On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the current checkpatch.pl does not reject new files that lack a
> newline, yet rejects patches that fix newlines in files ... quite the
> opposite of what we actually want
[EMAIL PROTECTED] echo -n "moo" >no-newline.c
[EMAIL
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the current checkpatch.pl does not reject new files that lack a
> newline, yet rejects patches that fix newlines in files ... quite the
> opposite of what we actually want
Nice. Just what the world needs. I wonder what the heck
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the current checkpatch.pl does not reject new files that lack a
newline, yet rejects patches that fix newlines in files ... quite the
opposite of what we actually want
Nice. Just what the world needs. I wonder what the heck that
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the current checkpatch.pl does not reject new files that lack a
newline, yet rejects patches that fix newlines in files ... quite the
opposite of what we actually want
[EMAIL PROTECTED] echo -n moo no-newline.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the current checkpatch.pl does not reject new files that lack a
newline, yet rejects patches that fix newlines in files ... quite the
opposite of what we actually want
$ echo -n moo > no-newline
$ diff -Nu /dev/null no-newline
--- /dev/null 2007-11-10 20:02:36.24800 -0500
+++ no-newline
the current checkpatch.pl does not reject new files that lack a
newline, yet rejects patches that fix newlines in files ... quite the
opposite of what we actually want
$ echo -n moo no-newline
$ diff -Nu /dev/null no-newline
--- /dev/null 2007-11-10 20:02:36.24800 -0500
+++ no-newline
6 matches
Mail list logo
