On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:54:28AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Just FYI, this solves the orig issue for me as well. ;)
>
> Thanks for all the work in tracking it down...
>
> Tested-by: Kevin Fenzi
And thank you for testing as well!
Just FYI, this solves the orig issue for me as well. ;)
Thanks for all the work in tracking it down...
Tested-by: Kevin Fenzi
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue-10/28/14-2014 05:50, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Mon-10/27/14-2014 10:45, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Mon-10/27/14-2014 10:45, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > > > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >
>
On Mon-10/27/14-2014 10:45, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > >
On Mon-10/27/14-2014 10:45, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Mon-10/27/14-2014 10:45, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On Tue-10/28/14-2014 05:50, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Mon-10/27/14-2014 10:45, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh
Just FYI, this solves the orig issue for me as well. ;)
Thanks for all the work in tracking it down...
Tested-by: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:54:28AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Just FYI, this solves the orig issue for me as well. ;)
Thanks for all the work in tracking it down...
Tested-by: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
And thank you for testing as well!
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:43:21PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >> > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> >
>> > >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> > >> Looking at the
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > >> Looking at the dmesg, the early boot messages seem to be
>
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Looking at the dmesg, the early boot messages
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:43:21PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:18:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:20:48PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> Hmmm... It
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 14:49, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 03:09:36PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 14:49, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:20:48PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> Hmmm... It sure looks like we have some callbacks stuck here. I clearly
>> >> need to take
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> Looking at the dmesg, the early boot messages seem to be
>> confused as to how many CPUs there are, e.g.,
>>
>> [0.00] SLUB: HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=4, Nodes=1
>> [
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >>Looking at the dmesg, the early boot messages seem to be
> >> confused as to how many CPUs there are, e.g.,
> >>
> >> [0.00]
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:38:16AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Looking at the dmesg, the early boot messages seem to be
confused as to how many CPUs there are, e.g.,
[
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Looking at the dmesg, the early boot messages seem to be
confused as to how many CPUs there are, e.g.,
[0.00] SLUB: HWalign=64, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=4,
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:20:48PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...]
Hmmm... It sure looks like we have some callbacks
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 03:09:36PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 14:49, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 14:49, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . .
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:33:33PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:20:48PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:20:48PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> [...]
> >> Hmmm... It sure looks like we have some callbacks stuck here. I clearly
> >> need to take a hard look at the sleep/wakeup
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...]
>> Hmmm... It sure looks like we have some callbacks stuck here. I clearly
>> need to take a hard look at the sleep/wakeup code.
>>
>> Thank you for running this!!!
>
>Could you please try the
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:34:07PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > >On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > >> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >> >
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:34:07PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> >> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> >> > > On
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:02:04PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>
[...]
>> I've got an ftrace capture from unmodified -net, it looks like
>> this:
>>
>> ovs-vswitchd-902 [000] 471.778441: rcu_barrier: rcu_sched Begin
>> cpu
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>> > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
>[ . . . ]
>
>> > > >
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:02:04PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> >> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> >> > > On
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>> > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
>[ . . . ]
>
>> > > >
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > > > Well, if you are feeling aggressive,
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:57:53AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:49:48AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > >> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >> >
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:49:48AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> >> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> >> > > On
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>> > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> > > > On Fri, Oct 24,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:20:11AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:48:34PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> [...]
> >> >Either way, my patch assumed that 39953dfd4007 (rcu: Avoid misordering in
> >>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:48:34PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...]
>> >Either way, my patch assumed that 39953dfd4007 (rcu: Avoid misordering in
>> >__call_rcu_nocb_enqueue()) would work and that 1772947bd012 (rcu: Handle
>> >NOCB callbacks
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:48:34PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E.
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:48:34PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 15:04, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:08:57PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 08:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:48:34PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
[...]
Either way, my patch assumed that 39953dfd4007 (rcu: Avoid misordering in
__call_rcu_nocb_enqueue()) would work and that
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:20:11AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:48:34PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
[...]
Either way, my patch assumed that 39953dfd4007 (rcu:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:49:48AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:57:53AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:49:48AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:09:31PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 09:54, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
Well, if you are feeling aggressive, give the
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:02:04PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 10:20, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:02:04PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
[...]
I've got an ftrace capture from unmodified -net, it looks like
this:
ovs-vswitchd-902 [000]
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:34:07PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 08:35:26PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:34:07PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:57AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Fri-10/24/14-2014 11:32, Paul E. McKenney
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...]
Hmmm... It sure looks like we have some callbacks stuck here. I clearly
need to take a hard look at the sleep/wakeup code.
Thank you for running this!!!
Could you
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:20:48PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...]
Hmmm... It sure looks like we have some callbacks stuck here. I clearly
need to take a hard look at
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>> > > On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> > > > On Thu,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:11:26PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2014 11:37 AM, "Paul E. McKenney"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > > On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > > On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > > wrote:
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > > > Don't get me wrong -- the
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
[ . . . ]
Don't get me wrong
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:11:26PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Oct 23, 2014 11:37 AM, Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-22
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:24 -0700, Paul E.
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:09:26AM +0300, Yanko
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 05:27:50AM -0700, Paul E.
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:45:40AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:51:59PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Thu-10/23/14-2014 08:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:40:32AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > > Don't get me wrong -- the fact that this kthread appears to have
> > > blocked within rcu_barrier() for
On Wed-10/22/14-2014 15:33, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 01:25:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:53:24PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> >>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 01:25:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:53:24PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> Cong Wang writes:
>> >>
>> >> > (Adding Paul and Eric in
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 01:25:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:53:24PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Cong Wang writes:
> >>
> >> > (Adding Paul and Eric in Cc)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Josh
"Paul E. McKenney" writes:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:53:24PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Cong Wang writes:
>>
>> > (Adding Paul and Eric in Cc)
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Josh Boyer
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Someone else is seeing this when they try and modprobe
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:53:24PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Cong Wang writes:
>
> > (Adding Paul and Eric in Cc)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Josh Boyer
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Someone else is seeing this when they try and modprobe ppp_generic:
> >>
> >> [ 240.599195]
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:37:53AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> (Adding Paul and Eric in Cc)
>>
>> I am not aware of any change in net/core/dev.c related here,
>> so I guess it's a bug in rcu_barrier().
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Does commit
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:37:53AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> (Adding Paul and Eric in Cc)
>
> I am not aware of any change in net/core/dev.c related here,
> so I guess it's a bug in rcu_barrier().
>
> Thanks.
Does commit 789cbbeca4e (workqueue: Add quiescent state between work items)
and
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo