Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2019-01-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 1:06 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in: > > Makefile > > between commit: > > b57304bb03de ("kbuild: remove meaningless prepare2 target") > > from the kbuild tree and patch: > > "locking/atomics:

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2019-01-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in: Makefile between commit: b57304bb03de ("kbuild: remove meaningless prepare2 target") from the kbuild tree and patch: "locking/atomics: build atomic headers as required" from the akpm tree. I fixed it up (I hope -

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2017-07-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in: arch/xtensa/include/asm/Kbuild between commit: 35ff5ae79f85 ("xtensa: move generic-y of exported headers to uapi/asm/Kbuild") from the kbuild tree and patch: "xtensa: use generic fb.h" from the akpm tree. I fixed it

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2017-07-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in: arch/xtensa/include/asm/Kbuild between commit: 35ff5ae79f85 ("xtensa: move generic-y of exported headers to uapi/asm/Kbuild") from the kbuild tree and patch: "xtensa: use generic fb.h" from the akpm tree. I fixed it

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-07-04 Thread Michal Marek
On 4.7.2013 06:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:33:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in >> tools/include/tools/be_byteshift.h and tools/include/tools/le_byteshift.h >> between commit b35310627f39

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-07-04 Thread Michal Marek
On 4.7.2013 06:43, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:33:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in tools/include/tools/be_byteshift.h and tools/include/tools/le_byteshift.h between commit

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-07-03 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:33:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in > tools/include/tools/be_byteshift.h and tools/include/tools/le_byteshift.h > between commit b35310627f39 ("tools/include: use stdint types for > user-space

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-07-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in tools/include/tools/be_byteshift.h and tools/include/tools/le_byteshift.h between commit b35310627f39 ("tools/include: use stdint types for user-space byteshift headers") from the kbuild tree and commit "scripts/sortextable.c:

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-07-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in tools/include/tools/be_byteshift.h and tools/include/tools/le_byteshift.h between commit b35310627f39 (tools/include: use stdint types for user-space byteshift headers) from the kbuild tree and commit scripts/sortextable.c: fix

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-07-03 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:33:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in tools/include/tools/be_byteshift.h and tools/include/tools/le_byteshift.h between commit b35310627f39 (tools/include: use stdint types for

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-02-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in kernel/timeconst.pl between commit 70730bca1331 ("kernel: Replace timeconst.pl with a bc script") from the kbuild tree and commit "timeconst.pl: remove deprecated defined(@array)" from the akpm tree. I just dropped the akpm

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-02-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in kernel/timeconst.pl between commit 70730bca1331 (kernel: Replace timeconst.pl with a bc script) from the kbuild tree and commit timeconst.pl: remove deprecated defined(@array) from the akpm tree. I just dropped the akpm tree

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-01-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in scripts/tags.sh between commit 9f14b4201239 ("scripts/tags.sh: Fix regex syntax for etags") from the kbuild tree and commit "scripts/tags.sh: add magic for declarations of popular kernel type" from the akpm tree. I fixed it

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree

2013-01-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in scripts/tags.sh between commit 9f14b4201239 (scripts/tags.sh: Fix regex syntax for etags) from the kbuild tree and commit scripts/tags.sh: add magic for declarations of popular kernel type from the akpm tree. I fixed it up