On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:30:20AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Do I miss some other essential patch ?
>
> If you have used the diff in that URL then you've missed:
>
> x86: Tell irq work about self IPI support
>
> Without that the whole patchset has no effect.
Ok.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:02:40PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:42:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Right, this patchset
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:42:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > > > Right, this patchset fixes it: "[PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick
> > irq work on tick v3"
> >
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:42:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Right, this patchset fixes it: [PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick
irq work on tick v3
I
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:02:40PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:42:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Right, this patchset fixes it: [PATCH
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:30:20AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Do I miss some other essential patch ?
If you have used the diff in that URL then you've missed:
x86: Tell irq work about self IPI support
Without that the whole patchset has no effect.
Ok. Thanks, I'll
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > > > Right, this patchset fixes it: "[PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick irq
> work on tick v3"
> > > >
> > > > I was about to make the pull request, the branch is acked by
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Right, this patchset fixes it: "[PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick irq
> > work on tick v3"
> > >
> > > I was about to make the pull request, the branch is acked by peterz.
> > > Would you like to pull it? It's all
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:24:09PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:46:59AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > > > [] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x58/0x1f0
> > > > [] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30
> > > > [] tick_nohz_restart+0x17/0x90
> > > > []
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:24:09PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:46:59AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
[a10f95f8] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x58/0x1f0
[a10f97aa] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30
[a110a0e7] tick_nohz_restart+0x17/0x90
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Right, this patchset fixes it: [PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick irq
work on tick v3
I was about to make the pull request, the branch is acked by peterz.
Would you like to pull it? It's all merge window
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Right, this patchset fixes it: [PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick irq
work on tick v3
I was about to make the pull request, the branch is acked by peterz.
Would
I think this might be the bug I reported here
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84131
On 2 October 2014 19:24, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:46:59AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > > > [] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x58/0x1f0
> > > > [] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:46:59AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > [] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x58/0x1f0
> > > [] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30
> > > [] tick_nohz_restart+0x17/0x90
> > > [] __tick_nohz_full_check+0xc8/0xe0
> > > [] nohz_full_kick_work_func+0xe/0x10
> > > []
I think this might be the bug I reported here
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84131
On 2 October 2014 19:24, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:46:59AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
[a10f95f8] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x58/0x1f0
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:46:59AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
[a10f95f8] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x58/0x1f0
[a10f97aa] hrtimer_cancel+0x1a/0x30
[a110a0e7] tick_nohz_restart+0x17/0x90
[a110af38] __tick_nohz_full_check+0xc8/0xe0
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > Got this on a box that had been fuzzing for 12 hours or so.
> > There's also some timer stuff going on htere, so cc'ing the usual suspects.
>
> And it's a hrtimer lockup
>
> > [] ?
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> Got this on a box that had been fuzzing for 12 hours or so.
> There's also some timer stuff going on htere, so cc'ing the usual suspects.
And it's a hrtimer lockup
> [] ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x58/0x1f0
> [] ? lock_release+0x1d/0x300
> [] ?
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
Got this on a box that had been fuzzing for 12 hours or so.
There's also some timer stuff going on htere, so cc'ing the usual suspects.
And it's a hrtimer lockup
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
Got this on a box that had been fuzzing for 12 hours or so.
There's also some timer stuff going on htere, so cc'ing the usual suspects.
And it's a hrtimer lockup
[a10f95f8] ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x58/0x1f0
[a10d103d] ?
20 matches
Mail list logo