Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-27 Thread Hugues FRUCHET
Hi Nikolaus, I would propose to work first on YUV support, so you can test a YUV VGA grabbing using your OMPA3 setup, I will add this support then in patch serie. For the co-work, let's continue on IRC (irc.freenode.net), chat #v4l, my pseudo is "hfr". BR, Hugues. On 06/26/2017 06:28 PM, H.

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-27 Thread Hugues FRUCHET
Hi Nikolaus, I would propose to work first on YUV support, so you can test a YUV VGA grabbing using your OMPA3 setup, I will add this support then in patch serie. For the co-work, let's continue on IRC (irc.freenode.net), chat #v4l, my pseudo is "hfr". BR, Hugues. On 06/26/2017 06:28 PM, H.

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread H. Nikolaus Schaller
> Am 26.06.2017 um 13:16 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > Hi! > >>> You may want to try this one: >>> >>> commit 0eae9d2a8f096f703cbc8f9a0ab155cd3cc14cef >>> Author: Pavel >>> Date: Mon Feb 13 21:26:51 2017 +0100 >>> >>> omap3isp: fix VP2SDR bit so capture (not

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread H. Nikolaus Schaller
> Am 26.06.2017 um 13:16 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > Hi! > >>> You may want to try this one: >>> >>> commit 0eae9d2a8f096f703cbc8f9a0ab155cd3cc14cef >>> Author: Pavel >>> Date: Mon Feb 13 21:26:51 2017 +0100 >>> >>> omap3isp: fix VP2SDR bit so capture (not preview) works >>> >>> This

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread Hugues FRUCHET
Nikolaus, some comments about pixel format/resolution below: On 06/26/2017 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >>> Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : >>> >>> Hi! >>> * unfortunately we still get no

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread Hugues FRUCHET
Nikolaus, some comments about pixel format/resolution below: On 06/26/2017 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >>> Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : >>> >>> Hi! >>> * unfortunately we still get no image :(

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > You may want to try this one: > > > > commit 0eae9d2a8f096f703cbc8f9a0ab155cd3cc14cef > > Author: Pavel > > Date: Mon Feb 13 21:26:51 2017 +0100 > > > >omap3isp: fix VP2SDR bit so capture (not preview) works > > > >This is neccessary for capture (not preview)

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > You may want to try this one: > > > > commit 0eae9d2a8f096f703cbc8f9a0ab155cd3cc14cef > > Author: Pavel > > Date: Mon Feb 13 21:26:51 2017 +0100 > > > >omap3isp: fix VP2SDR bit so capture (not preview) works > > > >This is neccessary for capture (not preview) to work

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread H. Nikolaus Schaller
Hi Pavel, > Am 26.06.2017 um 10:39 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >>> Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : >>> >>> Hi! >>> * unfortunately we still get no image :( The

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread H. Nikolaus Schaller
Hi Pavel, > Am 26.06.2017 um 10:39 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >>> Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : >>> >>> Hi! >>> * unfortunately we still get no image :( The latter is likely a setup issue

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > > Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > > > Hi! > > > >> * unfortunately we still get no image :( > >> > >> The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = > >> Image

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2017-06-26 08:05:04, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > > Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > > > Hi! > > > >> * unfortunately we still get no image :( > >> > >> The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = > >> Image Signal Processor)

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread H. Nikolaus Schaller
Hi Pavel, > Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > Hi! > >> * unfortunately we still get no image :( >> >> The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = >> Image Signal Processor) which >> we were not yet able to solve. Oscilloscoping signals

Re: omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-26 Thread H. Nikolaus Schaller
Hi Pavel, > Am 25.06.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Pavel Machek : > > Hi! > >> * unfortunately we still get no image :( >> >> The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = >> Image Signal Processor) which >> we were not yet able to solve. Oscilloscoping signals on the

omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > * unfortunately we still get no image :( > > The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = Image > Signal Processor) which > we were not yet able to solve. Oscilloscoping signals on the interface > indicated that signals and > sync are correct. But we do not

omap3isp camera was Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Add support of OV9655 camera

2017-06-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > * unfortunately we still get no image :( > > The latter is likely a setup issue of our camera interface (OMAP3 ISP = Image > Signal Processor) which > we were not yet able to solve. Oscilloscoping signals on the interface > indicated that signals and > sync are correct. But we do not