; Martin K.
Petersen; target-devel; Sagi Grimberg; linux-kernel
Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans
Sure, no problem.
Do you have a git tree with the latest versions of all the changes you want for
3.15 in a branch? That would be helpful as I catch up on applying things, so
that I don't
; Martin K.
Petersen; target-devel; Sagi Grimberg; linux-kernel
Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans
Sure, no problem.
Do you have a git tree with the latest versions of all the changes you want for
3.15 in a branch? That would be helpful as I catch up on applying things, so
that I don't
Dreier
> Cc: Or Gerlitz; Hefty Sean; linux-rdma; Martin K. Petersen; target-devel;
> Sagi Grimberg; linux-kernel
> Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans
>
> On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 07:18 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
>
; linux-rdma; Martin K. Petersen; target-devel;
Sagi Grimberg; linux-kernel
Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 07:18 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
That all said, do you have
...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas A. Bellinger
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:34 AM
To: Roland Dreier
Cc: Or Gerlitz; Hefty Sean; linux-rdma; Martin K. Petersen; target-devel; Sagi
Grimberg; linux-kernel
Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 07:18 -0800, Roland Dreier
...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas A. Bellinger
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:34 AM
To: Roland Dreier
Cc: Or Gerlitz; Hefty Sean; linux-rdma; Martin K. Petersen; target-devel; Sagi
Grimberg; linux-kernel
Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 07:18 -0800, Roland Dreier
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 07:18 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
> wrote:
> > That all said, do you have an objection wrt taking this bits through
> > target-pending..? Given the dependencies involved, that would seem the
> > most logical path to
On 05/03/2014 17:18, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
wrote:
>That all said, do you have an objection wrt taking this bits through
>target-pending..? Given the dependencies involved, that would seem the
>most logical path to take.
Perhaps not
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
wrote:
> That all said, do you have an objection wrt taking this bits through
> target-pending..? Given the dependencies involved, that would seem the
> most logical path to take.
Perhaps not surprisingly, I would prefer to get a chance to
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 16:04 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
> wrote:
> > Can you give us an estimate of when you'll have some time to give
> > feedback on the outstanding patches..?
>
> I hope to get to it in the next few weeks.
>
> - R.
Hi
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 16:04 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
Can you give us an estimate of when you'll have some time to give
feedback on the outstanding patches..?
I hope to get to it in the next few weeks.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
That all said, do you have an objection wrt taking this bits through
target-pending..? Given the dependencies involved, that would seem the
most logical path to take.
Perhaps not surprisingly, I would prefer to
On 05/03/2014 17:18, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
That all said, do you have an objection wrt taking this bits through
target-pending..? Given the dependencies involved, that would seem the
most logical path to take.
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 07:18 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
That all said, do you have an objection wrt taking this bits through
target-pending..? Given the dependencies involved, that would seem the
most
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
> wrote:
>> Can you give us an estimate of when you'll have some time to give
>> feedback on the outstanding patches..?
>
> I hope to get to it in the next few weeks.
Hi Roland,
So
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
Can you give us an estimate of when you'll have some time to give
feedback on the outstanding patches..?
I hope to get to it in the next
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
wrote:
> Can you give us an estimate of when you'll have some time to give
> feedback on the outstanding patches..?
I hope to get to it in the next few weeks.
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Hi Roland,
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 23:27 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Roland & Co,
>
> On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 16:43 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted > three months ago. We
> > > deserve
Hi Roland,
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 23:27 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Roland Co,
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 16:43 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted three months ago. We
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
Can you give us an estimate of when you'll have some time to give
feedback on the outstanding patches..?
I hope to get to it in the next few weeks.
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> On 1/22/2014 2:43 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted > three months ago. We
>>> deserve a response from the maintainer that goes beyond "I need to
>>> think on
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014, Sagi Grimberg sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote:
On 1/22/2014 2:43 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted three months ago. We
deserve a response from the maintainer that goes
Roland & Co,
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 16:43 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted > three months ago. We
> > deserve a response from the maintainer that goes beyond "I need to
> > think on that".
> >
> >
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted > three months ago. We
>> deserve a response from the maintainer that goes beyond "I need to
>> think on that".
>>
>> Responsiveness was
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted > three months ago. We
> deserve a response from the maintainer that goes beyond "I need to
> think on that".
>
> Responsiveness was stated by Linus to be the #1 requirement from
> kernel
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014, sagi grimberg wrote:
>> Thanks Nic, let me elaborate on this,
[...]
>> Hope this helps,
> Hi Roland, with Nic's && Sagi's answers @ hand, were your questions resolved?
Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted > three
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014, sagi grimberg sa...@mellanox.com wrote:
Thanks Nic, let me elaborate on this,
[...]
Hope this helps,
Hi Roland, with Nic's Sagi's answers @ hand, were your questions resolved?
Roland, ping! the signature
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted three months ago. We
deserve a response from the maintainer that goes beyond I need to
think on that.
Responsiveness was stated by Linus to be the #1 requirement from
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted three months ago. We
deserve a response from the maintainer that goes beyond I need to
think on that.
Roland Co,
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 16:43 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
Roland, ping! the signature patches were posted three months ago. We
deserve a response from the maintainer that goes beyond I need to
think on that.
30 matches
Mail list logo
