On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:22:14PM -0700, Mark Galeck wrote:
> >The answer to "is it desirable to improve X?" is always "yes." But
>
> the only way to make progress in Linux is to actually post patches
> that "improve X." This is unlike many corporate environments, where
> you might need to get
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:22:14PM -0700, Mark Galeck wrote:
The answer to is it desirable to improve X? is always yes. But
the only way to make progress in Linux is to actually post patches
that improve X. This is unlike many corporate environments, where
you might need to get somebody's
>The answer to "is it desirable to improve X?" is always "yes." But
the only way to make progress in Linux is to actually post patches
that "improve X." This is unlike many corporate environments, where
you might need to get somebody's approval
Precisely. Please excuse me coming from a
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>>
>> Does the Linux-Kernel Community perceive that is the case?
>>
>> If so, do you think it is possible to improve?
>>
>> If so, would such an attempt be welcome, including and especially by, the
>> current maintainer(s) of the build?
Hi!
>
> Does the Linux-Kernel Community perceive that is the case?
>
> If so, do you think it is possible to improve?
>
> If so, would such an attempt be welcome, including and especially by, the
> current maintainer(s) of the build? Of course it would have to be completely
>
Hi!
Does the Linux-Kernel Community perceive that is the case?
If so, do you think it is possible to improve?
If so, would such an attempt be welcome, including and especially by, the
current maintainer(s) of the build? Of course it would have to be completely
backwards-compatible,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
Does the Linux-Kernel Community perceive that is the case?
If so, do you think it is possible to improve?
If so, would such an attempt be welcome, including and especially by, the
current maintainer(s) of the build? Of
The answer to is it desirable to improve X? is always yes. But
the only way to make progress in Linux is to actually post patches
that improve X. This is unlike many corporate environments, where
you might need to get somebody's approval
Precisely. Please excuse me coming from a corporate
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 01:46:45AM -0700, Mark Galeck wrote:
> >> Linux kernel build, while correct, is somewhat slow, and the sources
>
> >> could be more readable.
>
> Greg wrote:
> >How is it "slow"?
>
> Well, the proportion of time spent by the CPU cores on activities
> other than
>> Linux kernel build, while correct, is somewhat slow, and the sources
>> could be more readable.
Greg wrote:
>How is it "slow"?
Well, the proportion of time spent by the CPU cores on activities other than
compiling seemed high.
>What "sources" are you referring to as being not readable?
Linux kernel build, while correct, is somewhat slow, and the sources
could be more readable.
Greg wrote:
How is it slow?
Well, the proportion of time spent by the CPU cores on activities other than
compiling seemed high.
What sources are you referring to as being not readable?
Not not
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 01:46:45AM -0700, Mark Galeck wrote:
Linux kernel build, while correct, is somewhat slow, and the sources
could be more readable.
Greg wrote:
How is it slow?
Well, the proportion of time spent by the CPU cores on activities
other than compiling seemed high.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:12:01PM -0700, Mark Galeck wrote:
> Dear Linux-Kernel Community,
>
> I am a consultant specializing in builds, and I recently worked for a
> large client company, a world-wide leader in its field, where I
> overhauled their build system: sped it up by more of an order
Dear Linux-Kernel Community,
I am a consultant specializing in builds, and I recently worked for a large
client company, a world-wide leader in its field, where I overhauled their
build system: sped it up by more of an order of magnitude, and improved
maintainability, for example making
Dear Linux-Kernel Community,
I am a consultant specializing in builds, and I recently worked for a large
client company, a world-wide leader in its field, where I overhauled their
build system: sped it up by more of an order of magnitude, and improved
maintainability, for example making
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:12:01PM -0700, Mark Galeck wrote:
Dear Linux-Kernel Community,
I am a consultant specializing in builds, and I recently worked for a
large client company, a world-wide leader in its field, where I
overhauled their build system: sped it up by more of an order of
16 matches
Mail list logo