From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:57:58 +0900
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:41:42 -0800 (PST)
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:03:43 +0900
> >
> > > [PATCH] sparc64: make IOMMU
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:57:58 +0900
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:41:42 -0800 (PST)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:03:43 +0900
[PATCH] sparc64: make IOMMU code respect the
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:41:42 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:03:43 +0900
>
> > [PATCH] sparc64: make IOMMU code respect the segment boundary limits
> >
> > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:41:42 -0800 (PST)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:03:43 +0900
[PATCH] sparc64: make IOMMU code respect the segment boundary limits
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:03:43 +0900
> [PATCH] sparc64: make IOMMU code respect the segment boundary limits
>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looks good, but I think it will break sound for some ALI chips.
Please see
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:03:43 +0900
[PATCH] sparc64: make IOMMU code respect the segment boundary limits
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks good, but I think it will break sound for some ALI chips.
Please see
Sorry for the late response,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:40:36 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:38:01 +0900
>
> > Great, thanks! SPARC IOMMUs use bitmap for the free area management
> > like POWER IOMMUs so it
Sorry for the late response,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:40:36 -0800 (PST)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:38:01 +0900
Great, thanks! SPARC IOMMUs use bitmap for the free area management
like POWER IOMMUs so it could use
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:38:01 +0900
> Great, thanks! SPARC IOMMUs use bitmap for the free area management
> like POWER IOMMUs so it could use lib/iommu-helper as POWER does.
Please look at Linus's current tree, I believe I have things
in a working
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:38:01 +0900
Great, thanks! SPARC IOMMUs use bitmap for the free area management
like POWER IOMMUs so it could use lib/iommu-helper as POWER does.
Please look at Linus's current tree, I believe I have things
in a working state,
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:01:47 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:53:33 +0900
>
> > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800 (PST)
> > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I intend to put merging back
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:53:33 +0900
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800 (PST)
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I intend to put merging back in, perhaps something similar to
> > powerpc's merging logic but without the expensive (in my
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:12:36 +0900
>
> > Really sorry about it.
>
> I am happy to test patches you send to me in the future :-)
Thanks a lot.
> > PARISC, Alpha,
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:12:36 +0900
> Really sorry about it.
I am happy to test patches you send to me in the future :-)
> PARISC, Alpha, and IA64 IOMMUs use the two-pass algorithm like SPARC
> but their first pass decides how to merge sg entires (and
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:41:38 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The sparc64 change:
>
> commit fde6a3c82d67f592eb587be4d1b0ae6d4321
> Author: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon Feb 4 22:28:02 2008 -0800
>
> iommu sg merging: sparc64: make
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:41:38 -0800 (PST)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sparc64 change:
commit fde6a3c82d67f592eb587be4d1b0ae6d4321
Author: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Feb 4 22:28:02 2008 -0800
iommu sg merging: sparc64: make iommu
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:12:36 +0900
Really sorry about it.
I am happy to test patches you send to me in the future :-)
PARISC, Alpha, and IA64 IOMMUs use the two-pass algorithm like SPARC
but their first pass decides how to merge sg entires (and
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:53:33 +0900
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800 (PST)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to put merging back in, perhaps something similar to
powerpc's merging logic but without the expensive (in my opinion)
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:01:47 -0800 (PST)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:53:33 +0900
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800 (PST)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to put merging back in, perhaps
The sparc64 change:
commit fde6a3c82d67f592eb587be4d1b0ae6d4321
Author: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Feb 4 22:28:02 2008 -0800
iommu sg merging: sparc64: make iommu respect the segment size limits
This patch makes iommu respect segment size limits
The sparc64 change:
commit fde6a3c82d67f592eb587be4d1b0ae6d4321
Author: FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Feb 4 22:28:02 2008 -0800
iommu sg merging: sparc64: make iommu respect the segment size limits
This patch makes iommu respect segment size limits
21 matches
Mail list logo
