Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-26 Thread Con Kolivas
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 01:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Subsequent to that Con suggested testing a refactored RSDL patch. That > patch seemed to work on the machine at hand, so tests have been > submitted for all the affected machines. > >

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-26 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > >> This is about the only place I can see the run_list is looked at unlocked. >> Can >> you see if this simple patch helps? The debug patch is unnecessary now. > > Tests queued with this patch. Will let you know. That patch had no effect on the

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-26 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Con Kolivas wrote: > This is about the only place I can see the run_list is looked at unlocked. Can > you see if this simple patch helps? The debug patch is unnecessary now. Tests queued with this patch. Will let you know. -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-26 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Con Kolivas wrote: This is about the only place I can see the run_list is looked at unlocked. Can you see if this simple patch helps? The debug patch is unnecessary now. Tests queued with this patch. Will let you know. -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-26 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Andy Whitcroft wrote: Con Kolivas wrote: This is about the only place I can see the run_list is looked at unlocked. Can you see if this simple patch helps? The debug patch is unnecessary now. Tests queued with this patch. Will let you know. That patch had no effect on the problem. ...

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-26 Thread Con Kolivas
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 01:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote: Andy Whitcroft wrote: Subsequent to that Con suggested testing a refactored RSDL patch. That patch seemed to work on the machine at hand, so tests have been submitted for all the affected machines.

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Con Kolivas
On Monday 26 March 2007 08:49, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Monday 26 March 2007 04:28, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > > On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > kernel/sched.c | 51 > > > +++ 1 file changed, 51 > > > insertions(+) > > > >

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Con Kolivas
On Monday 26 March 2007 04:28, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > kernel/sched.c | 51 > > +++ 1 file changed, 51 > > insertions(+) > > 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also fails for me. > > I tried pure 2.6.21-rc4-mm1,

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:28:57 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > kernel/sched.c | 51 +++ > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > > 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also fails for me. > > I

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Torsten Kaiser
On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: kernel/sched.c | 51 +++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also fails for me. I tried pure 2.6.21-rc4-mm1, +hotfixes, +hotfixes+rsdl33 and at last also added above debug patch.

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Con Kolivas wrote: > On Saturday 24 March 2007 08:45, Con Kolivas wrote: >> On Friday 23 March 2007 23:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote: >>> Andy Whitcroft wrote: Con Kolivas wrote: > On Friday 23 March 2007 05:17, Andy Whitcroft wrote: >> Ok, I have yet a third x86_64 machine is is blowing

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Con Kolivas wrote: On Saturday 24 March 2007 08:45, Con Kolivas wrote: On Friday 23 March 2007 23:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote: Andy Whitcroft wrote: Con Kolivas wrote: On Friday 23 March 2007 05:17, Andy Whitcroft wrote: Ok, I have yet a third x86_64 machine is is blowing up with the latest

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Torsten Kaiser
On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kernel/sched.c | 51 +++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also fails for me. I tried pure 2.6.21-rc4-mm1, +hotfixes, +hotfixes+rsdl33 and at last also added above debug patch.

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:28:57 +0100 Torsten Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kernel/sched.c | 51 +++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also fails for me. I tried pure

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Con Kolivas
On Monday 26 March 2007 04:28, Torsten Kaiser wrote: On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kernel/sched.c | 51 +++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also fails for me. I tried pure 2.6.21-rc4-mm1, +hotfixes,

Re: debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-25 Thread Con Kolivas
On Monday 26 March 2007 08:49, Con Kolivas wrote: On Monday 26 March 2007 04:28, Torsten Kaiser wrote: On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kernel/sched.c | 51 +++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also

debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-23 Thread Con Kolivas
On Saturday 24 March 2007 08:45, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Friday 23 March 2007 23:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > > Con Kolivas wrote: > > >> On Friday 23 March 2007 05:17, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > >>> Ok, I have yet a third x86_64 machine is is blowing up with the > > >>>

debug rsdl 0.33

2007-03-23 Thread Con Kolivas
On Saturday 24 March 2007 08:45, Con Kolivas wrote: On Friday 23 March 2007 23:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote: Andy Whitcroft wrote: Con Kolivas wrote: On Friday 23 March 2007 05:17, Andy Whitcroft wrote: Ok, I have yet a third x86_64 machine is is blowing up with the latest