Re: i8042 lockdep false positive.

2007-04-13 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On 4/13/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 4/13/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false > > positive. Didn't we add

Re: i8042 lockdep false positive.

2007-04-13 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 4/13/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false > > positive. Didn't we add something to the code so that lockdep would > > ignore

Re: i8042 lockdep false positive.

2007-04-13 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi Dave, On 4/13/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false positive. Didn't we add something to the code so that lockdep would ignore what this was doing ? Did we regress? For some reasn lockdep annotations cease to

i8042 lockdep false positive.

2007-04-13 Thread Dave Jones
I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false positive. Didn't we add something to the code so that lockdep would ignore what this was doing ? Did we regress? (This was .21-rc5, during resume) Dave > = > [ INFO:

i8042 lockdep false positive.

2007-04-13 Thread Dave Jones
I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false positive. Didn't we add something to the code so that lockdep would ignore what this was doing ? Did we regress? (This was .21-rc5, during resume) Dave = [ INFO:

Re: i8042 lockdep false positive.

2007-04-13 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi Dave, On 4/13/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false positive. Didn't we add something to the code so that lockdep would ignore what this was doing ? Did we regress? For some reasn lockdep annotations cease to work

Re: i8042 lockdep false positive.

2007-04-13 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi Dave, On 4/13/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false positive. Didn't we add something to the code so that lockdep would ignore what this

Re: i8042 lockdep false positive.

2007-04-13 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On 4/13/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi Dave, On 4/13/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false positive. Didn't we add something to the