On 4/6/07, Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
[...]
>>> 1 if (To control chain reactions, your odds
>>> 2 Improve if you've got cadmium rods) {
>>> 3 In your fission reactor
>>> 4 Their lack is a factor
>>> 5 }
>>> 6 In
On Friday 06 April 2007 18:57, David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 06 April 2007 3:17 pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > http://tglx.de/private/tglx/usbnet.png
> >
> > /me recommends emacs-develock.el for colorful white space wreckage
> > display !
>
> Then I'd have to switch to EMACS
On Friday 06 April 2007 18:57, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2007 3:17 pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
David,
http://tglx.de/private/tglx/usbnet.png
/me recommends emacs-develock.el for colorful white space wreckage
display !
Then I'd have to switch to EMACS ... no thanks!
On 4/6/07, Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
[...]
1 if (To control chain reactions, your odds
2 Improve if you've got cadmium rods) {
3 In your fission reactor
4 Their lack is a factor
5 }
6 In screams of A meltdown!
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tabs should be used for indent, not padding. People wanting to use
> different-sized tabs can change settings in their editor, i.e.
> to make a tab 12 instead of 8. Or 6. Or whatever. If tabs only ever
> appear at the front, this works, it breaks when
On Apr 6 2007 15:40, David Brownell wrote:
>> >if (...) {
>> >THAT WAS ONE MORE TAB
>> >}
>> >
>> >Come on, stop wasting everyone's time with utter nonsense.
>> I was never debating these two things.
>Actually, you did.
If it was perceived I did, then I owe you an apology.
On Friday 06 April 2007 4:21 pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> David,
>
> On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 15:57 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > This particular issue doesn't actually affect indentation, since the
> > tab trumps that space. So it's a bit off-agenda for this particular
> > flamage.
>
> ROTFL,
David,
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 15:57 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> This particular issue doesn't actually affect indentation, since the
> tab trumps that space. So it's a bit off-agenda for this particular
> flamage.
ROTFL, the tab trumps the space. Is this a card game ?
> > Please change your
On Friday 06 April 2007 3:17 pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> David,
>
> http://tglx.de/private/tglx/usbnet.png
>
> /me recommends emacs-develock.el for colorful white space wreckage
> display !
Then I'd have to switch to EMACS ... no thanks! ;)
At the risk of switching to a VI/EMACS flamewar
On Friday 06 April 2007 3:04 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > if (...) {
> > THAT WAS ONE MORE TAB
> > }
> >
> >and
> >
> > for (...) {
> > THAT WAS ALSO ONE MORE TAB
> > }
> >
> >Come on, stop wasting everyone's time with utter nonsense.
>
> I was never
David,
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 14:05 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Please change your coding style to conform to Documentation/CodingStyle.
>
> *** Only indent with tabs!! ***
>
> Every one of those examples violates that simple rule.
>
> Why does *anyone* have even the
Hello David,
On Apr 6 2007 13:57, David Brownell wrote:
>> though I do not speak for
>> them, seem to do it much the way I described, judging from the code they
>> wrote/write.
>
>Your eyes are broken then ...
Sorry? I could have simply told you to look into kernel/signal.c LINE
220 (that's in
On Friday 06 April 2007 2:37 pm, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > Please change your coding style to conform to Documentation/CodingStyle.
> >
> > *** Only indent with tabs!! ***
> >
> > Every one of those examples violates that simple rule.
> >
>
> Spaces
On Apr 6 2007 14:05, David Brownell wrote:
>
>Please change your coding style to conform to Documentation/CodingStyle.
>
> *** Only indent with tabs!! ***
>
>Every one of those examples violates that simple rule.
>
>Why does *anyone* have even the slightest difficulty
David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 06 April 2007 12:03 pm, Stefan Richter wrote:
>
>> I usually indent this way if expressions exceed the 80 columns limit:
Or in other words:
- When a new scope is opened, increase indentations by 8 characters.
Use a tab for that.
- When wrapping within an
David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:03 pm, Stefan Richter wrote:
I usually indent this way if expressions exceed the 80 columns limit:
if (foo___ &&
bar___) {
doit;
}
and
if ((one___ ||
David Brownell wrote:
> Please change your coding style to conform to Documentation/CodingStyle.
>
> *** Only indent with tabs!! ***
>
> Every one of those examples violates that simple rule.
>
Spaces are used to indent all over the kernel; using a few spaces to pad
out some
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:16 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> and that the inner block code
> >> (lines 3 and 4) should have more indent than line 2.
> >
> >We disagree. The "inner" block should in all cases have one-tab indent.
>
> You disagree. "We", as in, the kernel coders,
... agree with
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:03 pm, Stefan Richter wrote:
>
> I usually indent this way if expressions exceed the 80 columns limit:
>
> if (foo___ &&
> bar___) {
> doit;
> }
> and
> if ((one___ ||
>one_and_a_half) &&
>
On Apr 6 2007 10:29, David Brownell wrote:
>> Using
>> /^\t+\x20{2,8}/ on continuation line(s) is perfect because it does
>> not cause either the continuation line(s) or the inner block code to
>> move too much to the right.
>
>No, that's a clear violation of CodingStyle on two separate points:
David Brownell wrote:
[...]
>>> 1 if (To control chain reactions, your odds
>>> 2 Improve if you've got cadmium rods) {
>>> 3 In your fission reactor
>>> 4 Their lack is a factor
>>> 5 }
>>> 6 In screams of "A meltdown! Ye gods!"
>>>
>>> Now, the former
On Thursday 05 April 2007 1:35 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> >obeys the only-ident-by-tabs rule, as does
> >
> >1if (To control chain reactions, your odds
> >2Improve if you've got cadmium rods) {
> >3In your fission reactor
> >4Their lack is a
On Thursday 05 April 2007 1:35 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
obeys the only-ident-by-tabs rule, as does
1if (To control chain reactions, your odds
2Improve if you've got cadmium rods) {
3In your fission reactor
4Their lack is a factor
5}
6
David Brownell wrote:
[...]
1 if (To control chain reactions, your odds
2 Improve if you've got cadmium rods) {
3 In your fission reactor
4 Their lack is a factor
5 }
6 In screams of A meltdown! Ye gods!
Now, the former makes it hard to tell
On Apr 6 2007 10:29, David Brownell wrote:
Using
/^\t+\x20{2,8}/ on continuation line(s) is perfect because it does
not cause either the continuation line(s) or the inner block code to
move too much to the right.
No, that's a clear violation of CodingStyle on two separate points:
(a) the
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:16 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
and that the inner block code
(lines 3 and 4) should have more indent than line 2.
We disagree. The inner block should in all cases have one-tab indent.
You disagree. We, as in, the kernel coders,
... agree with what I said,
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:03 pm, Stefan Richter wrote:
I usually indent this way if expressions exceed the 80 columns limit:
if (foo___
bar___) {
doit;
}
and
if ((one___ ||
one_and_a_half)
David Brownell wrote:
Please change your coding style to conform to Documentation/CodingStyle.
*** Only indent with tabs!! ***
Every one of those examples violates that simple rule.
Spaces are used to indent all over the kernel; using a few spaces to pad
out some
David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:03 pm, Stefan Richter wrote:
I usually indent this way if expressions exceed the 80 columns limit:
if (foo___
bar___) {
doit;
}
and
if ((one___ ||
David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:03 pm, Stefan Richter wrote:
I usually indent this way if expressions exceed the 80 columns limit:
Or in other words:
- When a new scope is opened, increase indentations by 8 characters.
Use a tab for that.
- When wrapping within an
On Friday 06 April 2007 2:37 pm, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
Please change your coding style to conform to Documentation/CodingStyle.
*** Only indent with tabs!! ***
Every one of those examples violates that simple rule.
Spaces are used to
On Apr 6 2007 14:05, David Brownell wrote:
Please change your coding style to conform to Documentation/CodingStyle.
*** Only indent with tabs!! ***
Every one of those examples violates that simple rule.
Why does *anyone* have even the slightest difficulty understanding such
Hello David,
On Apr 6 2007 13:57, David Brownell wrote:
though I do not speak for
them, seem to do it much the way I described, judging from the code they
wrote/write.
Your eyes are broken then ...
Sorry? I could have simply told you to look into kernel/signal.c LINE
220 (that's in the
David,
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 14:05 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Please change your coding style to conform to Documentation/CodingStyle.
*** Only indent with tabs!! ***
Every one of those examples violates that simple rule.
Why does *anyone* have even the slightest
On Friday 06 April 2007 3:04 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
if (...) {
THAT WAS ONE MORE TAB
}
and
for (...) {
THAT WAS ALSO ONE MORE TAB
}
Come on, stop wasting everyone's time with utter nonsense.
I was never debating these two things.
On Friday 06 April 2007 3:17 pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
David,
http://tglx.de/private/tglx/usbnet.png
/me recommends emacs-develock.el for colorful white space wreckage
display !
Then I'd have to switch to EMACS ... no thanks! ;)
At the risk of switching to a VI/EMACS flamewar (could
David,
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 15:57 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
This particular issue doesn't actually affect indentation, since the
tab trumps that space. So it's a bit off-agenda for this particular
flamage.
ROTFL, the tab trumps the space. Is this a card game ?
Please change your
On Friday 06 April 2007 4:21 pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
David,
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 15:57 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
This particular issue doesn't actually affect indentation, since the
tab trumps that space. So it's a bit off-agenda for this particular
flamage.
ROTFL, the tab
On Apr 6 2007 15:40, David Brownell wrote:
if (...) {
THAT WAS ONE MORE TAB
}
Come on, stop wasting everyone's time with utter nonsense.
I was never debating these two things.
Actually, you did.
If it was perceived I did, then I owe you an apology.
Go back and see
Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tabs should be used for indent, not padding. People wanting to use
different-sized tabs can change settings in their editor, i.e.
to make a tab 12 instead of 8. Or 6. Or whatever. If tabs only ever
appear at the front, this works, it breaks when tabs
40 matches
Mail list logo
