Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the slave-dma tree

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:10:56AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Commit > > 966e5e01f420 ("dmaengine: altera: Use macros instead of structs to describe > the registers") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. Oops, missed fixing that up while running with -i :(.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the slave-dma tree

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:10:56AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Commit > > 966e5e01f420 ("dmaengine: altera: Use macros instead of structs to describe > the registers") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. Oops, missed fixing that up while running with -i :(.

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the slave-dma tree

Hi Vinod, Commit 966e5e01f420 ("dmaengine: altera: Use macros instead of structs to describe the registers") is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the slave-dma tree

Hi Vinod, Commit 966e5e01f420 ("dmaengine: altera: Use macros instead of structs to describe the registers") is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell