Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2020-11-30 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:21:20AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:03:36PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > > > arch/x86/pci/i386.c > > > > between commit: > > > > ace091d17272

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2020-11-30 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:03:36PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/pci/i386.c > > between commit: > > ace091d17272 ("x86/PCI: Fix kernel-doc markup") > > from the pci tree and commit: > > 638920a66a17

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2020-11-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/pci/i386.c between commit: ace091d17272 ("x86/PCI: Fix kernel-doc markup") from the pci tree and commit: 638920a66a17 ("x86/PCI: Make a kernel-doc comment a normal one") from the tip tree. I fixed it up (I

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2020-10-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:35:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c > > between commit: > > 2705b8e4d46f ("x86/apic/msi: Use Real PCI DMA device when configuring IRTE") > > from the pci tree

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2020-10-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:21:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c > > between commit: > > 42443f036042 ("PCI: vmd: Create IRQ Domain configuration helper") > > from the pci tree and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2020-10-01 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 04:38:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/pci/xen.c > > between commit: > > b0623566c2e9 ("x86/xen: Fix xen_msi_init() missing prototype warning") I dropped this from my tree,

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2020-10-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/pci/xen.c between commit: b0623566c2e9 ("x86/xen: Fix xen_msi_init() missing prototype warning") from the pci tree and commit: 2905c50b7d3e ("x86/xen: Make xen_msi_init() static and rename it to

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2020-09-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c between commit: 2705b8e4d46f ("x86/apic/msi: Use Real PCI DMA device when configuring IRTE") from the pci tree and commit: 7ca435cf857d ("x86/irq: Cleanup the arch_*_msi_irqs() leftovers")

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2020-09-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c between commit: 42443f036042 ("PCI: vmd: Create IRQ Domain configuration helper") from the pci tree and commit: 585dfe8abc44 ("PCI: vmd: Dont abuse vector irqomain as parent") from the tip

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2017-06-28 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 01:15:34PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2017-06-28 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 01:15:34PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2017-06-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: kernel/irq/affinity.c between commit: 6f9a22bc5775 ("PCI/MSI: Ignore affinity if pre/post vector count is more than min_vecs") from the pci tree and commit: 9a0ef98e186d ("genirq/affinity: Assign vectors to all

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2017-06-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: kernel/irq/affinity.c between commit: 6f9a22bc5775 ("PCI/MSI: Ignore affinity if pre/post vector count is more than min_vecs") from the pci tree and commit: 9a0ef98e186d ("genirq/affinity: Assign vectors to all

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2016-12-12 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:38:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/pci/msi.c > > between commit: > > 67f1e4473857 ("PCI/MSI: Document new parameter for msi_capability_init()") > > from the pci tree and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2016-12-12 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:38:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/pci/msi.c > > between commit: > > 67f1e4473857 ("PCI/MSI: Document new parameter for msi_capability_init()") > > from the pci tree and

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2016-12-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: drivers/pci/msi.c between commit: 67f1e4473857 ("PCI/MSI: Document new parameter for msi_capability_init()") from the pci tree and commit: 61e1c5905290 ("PCI/MSI: Propagate IRQ affinity description through the MSI

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2016-12-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: drivers/pci/msi.c between commit: 67f1e4473857 ("PCI/MSI: Document new parameter for msi_capability_init()") from the pci tree and commit: 61e1c5905290 ("PCI/MSI: Propagate IRQ affinity description through the MSI

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-11-24 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in > drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c between commit 3c70637f7569 ("PCI: rcar: > Make rcar_pci static") from the pci tree and commit 7c35c8cc32f3 ("PCI: > rcar: Save MSI controller in pci_sys_data")

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-11-24 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c between commit 3c70637f7569 (PCI: rcar: Make rcar_pci static) from the pci tree and commit 7c35c8cc32f3 (PCI: rcar: Save MSI controller in pci_sys_data) from the

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-11-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c between commit 3c70637f7569 ("PCI: rcar: Make rcar_pci static") from the pci tree and commit 7c35c8cc32f3 ("PCI: rcar: Save MSI controller in pci_sys_data") from the tip tree. I fixed it up (see

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-11-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c between commit 3c70637f7569 (PCI: rcar: Make rcar_pci static) from the pci tree and commit 7c35c8cc32f3 (PCI: rcar: Save MSI controller in pci_sys_data) from the tip tree. I fixed it up (see below)

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-03-12 Thread Mark Brown
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h between commit 25453e9e521382 ("x86/PCI: Remove mp_bus_to_node[], set_mp_bus_to_node(), get_mp_bus_to_node()") from the pci tree and commit 36fc5500bb1907bea7e ("sched: Remove unused mc_capable()

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-03-12 Thread Mark Brown
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h between commit 25453e9e521382 (x86/PCI: Remove mp_bus_to_node[], set_mp_bus_to_node(), get_mp_bus_to_node()) from the pci tree and commit 36fc5500bb1907bea7e (sched: Remove unused mc_capable()

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-03-03 Thread Liviu Dudau
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 06:03:35AM +, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in > drivers/pci/Makefile between commit 39656f29f665 ("PCI: Cleanup per-arch > list of object files") from the pci tree and commit c5f9ee3d665a ("x86, >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-03-03 Thread Liviu Dudau
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 06:03:35AM +, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in drivers/pci/Makefile between commit 39656f29f665 (PCI: Cleanup per-arch list of object files) from the pci tree and commit c5f9ee3d665a (x86, platforms:

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-03-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in arch/x86/pci/numaq_32.c and arch/x86/pci/visws.c between commit 8d7d818676d3 ("x86/PCI: Use pcibios_scan_root() instead of pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata()") from the pci tree and commits c5f9ee3d665a ("x86, platforms: Remove SGI Visual

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-03-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in drivers/pci/Makefile between commit 39656f29f665 ("PCI: Cleanup per-arch list of object files") from the pci tree and commit c5f9ee3d665a ("x86, platforms: Remove SGI Visual Workstation") from the tip tree. I fixed it up (see

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-03-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in drivers/pci/Makefile between commit 39656f29f665 (PCI: Cleanup per-arch list of object files) from the pci tree and commit c5f9ee3d665a (x86, platforms: Remove SGI Visual Workstation) from the tip tree. I fixed it up (see below)

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2014-03-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in arch/x86/pci/numaq_32.c and arch/x86/pci/visws.c between commit 8d7d818676d3 (x86/PCI: Use pcibios_scan_root() instead of pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata()) from the pci tree and commits c5f9ee3d665a (x86, platforms: Remove SGI Visual

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2013-10-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in include/linux/acpi.h between commit c8678473609b ("ACPI: Tidy acpi_run_osc () declarations") from the pci tree and commit 4b3db708b114 ("ACPI, x86: Extended error log driver for x86 platform") from the tip tree. I fixed it up

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree

2013-10-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in include/linux/acpi.h between commit c8678473609b (ACPI: Tidy acpi_run_osc () declarations) from the pci tree and commit 4b3db708b114 (ACPI, x86: Extended error log driver for x86 platform) from the tip tree. I fixed it up (see