On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> Richard is asking for source code. Documentation/Changes only gives the
> location of binaries.
>
> This is a bit of a problem IMO (I also tried, and failed, to find the egcs
> 1.1.2 source code). Now that I know where it is, I'll soon post a patch
>
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> [snip]
> > > None of the named compilers gripe? Where, prey tell, do I get the source-
> > > code of a compiler that works? The only source provided in the site
> > > listed in
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
[snip]
> > None of the named compilers gripe? Where, prey tell, do I get the source-
> > code of a compiler that works? The only source provided in the site
> > listed in the Documentation does not.
>
> It's not the only
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > Seriously though, the constraints look fine to me (and the register
> > name is there in the output constraint). I'd say you have a busted
> > compiler. None of the named compilers gripe.
> >
>
>
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> > There is an error at line 80 in linux-2.4.0/include/asm/posix_types.h
> > which prevents source-code from being compiled using the new C compiler
> > that I was forced to install in
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
Hi Richard,
There is an error at line 80 in linux-2.4.0/include/asm/posix_types.h
which prevents source-code from being compiled using the new C compiler
that I was forced to install in order to
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Seriously though, the constraints look fine to me (and the register
name is there in the output constraint). I'd say you have a busted
compiler. None of the named compilers gripe.
None of the
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
[snip]
None of the named compilers gripe? Where, prey tell, do I get the source-
code of a compiler that works? The only source provided in the site
listed in the Documentation does not.
It's not the only source there..
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
[snip]
None of the named compilers gripe? Where, prey tell, do I get the source-
code of a compiler that works? The only source provided in the site
listed in the
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
Richard is asking for source code. Documentation/Changes only gives the
location of binaries.
This is a bit of a problem IMO (I also tried, and failed, to find the egcs
1.1.2 source code). Now that I know where it is, I'll soon post a patch
for
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
Hi Richard,
> There is an error at line 80 in linux-2.4.0/include/asm/posix_types.h
> which prevents source-code from being compiled using the new C compiler
> that I was forced to install in order to build the new kernel.
Hmm.. line 80 is the last
There is an error at line 80 in linux-2.4.0/include/asm/posix_types.h
which prevents source-code from being compiled using the new C compiler
that I was forced to install in order to build the new kernel.
gcc 2.95.3
Script started on Sat Jan 6 22:16:30 2001
# cat xxx.c
There is an error at line 80 in linux-2.4.0/include/asm/posix_types.h
which prevents source-code from being compiled using the new C compiler
that I was forced to install in order to build the new kernel.
gcc 2.95.3
Script started on Sat Jan 6 22:16:30 2001
# cat xxx.c
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
Hi Richard,
There is an error at line 80 in linux-2.4.0/include/asm/posix_types.h
which prevents source-code from being compiled using the new C compiler
that I was forced to install in order to build the new kernel.
Hmm.. line 80 is the last
14 matches
Mail list logo
