On Jul 19 2007 10:41, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> Well, just check if /sys/devices/ exists, that should be cheap enough. :)
>
>Yes, this is a possibility, and one I had considered at first. But I
>wasn't sure which subdirectory to check. sysfs isn't well known for its
>stability, and I didn't know
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:12:52 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Maybe getmntent(3)? Sure I could use this, but how expensive compared
> > to a single stat(2).
>
> How about comparing the device numbers of /sys and its parent? If they
> are
Hi Kay,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:44:54 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On 7/18/07, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > The code looks like:
> > > >
> > > >if
Hi Kay,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:44:54 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On 7/18/07, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
The code looks like:
if
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:12:52 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe getmntent(3)? Sure I could use this, but how expensive compared
to a single stat(2).
How about comparing the device numbers of /sys and its parent? If they
are different
On Jul 19 2007 10:41, Jean Delvare wrote:
Well, just check if /sys/devices/ exists, that should be cheap enough. :)
Yes, this is a possibility, and one I had considered at first. But I
wasn't sure which subdirectory to check. sysfs isn't well known for its
stability, and I didn't know which
On 7/18/07, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > This breaks libsensors. libsensors uses libsysfs, and libsysfs is not
> > very smart in that it will initialize successfully
On 7/18/07, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > This breaks libsensors. libsensors uses libsysfs, and libsysfs is not
> > very smart in that it will initialize
Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>Isn't there some glibc
>> function that can detect the mount point of a filesystem or directory?
>> Something in glibc parses /proc/mounts for something, I
Hi Greg,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > This breaks libsensors. libsensors uses libsysfs, and libsysfs is not
> > very smart in that it will initialize successfully even if sysfs is not
> > mounted.
>
>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:36:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:12:55PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:48:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:36:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:12:55PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:48:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
This breaks libsensors. libsensors uses libsysfs, and libsysfs is not
very smart in that it will initialize successfully even if sysfs is not
mounted.
libsysfs isn't
Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Isn't there some glibc
function that can detect the mount point of a filesystem or directory?
Something in glibc parses /proc/mounts for something, I can't
On 7/18/07, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
This breaks libsensors. libsensors uses libsysfs, and libsysfs is not
very smart in that it will initialize
On 7/18/07, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:28 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
This breaks libsensors. libsensors uses libsysfs, and libsysfs is not
very smart in that it will initialize successfully even if
Hello,
Sorry about late response. -EWASPUBLICHOLIDAY. That's something I've
broken apparently. Will fix soon.
Thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:36:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:12:55PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:48:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:12:55PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:48:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the sysfs
> > > root is broken:
> > >
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:48:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the sysfs
> > root is broken:
> >
> > $ ls -ld /sys
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 15 12:27 /sys
> >
> >
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:48:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the sysfs
root is broken:
$ ls -ld /sys
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 15 12:27 /sys
sysfs is
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:12:55PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:48:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the sysfs
root is broken:
$ ls -ld
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:36:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:12:55PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:48:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the
Hello,
Sorry about late response. -EWASPUBLICHOLIDAY. That's something I've
broken apparently. Will fix soon.
Thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Tejun, hi Greg,
>
> I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the sysfs
> root is broken:
>
> $ ls -ld /sys
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 15 12:27 /sys
>
> sysfs is mounted, the link count should be 11, and is
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Tejun, hi Greg,
I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the sysfs
root is broken:
$ ls -ld /sys
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 15 12:27 /sys
sysfs is mounted, the link count should be 11, and is with
Hi Tejun, hi Greg,
I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the sysfs
root is broken:
$ ls -ld /sys
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 15 12:27 /sys
sysfs is mounted, the link count should be 11, and is with kernel
2.6.22.1. find(1) complains about the bad link count.
I suppose
Hi Tejun, hi Greg,
I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the sysfs
root is broken:
$ ls -ld /sys
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 15 12:27 /sys
sysfs is mounted, the link count should be 11, and is with kernel
2.6.22.1. find(1) complains about the bad link count.
I suppose
28 matches
Mail list logo
