Re: r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-13 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 23:20 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > [...] > > Err sorry, I mixed up everything ... I'm using *etherwake* to make the > > WOL magic packet, and ethtool to check the interface options. > > Weird. > > Can you capture the traffic from the

Re: r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-13 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 23:20 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] Err sorry, I mixed up everything ... I'm using *etherwake* to make the WOL magic packet, and ethtool to check the interface options. Weird. Can you capture the traffic from the receiving

Re: r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-12 Thread Francois Romieu
Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Err sorry, I mixed up everything ... I'm using *etherwake* to make the > WOL magic packet, and ethtool to check the interface options. Weird. Can you capture the traffic from the receiving (live) r8169 whith both senders and specify the kernel version

Re: r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-12 Thread Francois Romieu
Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] Err sorry, I mixed up everything ... I'm using *etherwake* to make the WOL magic packet, and ethtool to check the interface options. Weird. Can you capture the traffic from the receiving (live) r8169 whith both senders and specify the kernel version of

Re: r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-11 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le mardi 11 septembre 2007 à 23:30 +0200, Francois Romieu a écrit : > Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > [...] > > with the r8169 I can't send a magic packet anymore. I'm using ethtool > > for that, with the previous one (an rtl8139b) it was working very well. > > ethtool -D apparently says it

Re: r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-11 Thread Francois Romieu
Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > with the r8169 I can't send a magic packet anymore. I'm using ethtool > for that, with the previous one (an rtl8139b) it was working very well. > ethtool -D apparently says it could send the packet ok. I see no "-D" option in the sources from the git

r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-11 Thread Xavier Bestel
Hi again, with the r8169 I can't send a magic packet anymore. I'm using ethtool for that, with the previous one (an rtl8139b) it was working very well. ethtool -D apparently says it could send the packet ok. The receiving side hasn't changed (it's an r8169 too), it's setup for wake-on-lan and is

r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-11 Thread Xavier Bestel
Hi again, with the r8169 I can't send a magic packet anymore. I'm using ethtool for that, with the previous one (an rtl8139b) it was working very well. ethtool -D apparently says it could send the packet ok. The receiving side hasn't changed (it's an r8169 too), it's setup for wake-on-lan and is

Re: r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-11 Thread Francois Romieu
Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] with the r8169 I can't send a magic packet anymore. I'm using ethtool for that, with the previous one (an rtl8139b) it was working very well. ethtool -D apparently says it could send the packet ok. I see no -D option in the sources from the git

Re: r8169: can't send magic packet for Wake-On-Lan

2007-09-11 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le mardi 11 septembre 2007 à 23:30 +0200, Francois Romieu a écrit : Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] with the r8169 I can't send a magic packet anymore. I'm using ethtool for that, with the previous one (an rtl8139b) it was working very well. ethtool -D apparently says it could send