream commit SHA1", which was supposed to mean just the
>> state of the source tree when the
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/30/18 9:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Suggestions are welcome. Currently it says "syzbot hit the following
>> crash on upstream commit SHA1", which was supposed to mean just the
>> state of the source tree when the crash happened. But I
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> syzbot hit the following crash on
On 4/30/18 9:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
>>> It just extracted kernel source file name that looked relevant
>>> to this crash and run get_maintainers.pl on it.
>>> Also the image can contain dynamically generated
On 4/30/18 9:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
>>> It just extracted kernel source file name that looked relevant
>>> to this crash and run get_maintainers.pl on it.
>>> Also the image can contain dynamically generated data, which makes it
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/30/18 8:23 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:22 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> It sure /seems/ to have a notion of images: what else is syz_mount_image()?
>>>
>>> i.e.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/30/18 8:23 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:22 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> It sure /seems/ to have a notion of images: what else is syz_mount_image()?
>>>
>>> i.e. you are mounting an image to reproduce
On 4/30/18 8:23 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:22 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
>> It sure /seems/ to have a notion of images: what else is syz_mount_image()?
>>
>> i.e. you are mounting an image to reproduce the problem, correct?
>> And the system is
On 4/30/18 8:23 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:22 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
...
>> It sure /seems/ to have a notion of images: what else is syz_mount_image()?
>>
>> i.e. you are mounting an image to reproduce the problem, correct?
>> And the system is "smart" enough to fire
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
>>>
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
>>> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2
ms
list. It just extracted kernel source file name that looked relevant
to this crash and run get_maintainers.pl on it.
Also the image can contain dynamically generated data, which makes it
impossible to have as a file at all.
Thinking of this, what should be reasonably easy to do and may be a
compro
run get_maintainers.pl on it.
Also the image can contain dynamically generated data, which makes it
impossible to have as a file at all.
Thinking of this, what should be reasonably easy to do and may be a
compromise for near future is the following. We could insert code into
syz_mount_image() which d
n email to a filesystem list;
if it does so, add a link to the image itself, as you already have already done
for the C reproducer.
Filesystem images are common parlance for filesystem engineers. When
you engage with them you'll have better results if you provide them with
inputs t
to the image itself, as you already have already done
for the C reproducer.
Filesystem images are common parlance for filesystem engineers. When
you engage with them you'll have better results if you provide them with
inputs they can use directly instead of requiring them to reverse-engineer
your cus
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:38:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:54:50PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> > >
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:38:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:54:50PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:38:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:54:50PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:38:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:54:50PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> syzbot hit the following
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:54:50PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> >>
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:54:50PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> >> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
>> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018 +)
>> Merge branch
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
>> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018 +)
>> Merge branch 'ras-core-for-linus' of
>>
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018 +)
> Merge branch 'ras-core-for-linus' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
> syzbot
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> 86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018 +)
> Merge branch 'ras-core-for-linus' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
> syzbot
Hello,
syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018 +)
Merge branch 'ras-core-for-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
syzbot dashboard link:
Hello,
syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
86bbbebac1933e6e95e8234c4f7d220c5ddd38bc (Mon Apr 2 18:47:07 2018 +)
Merge branch 'ras-core-for-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
syzbot dashboard link:
54 matches
Mail list logo