Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
net/tipc/bearer.c:248: warning: Function parameter or member 'extack' not
described in 'tipc_enable_bearer'
Introduced by commit
b83e214b2e04 ("tipc: add extack messages for bearer/media
Hi all,
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:23:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced this warning:
>
> Sphinx parallel build error:
> docutils.utils.SystemMessage:
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Sphinx parallel build error:
docutils.utils.SystemMessage:
/home/sfr/next/next/Documentation/networking/nf_flowtable.rst:176: (SEVERE/4)
Unexpected section title.
}
...
Introduced by commit
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
include/linux/netdevice.h:2191: warning: Function parameter or member
'dev_refcnt' not described in 'net_device'
Introduced by commit
919067cc845f ("net: add CONFIG_PCPU_DEV_REFCNT")
--
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
net/tipc/subscr.h:73: warning: Function parameter or member 's' not described
in 'tipc_subscription'
Introduced by commit
429189acac53 ("tipc: add host-endian copy of user subscription to
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 06:56:05PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
> defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:6926:12: warning:
> 'e1000e_pm_prepare' defined but
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:6926:12: warning:
'e1000e_pm_prepare' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int e1000e_pm_prepare(struct device *dev)
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Documentation/networking/dsa/dsa.rst:468: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
Documentation/networking/dsa/dsa.rst:477: WARNING: Block quote ends without a
blank line; unexpected unindent.
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Documentation/networking/switchdev.rst:482: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
Introduced by commit
0f22ad45f47c ("Documentation: networking: switchdev: clarify device driver
behavior")
--
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5.rst:16: WARNING:
Unknown target name: "mlx5 port function".
Introduced by commit
142d93d12dc1 ("net/mlx5: Add devlink
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, yesterday's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Documentation/networking/filter.rst:1053: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string
without end-string.
Documentation/networking/filter.rst:1053: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string
without
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 07:01:25AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:40:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > include/linux/phy.h:869: warning:
Hi all,
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:40:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced this warning:
>
> include/linux/phy.h:869: warning: Function parameter or member 'config_intr'
> not described in 'phy_driver'
>
> Introduced
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
include/linux/phy.h:869: warning: Function parameter or member 'config_intr'
not described in 'phy_driver'
Introduced by commit
6527b938426f ("net: phy: remove the .did_interrupt() and
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:20 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced this warning:
>
> Documentation/networking/index.rst:6: WARNING: toctree contains reference to
> nonexisting document 'networking/framerelay'
>
> Introduced
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Documentation/networking/index.rst:6: WARNING: toctree contains reference to
nonexisting document 'networking/framerelay'
Introduced by commit
f73659192b0b ("net: wan: Delete the DLCI / SDLA
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:00:00 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> net/bridge/br_multicast.c: In function 'br_multicast_find_port':
> net/bridge/br_multicast.c:1818:21: warning:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
net/bridge/br_multicast.c: In function 'br_multicast_find_port':
net/bridge/br_multicast.c:1818:21: warning: unused variable 'br'
[-Wunused-variable]
1818 | struct net_bridge *br
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:36 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
> defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/niu.c:9903:12: warning: 'niu_resume' defined but not
> used [-Wunused-function]
> static
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/sun/niu.c:9903:12: warning: 'niu_resume' defined but not
used [-Wunused-function]
static int niu_resume(struct device *dev_d)
^~
y, May 25, 2020 05:40
> > > To: David Miller ; Networking
> > >
> > > Cc: Linux Next Mailing List ; Linux
> > > Kernel Mailing List ; Lifshits, Vitaly
> > > ; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> > >
> > > Subject: linux-next: build warning after mer
x Kernel
> > Mailing
> > List ; Lifshits, Vitaly
> > ;
> > Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> > Subject: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (s
Hi all,
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:17:35 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_uld.c:666:13: warning:
> 'cxgb4_uld_in_use' defined but
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_uld.c:666:13: warning:
'cxgb4_uld_in_use' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
666 | static bool cxgb4_uld_in_use(struct adapter
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Sent: Monday, May 25, 2020 05:40
> To: David Miller ; Networking
>
> Cc: Linux Next Mailing List ; Linux Kernel Mailing
> List ; Lifshits, Vitaly
> ;
> Kirsher, Jeffrey T
> Subject: linux-next: build warni
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64
defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:137:13: warning: 'e1000e_check_me'
defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static bool e1000e_check_me(u16 device_id)
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
> index a7f1a2cdd198..452163eadb98 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_alloc_peer(struct rxrpc_local
> *local, gfp_t gfp)
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
Introduced by commit
033b2c7f0f26 ("rxrpc: Add missing "new peer" trace")
interacting with commit
55f6c98e3674 ("rxrpc: Fix trace-after-put looking at the put peer record")
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/bitmap.h:9,
from include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
from arch/x86/include/asm/cpumask.h:5,
from
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c: In function
'temac_set_multicast_list':
drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c:490:8: warning: 'i' may be used
uninitialized in this
On 2/21/19 5:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c: In function 'rocker_port_attr_set':
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c: In function 'rocker_port_attr_set':
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c:2083:9: warning: this statement may
fall through
Le 2/12/19 à 4:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c: In function 'swdev_port_attr_get':
>
Le 2/12/19 à 4:49 PM, Stephen Rothwell a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c: In function
> 'mlxsw_sp_port_attr_get':
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c: In function 'swdev_port_attr_get':
drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethsw/ethsw.c:646:26: warning: unused variable
'port_priv' [-Wunused-variable]
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c: In function
'mlxsw_sp_port_attr_get':
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c:438:19: warning:
unused
Hi Dave,
On Sun, 03 Feb 2019 20:26:06 -0800 (PST) David Miller
wrote:
>
> Thanks, I just pushed the following:
>
>
> [PATCH] net: Fix fall through warning in y2038 tstamp changes.
>
> net/core/sock.c: In function 'sock_setsockopt':
> net/core/sock.c:914:3: warning: this
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:44:27 +1100
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> net/core/sock.c: In function 'sock_setsockopt':
> net/core/sock.c:914:3: warning: this statement may fall through
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
net/core/sock.c: In function 'sock_setsockopt':
net/core/sock.c:914:3: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW);
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:07:06 -0600 "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
wrote:
>
> On 12/18/18 8:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:24:28 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build
> >>
Hi Stephen,
On 12/18/18 8:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:24:28 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c: In function
Hi all,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 11:24:28 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c: In function 'run_xdp':
>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 08:19:34AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-07-20 7:35 GMT+09:00 Guenter Roeck :
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 08:09:06AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Guenter,
> >>
> >> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:49:01 -0700 Guenter Roeck
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 07/18/2018
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 08:19:34AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-07-20 7:35 GMT+09:00 Guenter Roeck :
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 08:09:06AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Guenter,
> >>
> >> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:49:01 -0700 Guenter Roeck
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 07/18/2018
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
net/core/filter.c: In function 'sk_msg_convert_ctx_access':
net/core/filter.c:6450:6: warning: unused variable 'off' [-Wunused-variable]
int off;
^~~
Introduced by commit
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
net/core/filter.c: In function 'sk_msg_convert_ctx_access':
net/core/filter.c:6450:6: warning: unused variable 'off' [-Wunused-variable]
int off;
^~~
Introduced by commit
On 03/13/2018 10:33 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 06:46:24 -0500
Hi Stephen,
On 03/13/2018 01:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) produced
On 03/13/2018 10:33 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 06:46:24 -0500
Hi Stephen,
On 03/13/2018 01:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) produced this warning:
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 06:46:24 -0500
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 03/13/2018 01:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
>> defconfig) produced this warning:
>> net/core/pktgen.c:
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 06:46:24 -0500
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 03/13/2018 01:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
>> defconfig) produced this warning:
>> net/core/pktgen.c: In function
Hi Stephen,
On 03/13/2018 01:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) produced this warning:
net/core/pktgen.c: In function 'pktgen_if_write':
net/core/pktgen.c:1710:1: warning: the frame size of 1048 bytes is larger
Hi Stephen,
On 03/13/2018 01:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) produced this warning:
net/core/pktgen.c: In function 'pktgen_if_write':
net/core/pktgen.c:1710:1: warning: the frame size of 1048 bytes is larger
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) produced this warning:
net/core/pktgen.c: In function 'pktgen_if_write':
net/core/pktgen.c:1710:1: warning: the frame size of 1048 bytes is larger than
1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
}
^
Introduced by
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
defconfig) produced this warning:
net/core/pktgen.c: In function 'pktgen_if_write':
net/core/pktgen.c:1710:1: warning: the frame size of 1048 bytes is larger than
1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
}
^
Introduced by
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
net/sched/cls_api.c: In function 'tc_dump_tfilter':
net/sched/cls_api.c:1362:8: warning: 'parent' may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
net/sched/cls_api.c: In function 'tc_dump_tfilter':
net/sched/cls_api.c:1362:8: warning: 'parent' may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:02:49 +1100
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c:391:12: warning: 'bcm5482_read_status' defined but
> not used
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:02:49 +1100
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c:391:12: warning: 'bcm5482_read_status' defined but
> not used [-Wunused-function]
> static
Am 04.12.2017 um 01:02 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c:391:12: warning: 'bcm5482_read_status' defined but
> not used [-Wunused-function]
> static
Am 04.12.2017 um 01:02 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c:391:12: warning: 'bcm5482_read_status' defined but
> not used [-Wunused-function]
> static
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c:391:12: warning: 'bcm5482_read_status' defined but
not used [-Wunused-function]
static int bcm5482_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
^
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c:391:12: warning: 'bcm5482_read_status' defined but
not used [-Wunused-function]
static int bcm5482_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
^
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:52:0:
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c: In function 'ibmvnic_open':
include/linux/dma-mapping.h:571:2: warning: 'dma_addr'
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:52:0:
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c: In function 'ibmvnic_open':
include/linux/dma-mapping.h:571:2: warning: 'dma_addr'
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:4:0,
from arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:13,
from
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:4:0,
from arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:13,
from
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:36:47AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c: In function
> '__bpf_lru_list_rotate_inactive.isra.3':
>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:36:47AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c: In function
> '__bpf_lru_list_rotate_inactive.isra.3':
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c: In function '__bpf_lru_list_rotate_inactive.isra.3':
kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:201:28: warning: 'next' may be used uninitialized in
this function
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c: In function '__bpf_lru_list_rotate_inactive.isra.3':
kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:201:28: warning: 'next' may be used uninitialized in
this function
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 23:19:59 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> Fixed thusly:
>>
>>
>> From 36232012344b8db67052432742deaf17f82e70e6 Mon Sep 17
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 23:19:59 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> Fixed thusly:
>>
>>
>> From 36232012344b8db67052432742deaf17f82e70e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "David S. Miller"
>> Date:
Hi David,
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 23:19:59 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> Fixed thusly:
>
>
> From 36232012344b8db67052432742deaf17f82e70e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "David S. Miller"
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 23:19:29
Hi David,
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 23:19:59 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> Fixed thusly:
>
>
> From 36232012344b8db67052432742deaf17f82e70e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "David S. Miller"
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 23:19:29 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] xgene: Fix build
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:15:33 +1000
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_hw.c: In function
>
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:15:33 +1000
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_hw.c: In function
> 'xgene_enet_phy_connect':
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_hw.c: In function
'xgene_enet_phy_connect':
drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_hw.c:759:22: warning: unused variable
'adev'
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_hw.c: In function
'xgene_enet_phy_connect':
drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_hw.c:759:22: warning: unused variable
'adev'
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 04:13:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning (CONFIG_MPLS is disabled):
>
> net/ipv4/tunnel4.c: In function 'tunnel4_init':
> net/ipv4/tunnel4.c:223:1:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 04:13:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning (CONFIG_MPLS is disabled):
>
> net/ipv4/tunnel4.c: In function 'tunnel4_init':
> net/ipv4/tunnel4.c:223:1:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning (CONFIG_MPLS is disabled):
net/ipv4/tunnel4.c: In function 'tunnel4_init':
net/ipv4/tunnel4.c:223:1: warning: label 'err_mpls' defined but not used
[-Wunused-label]
err_mpls:
^
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning (CONFIG_MPLS is disabled):
net/ipv4/tunnel4.c: In function 'tunnel4_init':
net/ipv4/tunnel4.c:223:1: warning: label 'err_mpls' defined but not used
[-Wunused-label]
err_mpls:
^
On 2016年07月04日 11:15, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/tun.c: In function 'tun_do_read.part.5':
/home/sfr/next/next/drivers/net/tun.c:1491:6: warning: 'err' may be used
On 2016年07月04日 11:15, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/tun.c: In function 'tun_do_read.part.5':
/home/sfr/next/next/drivers/net/tun.c:1491:6: warning: 'err' may be used
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/tun.c: In function 'tun_do_read.part.5':
/home/sfr/next/next/drivers/net/tun.c:1491:6: warning: 'err' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/tun.c: In function 'tun_do_read.part.5':
/home/sfr/next/next/drivers/net/tun.c:1491:6: warning: 'err' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
On 02/15/2016 04:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> net/ipv4/igmp.c: In function 'igmp_group_added':
> net/ipv4/igmp.c:1227:14: warning: unused variable 'net'
On 02/15/2016 04:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> net/ipv4/igmp.c: In function 'igmp_group_added':
> net/ipv4/igmp.c:1227:14: warning: unused variable 'net'
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
net/ipv4/igmp.c: In function 'igmp_group_added':
net/ipv4/igmp.c:1227:14: warning: unused variable 'net' [-Wunused-variable]
struct net *net = dev_net(in_dev->dev);
^
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
net/ipv4/igmp.c: In function 'igmp_group_added':
net/ipv4/igmp.c:1227:14: warning: unused variable 'net' [-Wunused-variable]
struct net *net = dev_net(in_dev->dev);
^
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:43 AM, David Miller wrote:
>
> I've just pushed out a fix for this, thanks everyone.
Thanks, David!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
From: Cong Wang
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:39:20 -0700
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allnoconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>>
>> include/net/ip.h:211:5: warning:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig) produced this warning:
>
>
> include/net/ip.h:211:5: warning: "CONFIG_SYSCTL" is not defined [-Wundef]
> #if CONFIG_SYSCTL
> ^
>
>
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) produced this warning:
include/net/ip.h:211:5: warning: "CONFIG_SYSCTL" is not defined [-Wundef]
#if CONFIG_SYSCTL
^
Introduced by commit 122ff243f5f1 ("ipv4: make ip_local_reserved_ports
per netns").
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) produced this warning:
include/net/ip.h:211:5: warning: CONFIG_SYSCTL is not defined [-Wundef]
#if CONFIG_SYSCTL
^
Introduced by commit 122ff243f5f1 (ipv4: make ip_local_reserved_ports
per netns).
--
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) produced this warning:
include/net/ip.h:211:5: warning: CONFIG_SYSCTL is not defined [-Wundef]
#if CONFIG_SYSCTL
^
From: Cong Wang xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:39:20 -0700
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) produced this warning:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:43 AM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
I've just pushed out a fix for this, thanks everyone.
Thanks, David!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_io.c: In function
'qlcnic_send_filter':
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_io.c:349:3: warning: passing argument
2 of
Hi all,
After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_io.c: In function
'qlcnic_send_filter':
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qlcnic/qlcnic_io.c:349:3: warning: passing argument
2 of
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo