On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:31:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 4:15 AM Ben Dooks wrote:
> >
> > is this a valid warning? if not, should sparse be ignoring these.
>
> It's technically valid, but maybe it's not useful.
>
> If we make sure that any pure bits from a
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 4:15 AM Ben Dooks wrote:
>
> is this a valid warning? if not, should sparse be ignoring these.
It's technically valid, but maybe it's not useful.
If we make sure that any pure bits from a declaration always make it
into the definition, then I suspect that the "was not
I'm seeing the following sparse warnings where the declaration
has __pure but the implementation does not.
lib/bitmap.c:62:6: error: symbol '__bitmap_or_equal' redeclared with different
type (originally declared at ./include/linux/bitmap.h:123) - different modifiers
is this a valid warning?
3 matches
Mail list logo
