On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2015 21:16:58 Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:03:42AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Monday 25 May 2015 07:01:21 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 21:16:58 Darren Hart wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:03:42AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 25 May 2015 07:01:21 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 21:16:58 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:03:42AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 25 May 2015 07:01:21 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > > Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 21:16:58 Darren Hart wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:03:42AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 25 May 2015 07:01:21 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434 line driver
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:09:30PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 04:40:14PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:44:32 Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:03:42AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 25 May 2015 07:01:21 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434 line driver be
> > > rolled into dell-laptop.c. Any strong
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 04:40:14PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:44:32 Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
>
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 04:40:14PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:44:32 Darren Hart wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:03:42AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 25 May 2015 07:01:21 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434 line driver be
rolled into dell-laptop.c. Any strong opinions?
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:09:30PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 04:40:14PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:44:32 Darren Hart wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:44:32 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > So after I made both config variables =y,
On Monday 25 May 2015 07:01:21 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434 line driver be
> > rolled into dell-laptop.c. Any strong opinions?
>
> Mrm. It's slightly conceptually nasty in that one's an
On Monday 25 May 2015 07:01:21 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434 line driver be
rolled into dell-laptop.c. Any strong opinions?
Mrm. It's slightly conceptually nasty in that one's an ACPI
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:44:32 Darren Hart wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
So after I made both config
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434 line driver be rolled into
> dell-laptop.c. Any strong opinions?
Mrm. It's slightly conceptually nasty in that one's an ACPI driver and
one's calling a Dell custom interface, but I
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
> >
> > wrote:
> > > So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel
> > > built, but died a glorious death
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:44:32PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Greg, Matthew, I'm tempted to recommend this 434 line driver be rolled into
dell-laptop.c. Any strong opinions?
Mrm. It's slightly conceptually nasty in that one's an ACPI driver and
one's calling a Dell custom interface, but I
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:05:36AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel
built, but died a
On Saturday 23 May 2015 03:05:36 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
> >
> > wrote:
> > > So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel
> > > built, but died a glorious death at boot.
>
On Saturday 23 May 2015 03:05:36 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel
built, but died a glorious death
On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
>
> wrote:
> > So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel
> > built, but died a glorious death at boot.
>
> I guess if both are built-in then, according to link order,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
wrote:
> So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel built, but
> died a glorious death at boot.
I guess if both are built-in then, according to link order,
dell-laptop starts first, before dell-rbtn, and dies in
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel built, but
died a glorious death at boot.
I guess if both are built-in then, according to link order,
dell-laptop starts first, before dell-rbtn, and
On Saturday 23 May 2015 00:53:16 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Valdis Kletnieks
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel
built, but died a glorious death at boot.
I guess if both are built-in then, according
So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel built, but
died a glorious death at boot.
Dell Latitude E6530, most current released BIOS.
[1.760739] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0090
[1.760778] IP: [] klist_next+0x1c/0x1d0
[
So after I made both config variables =y, the resulting kernel built, but
died a glorious death at boot.
Dell Latitude E6530, most current released BIOS.
[1.760739] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0090
[1.760778] IP: [a79460cc]
26 matches
Mail list logo
