Oops in test11, test11-ac4 and test12-pre4/7 - Repost with correctdecode

2000-12-11 Thread Tim
As Keith Owens pointed out klogd mangled the decode, I haev run it through ksymoops and got the following decode: ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test11. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/ (default)

Oops in test11, test11-ac4 and test12-pre4/7 - Repost with correctdecode

2000-12-11 Thread Tim
As Keith Owens pointed out klogd mangled the decode, I haev run it through ksymoops and got the following decode: ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test11. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/ (default)

Re: Oops in test11, test11-ac4 and test12-pre4/7

2000-12-10 Thread Keith Owens
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:44:06 + (GMT), Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Dec 10 17:08:24 oxygen kernel: Call Trace: [] >[call_spurious_interrupt+33951/35940] [sprintf+20/28] >[call_spurious_interrupt+33924/35940] [do_resource_list+77/132] >[call_spurious_interrupt+33907/35940] [] Yet

Oops in test11, test11-ac4 and test12-pre4/7

2000-12-10 Thread Tim
Runing "modprobe megaraid" triggers this: Dec 10 17:08:08 oxygen kernel: megaraid: v107 (December 22, 1999) Dec 10 17:08:08 oxygen kernel: megaraid: found 0x101e:0x9010: in 00:0c.0 Dec 10 17:08:08 oxygen kernel: scsi0 : Found a MegaRAID controller at 0xe010, IRQ: 16 Dec 10 17:08:08 oxygen

Oops in test11, test11-ac4 and test12-pre4/7

2000-12-10 Thread Tim
Runing "modprobe megaraid" triggers this: Dec 10 17:08:08 oxygen kernel: megaraid: v107 (December 22, 1999) Dec 10 17:08:08 oxygen kernel: megaraid: found 0x101e:0x9010: in 00:0c.0 Dec 10 17:08:08 oxygen kernel: scsi0 : Found a MegaRAID controller at 0xe010, IRQ: 16 Dec 10 17:08:08 oxygen

Re: Oops in test11, test11-ac4 and test12-pre4/7

2000-12-10 Thread Keith Owens
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:44:06 + (GMT), Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dec 10 17:08:24 oxygen kernel: Call Trace: [d08925b7] [call_spurious_interrupt+33951/35940] [sprintf+20/28] [call_spurious_interrupt+33924/35940] [do_resource_list+77/132] [call_spurious_interrupt+33907/35940] [d08925b7]

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-07 Thread Steven Cole
On Thursday 07 December 2000 06:28, Alan Cox wrote: > > I copied the cs46xx.c driver from 2.4.0-test11 to 2.4.0-test11-ac1, > > rebuilt, and I got a test11-ac1 kernel which works with KDE 2.0 and > > sound. > > Excellent, that really narrows it down. Once 2.2.18 is out I will try and > get to the

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-07 Thread Alan Cox
> I copied the cs46xx.c driver from 2.4.0-test11 to 2.4.0-test11-ac1, > rebuilt, and I got a test11-ac1 kernel which works with KDE 2.0 and sound. Excellent, that really narrows it down. Once 2.2.18 is out I will try and get to the bottom of this - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-07 Thread Alan Cox
I copied the cs46xx.c driver from 2.4.0-test11 to 2.4.0-test11-ac1, rebuilt, and I got a test11-ac1 kernel which works with KDE 2.0 and sound. Excellent, that really narrows it down. Once 2.2.18 is out I will try and get to the bottom of this - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-07 Thread Steven Cole
On Thursday 07 December 2000 06:28, Alan Cox wrote: I copied the cs46xx.c driver from 2.4.0-test11 to 2.4.0-test11-ac1, rebuilt, and I got a test11-ac1 kernel which works with KDE 2.0 and sound. Excellent, that really narrows it down. Once 2.2.18 is out I will try and get to the bottom

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-06 Thread Nils Faerber
On Wed, 06 Dec 2000, Steven Cole wrote: > On Tuesday 05 December 2000 18:00, Alan Cox wrote: > > > I did confirm that 2.4.0-test11(final) works properly with sound and KDE > > > 2.0. > > Ok. That sounds even more like its PCI changes > I copied the cs46xx.c driver from 2.4.0-test11 to

Re: test12-pre4: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7.

2000-12-06 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: > On my box, with heavy load I saw: > spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. > Newer seen this message before. > > Linux (2.4.0.11.4) or my old slow box ? > > > giacomo > This is really "normal" occasionally, and probably should not be logged.

test12-pre4: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7.

2000-12-06 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On my box, with heavy load I saw: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. Newer seen this message before. Linux (2.4.0.11.4) or my old slow box ? giacomo My dmesg BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 @ (usable) BIOS-e820: 0400 @

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-06 Thread Steven Cole
On Tuesday 05 December 2000 18:00, Alan Cox wrote: > > I did confirm that 2.4.0-test11(final) works properly with sound and KDE > > 2.0. > > Ok. That sounds even more like its PCI changes > Some new information: I copied the cs46xx.c driver from 2.4.0-test11 to 2.4.0-test11-ac1, rebuilt, and I

Re: SCSI Oops (was test12-pre4)

2000-12-06 Thread Torben Mathiasen
On Mon, Dec 04 2000, Borislav Deianov wrote: > (cross-posted to linux-kernel and linux-scsi) > > Hi, > > The SCSI oops I reported last week is still present in test12-pre4. > This is on a Dell PowerEdge 6300. It has two Adaptec AIC-7890, one > Adaptec AIC-7860, and an AM

Re: SCSI Oops (was test12-pre4)

2000-12-06 Thread Torben Mathiasen
On Mon, Dec 04 2000, Borislav Deianov wrote: (cross-posted to linux-kernel and linux-scsi) Hi, The SCSI oops I reported last week is still present in test12-pre4. This is on a Dell PowerEdge 6300. It has two Adaptec AIC-7890, one Adaptec AIC-7860, and an AMI MegaRAID controller. There's

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-06 Thread Steven Cole
On Tuesday 05 December 2000 18:00, Alan Cox wrote: I did confirm that 2.4.0-test11(final) works properly with sound and KDE 2.0. Ok. That sounds even more like its PCI changes Some new information: I copied the cs46xx.c driver from 2.4.0-test11 to 2.4.0-test11-ac1, rebuilt, and I got a

test12-pre4: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7.

2000-12-06 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
On my box, with heavy load I saw: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. Newer seen this message before. Linux (2.4.0.11.4) or my old slow box ? giacomo My dmesg BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 @ (usable) BIOS-e820: 0400 @

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-06 Thread Nils Faerber
On Wed, 06 Dec 2000, Steven Cole wrote: On Tuesday 05 December 2000 18:00, Alan Cox wrote: I did confirm that 2.4.0-test11(final) works properly with sound and KDE 2.0. Ok. That sounds even more like its PCI changes I copied the cs46xx.c driver from 2.4.0-test11 to 2.4.0-test11-ac1,

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-05 Thread Alan Cox
> I did confirm that 2.4.0-test11(final) works properly with sound and KDE 2.0. Ok. That sounds even more like its PCI changes > I do think its rather odd that these test12-pre3,4,5 kernels all work with > GNOME and the CD player works then. KDE 2.0 is doing something different > at the

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-05 Thread Steven Cole
On Tuesday 05 December 2000 15:02, Alan Cox wrote: > > > cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 > > cs461x: Unknown card (:) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 > > This gets garbage back when it reads the vendor subids. I dont at this > point see it being a sound

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-05 Thread Alan Cox
> Crystal 4280/461x + AC97 Audio, version 0.13, 08:56:46 Dec 5 2000 > cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 > cs461x: Unknown card (1028:0096) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 > ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, vendor id1: 0x4352, id2: 0x5914 (Unknown) This correctly sees the

Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Alexander Viro wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > Synching up with Alan and various other stuff. The most important one > > being the fix to the inode dirty block list. > > It doesn't solve the problem. If you unlink a file with dirty metadata > you have a nice

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-05 Thread Steven Cole
t;); > + return -EIO; > + } > if ((card = kmalloc(sizeof(struct cs_card), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) { > printk(KERN_ERR "cs461x: out of memory\n"); > return -ENOMEM; OK, I patched in the above for both 2.4.0-test12-pre4 an

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-05 Thread Steven Cole
)) == NULL) { printk(KERN_ERR "cs461x: out of memory\n"); return -ENOMEM; OK, I patched in the above for both 2.4.0-test12-pre4 and pre5, but did not get any "unable to enable" printk messages appearing in /var/log/messages. The behavior of course is the same, that i

Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Alexander Viro wrote: On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Synching up with Alan and various other stuff. The most important one being the fix to the inode dirty block list. It doesn't solve the problem. If you unlink a file with dirty metadata you have a nice chance to hit

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-05 Thread Alan Cox
Crystal 4280/461x + AC97 Audio, version 0.13, 08:56:46 Dec 5 2000 cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 cs461x: Unknown card (1028:0096) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, vendor id1: 0x4352, id2: 0x5914 (Unknown) This correctly sees the card

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-05 Thread Steven Cole
On Tuesday 05 December 2000 15:02, Alan Cox wrote: cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 cs461x: Unknown card (:) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 This gets garbage back when it reads the vendor subids. I dont at this point see it being a sound bug but a

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-05 Thread Alan Cox
I did confirm that 2.4.0-test11(final) works properly with sound and KDE 2.0. Ok. That sounds even more like its PCI changes I do think its rather odd that these test12-pre3,4,5 kernels all work with GNOME and the CD player works then. KDE 2.0 is doing something different at the "Loading

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-04 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Alan has it and Linus hasn't applied Alan's patch yet... Linus said. "[ Alan - I ahve your patches in my incoming queue still, I wanted to get an interim version out to check with Al on the block list and the VM stuff with Rik and people. ]" "Garst R. Reese" wrote: > > Did you send

Kernel 2.4-test12-pre4 BUG - scsi (?)

2000-12-04 Thread David Hammerton
[1.] One line summary of the problem: During burning of CD onto SCSI driver (using cdrecord) crashes. during the burn (10% or so) it crashes with "Unable to handle kernel null pointer" [2.] Full description of the problem/report: During burning of CD onto SCSI driver (using

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-04 Thread Garst R. Reese
Did you send it Linus? It is not in pre5 Garst "Mohammad A. Haque" wrote: > Ok, so here's the proper patch for those who dont want to wait for t5 =) > Ignore previous. > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > the fix is in module.h which needs extra parens in the def of > >

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:39:29 -0500, Wakko Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Keith Owens wrote >> Is there any chance of changing arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c to print >> registers, trace and _raw_ code, in that order so it is more like other >> architectures? You can print the decoded instructions

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Steven Cole
Alan Cox wrote: >> > Crystal 4280/461x + AC97 Audio, version 0.14, 13:39:25 Dec 4 2000 >> > cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 >> > cs461x: Unknown card (:) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 >> > ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x4352:0x5914 (Unknown) >> >>

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Wakko Warner
ko/ksymoops-2.3.4] ./ksymoops -v /usr/src/2.4.0-test12-pre4/vmlinux -K -L -O -m /usr/src/2.4.0-test12-pre4/System.map < /rod/home/wakko/240t12p4-boot ksymoops 2.3.4 on alpha 2.2.17-LVM-RAID. Options used -v /usr/src/2.4.0-test12-pre4/vmlinux (specified) -K (specified) -L (specifie

SCSI Oops (was test12-pre4)

2000-12-04 Thread Borislav Deianov
(cross-posted to linux-kernel and linux-scsi) Hi, The SCSI oops I reported last week is still present in test12-pre4. This is on a Dell PowerEdge 6300. It has two Adaptec AIC-7890, one Adaptec AIC-7860, and an AMI MegaRAID controller. There's nothing on the 7890s, a CDROM and a tape drive

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Alan Cox
> > Crystal 4280/461x + AC97 Audio, version 0.14, 13:39:25 Dec 4 2000 > > cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 > > cs461x: Unknown card (:) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 > > ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x4352:0x5914 (Unknown) > > This is failing to

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Alan Cox
> Crystal 4280/461x + AC97 Audio, version 0.14, 13:39:25 Dec 4 2000 > cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 > cs461x: Unknown card (:) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 > ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x4352:0x5914 (Unknown) This is failing to detect the

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Roger Larsson
6xx driver compiled either as a module or into > the kernel, then 2.4.0-test12-pre4 locks up when KDE 2.0 > is started. > > The problem with dummy.o in 2.4.0-test12-pre4 allowed me > to find the possible source of this lock-up which I have been > seeing recently (since test11-ac2) whil

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:27:10 -0700, Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If I have the cs46xx driver compiled either as a module or into >the kernel, then 2.4.0-test12-pre4 locks up when KDE 2.0 >is started. >[snip] >When I say the system freezes, I mean it completely loc

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:26:42 -0500, Wakko Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >PCI patches that were added between pre3 and pre4 allow me to boot the >kernel on my noritake alpha. Once it boots, however, it oops's in the >swapper. I've tried a few times in the past to use ksymoops on oops's on

2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Steven Cole
If I have the cs46xx driver compiled either as a module or into the kernel, then 2.4.0-test12-pre4 locks up when KDE 2.0 is started. The problem with dummy.o in 2.4.0-test12-pre4 allowed me to find the possible source of this lock-up which I have been seeing recently (since test11-ac2) while

2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Wakko Warner
part of the debian potato dist) I have attached the boot log. Keep my name in the CC -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals Linux version 2.4.0-test12-pre4 (wakko@kakarot) (gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux)) #2 Mon Dec 4 09:07:20 EST 2000 Booting

Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > Agreed. However, is there any reason to have this as a separate > function? bforget() should _always_ remove the buffer from any inode > queue. You can make that operation conditional on (bh->b_inode != > NULL) if you want to avoid taking the

Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:01:36AM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > > It doesn't solve the problem. If you unlink a file with dirty metadata > you have a nice chance to hit the BUG() in inode.c:83. I hope that patch > below closes all remaining holes. See analysis in previous posting > (basically,

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-04 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Ok, so here's the proper patch for those who dont want to wait for t5 =) Ignore previous. On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: > the fix is in module.h which needs extra parens in the def of > set_module_owner... > > Jeff --

Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Andrew Morton
, tsk->comm); show_stack(tsk->thread.esp); printk("\n\n"); } read_unlock(_lock); BUG(); } kmem_cache_free(inode_cachep, (inode)); } So we get a full task dump. Otherwise this is vani

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Nikhil Goel
I had the same error, The .config file is attached. Alan Cox wrote: >> Was borking on dummy.c. This seemed to fix it. Verification please? >> >> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test11/include -Wall >> -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe >>

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Alan Cox
> > dummy.c: In function `dummy_init_module': > > dummy.c:103: invalid type argument of `->' > > make[2]: *** [dummy.o] Error 1 > > No, module.h needs fixing. I guess I didn't send that one to Alan... You did send it, you just didnt tell me the dummy patch depended on it and that I needed to

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Alan Cox
> Was borking on dummy.c. This seemed to fix it. Verification please? > > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test11/include -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include >

Re: test12-pre4: BUG at swap.c:271!

2000-12-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Hi, > > When stressing swap (virgin test12-pre4), I encounter the repeatable > oops below once load builds to heavy. The vmscan.c:UnlockPage(page) > addition sets it off. Appears 100% repeatable. > Same here. - To unsubscribe from thi

[patch-2.4.0-test12-pre4] microcode update for Pentium 4.

2000-12-04 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Hi Linus, This patch adds support for the latest member of Intel IA32 family -- the Pentium 4 processor. Tested under 2.4.0-test12-pre4 -- still works. Regards, Tigran diff -urN -X dontdiff linux/CREDITS ucode/CREDITS --- linux/CREDITS Mon Dec 4 08:43:33 2000 +++ ucode/CREDITS Mon

test12-pre4: BUG at swap.c:271!

2000-12-04 Thread Mike Galbraith
Hi, When stressing swap (virgin test12-pre4), I encounter the repeatable oops below once load builds to heavy. The vmscan.c:UnlockPage(page) addition sets it off. Appears 100% repeatable. kernel BUG at swap.c:271! invalid operand: CPU:0 EIP:0010:[] EFLAGS: 00010282 eax

test12-pre4: BUG at swap.c:271!

2000-12-04 Thread Mike Galbraith
Hi, When stressing swap (virgin test12-pre4), I encounter the repeatable oops below once load builds to heavy. The vmscan.c:UnlockPage(page) addition sets it off. Appears 100% repeatable. kernel BUG at swap.c:271! invalid operand: CPU:0 EIP:0010:[c012c144] EFLAGS: 00010282 eax

[patch-2.4.0-test12-pre4] microcode update for Pentium 4.

2000-12-04 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Hi Linus, This patch adds support for the latest member of Intel IA32 family -- the Pentium 4 processor. Tested under 2.4.0-test12-pre4 -- still works. Regards, Tigran diff -urN -X dontdiff linux/CREDITS ucode/CREDITS --- linux/CREDITS Mon Dec 4 08:43:33 2000 +++ ucode/CREDITS Mon

Re: test12-pre4: BUG at swap.c:271!

2000-12-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Mike Galbraith wrote: Hi, When stressing swap (virgin test12-pre4), I encounter the repeatable oops below once load builds to heavy. The vmscan.c:UnlockPage(page) addition sets it off. Appears 100% repeatable. Same here. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Alan Cox
Was borking on dummy.c. This seemed to fix it. Verification please? gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test11/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Alan Cox
dummy.c: In function `dummy_init_module': dummy.c:103: invalid type argument of `-' make[2]: *** [dummy.o] Error 1 No, module.h needs fixing. I guess I didn't send that one to Alan... You did send it, you just didnt tell me the dummy patch depended on it and that I needed to send both

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Nikhil Goel
I had the same error, The .config file is attached. Alan Cox wrote: Was borking on dummy.c. This seemed to fix it. Verification please? gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test11/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe

Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Andrew Morton
p); printk("\n\n"); } read_unlock(tasklist_lock); BUG(); } kmem_cache_free(inode_cachep, (inode)); } So we get a full task dump. Otherwise this is vanilla test12-pre4 plus your bforget_inode() patch. SMP kernel on

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-04 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Ok, so here's the proper patch for those who dont want to wait for t5 =) Ignore previous. On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: the fix is in module.h which needs extra parens in the def of set_module_owner... Jeff --

Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:01:36AM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: It doesn't solve the problem. If you unlink a file with dirty metadata you have a nice chance to hit the BUG() in inode.c:83. I hope that patch below closes all remaining holes. See analysis in previous posting (basically,

Re: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-04 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: Agreed. However, is there any reason to have this as a separate function? bforget() should _always_ remove the buffer from any inode queue. You can make that operation conditional on (bh-b_inode != NULL) if you want to avoid taking the lru

2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Wakko Warner
part of the debian potato dist) I have attached the boot log. Keep my name in the CC -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals Linux version 2.4.0-test12-pre4 (wakko@kakarot) (gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux)) #2 Mon Dec 4 09:07:20 EST 2000 Booting

2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Steven Cole
If I have the cs46xx driver compiled either as a module or into the kernel, then 2.4.0-test12-pre4 locks up when KDE 2.0 is started. The problem with dummy.o in 2.4.0-test12-pre4 allowed me to find the possible source of this lock-up which I have been seeing recently (since test11-ac2) while

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:26:42 -0500, Wakko Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PCI patches that were added between pre3 and pre4 allow me to boot the kernel on my noritake alpha. Once it boots, however, it oops's in the swapper. I've tried a few times in the past to use ksymoops on oops's on the

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:27:10 -0700, Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I have the cs46xx driver compiled either as a module or into the kernel, then 2.4.0-test12-pre4 locks up when KDE 2.0 is started. [snip] When I say the system freezes, I mean it completely locks up, and ALT-SYSRQ

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Roger Larsson
compiled either as a module or into the kernel, then 2.4.0-test12-pre4 locks up when KDE 2.0 is started. The problem with dummy.o in 2.4.0-test12-pre4 allowed me to find the possible source of this lock-up which I have been seeing recently (since test11-ac2) while starting up KDE 2.0

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Alan Cox
Crystal 4280/461x + AC97 Audio, version 0.14, 13:39:25 Dec 4 2000 cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 cs461x: Unknown card (:) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x4352:0x5914 (Unknown) This is failing to detect the CS46xx.

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Alan Cox
Crystal 4280/461x + AC97 Audio, version 0.14, 13:39:25 Dec 4 2000 cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 cs461x: Unknown card (:) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x4352:0x5914 (Unknown) This is failing to detect the

SCSI Oops (was test12-pre4)

2000-12-04 Thread Borislav Deianov
(cross-posted to linux-kernel and linux-scsi) Hi, The SCSI oops I reported last week is still present in test12-pre4. This is on a Dell PowerEdge 6300. It has two Adaptec AIC-7890, one Adaptec AIC-7860, and an AMI MegaRAID controller. There's nothing on the 7890s, a CDROM and a tape drive

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Wakko Warner
bytes are also available. In the meantime, this patch to ksymoops 2.3.5 will pick up the change to the trace lines. It will still complain about a bad code line, ksymoops is built for raw data. Didn't help much: [wakko@kakarot:/home/wakko/ksymoops-2.3.4] ./ksymoops -v /usr/src/2.4.0-test12-pre4

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 + cs46xx + KDE 2.0 = frozen system

2000-12-04 Thread Steven Cole
Alan Cox wrote: Crystal 4280/461x + AC97 Audio, version 0.14, 13:39:25 Dec 4 2000 cs461x: Card found at 0xf8ffe000 and 0xf8e0, IRQ 18 cs461x: Unknown card (:) at 0xf8ffe000/0xf8e0, IRQ 18 ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x4352:0x5914 (Unknown) This is failing

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:39:29 -0500, Wakko Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Keith Owens wrote Is there any chance of changing arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c to print registers, trace and _raw_ code, in that order so it is more like other architectures? You can print the decoded instructions as well

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-04 Thread Garst R. Reese
Did you send it Linus? It is not in pre5 Garst "Mohammad A. Haque" wrote: Ok, so here's the proper patch for those who dont want to wait for t5 =) Ignore previous. On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: the fix is in module.h which needs extra parens in the def of

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-04 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Alan has it and Linus hasn't applied Alan's patch yet... Linus said. "[ Alan - I ahve your patches in my incoming queue still, I wanted to get an interim version out to check with Al on the block list and the VM stuff with Rik and people. ]" "Garst R. Reese" wrote: Did you send it

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
the fix is in module.h which needs extra parens in the def of set_module_owner... Jeff On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > Patch posted here... > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=97590235825341=2 > > "Garst R. Reese" wrote: > > > > Fails to compile module at

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > Was borking on dummy.c. This seemed to fix it. Verification please? > > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test11/include -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-03 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Patch posted here... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=97590235825341=2 "Garst R. Reese" wrote: > > Fails to compile module at line 103, > invalid type argument of -> > Sorry if this well known. > Garst > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-03 Thread Garst R. Reese
Fails to compile module at line 103, invalid type argument of -> Sorry if this well known. Garst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Synching up with Alan and various other stuff. The most important one > being the fix to the inode dirty block list. It doesn't solve the problem. If you unlink a file with dirty metadata you have a nice chance to hit the BUG() in inode.c:83. I

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Tom Holroyd
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -mcpu=ev6 -Wa,-mev6-DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c pci.c pci.c: In function `pci_read_bases': pci.c:576: `tmp' undeclared (first use in this function) pci.c:576:

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Was borking on dummy.c. This seemed to fix it. Verification please? gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test11/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include

test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Linus Torvalds
Synching up with Alan and various other stuff. The most important one being the fix to the inode dirty block list. Linus - pre4: - Andries Brouwer: final isofs pieces. - Kai Germaschewski: ISDN - play CD audio correctly, don't stop after 12 minutes. -

test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Linus Torvalds
Synching up with Alan and various other stuff. The most important one being the fix to the inode dirty block list. Linus - pre4: - Andries Brouwer: final isofs pieces. - Kai Germaschewski: ISDN - play CD audio correctly, don't stop after 12 minutes. -

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Was borking on dummy.c. This seemed to fix it. Verification please? gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test11/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Tom Holroyd
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -mcpu=ev6 -Wa,-mev6-DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c pci.c pci.c: In function `pci_read_bases': pci.c:576: `tmp' undeclared (first use in this function) pci.c:576:

[PATCH] inode dirty blocks Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Synching up with Alan and various other stuff. The most important one being the fix to the inode dirty block list. It doesn't solve the problem. If you unlink a file with dirty metadata you have a nice chance to hit the BUG() in inode.c:83. I hope

test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-03 Thread Garst R. Reese
Fails to compile module at line 103, invalid type argument of - Sorry if this well known. Garst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-03 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Patch posted here... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=97590235825341w=2 "Garst R. Reese" wrote: Fails to compile module at line 103, invalid type argument of - Sorry if this well known. Garst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: test12-pre4

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: Was borking on dummy.c. This seemed to fix it. Verification please? gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test11/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686

Re: test12-pre4 drivers/net/dummy

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
the fix is in module.h which needs extra parens in the def of set_module_owner... Jeff On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: Patch posted here... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=97590235825341w=2 "Garst R. Reese" wrote: Fails to compile module at line