RE: tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-04-09 Thread Manuel A. McLure
Jeff Garzik said: [snip conversation about NETDEV WATCHDOG errors on ADMTek Comet tulip clone card] > > Ok, this should be fixed in the latest patches sent to Alan and Linus. Testing with 2.4.3-ac3 and so far, so good. Thanks! -- Manuel A. McLure - Unify Corp. Technical Support <[EMAIL

RE: tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-04-09 Thread Manuel A. McLure
Jeff Garzik said: [snip conversation about NETDEV WATCHDOG errors on ADMTek Comet tulip clone card] Ok, this should be fixed in the latest patches sent to Alan and Linus. Testing with 2.4.3-ac3 and so far, so good. Thanks! -- Manuel A. McLure - Unify Corp. Technical Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-04-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
"Manuel A. McLure" wrote: > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > > It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from > > > 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV > > WATCHDOG errors shortly > > > after rebooting with 2.4.3,

Re: tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-04-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
"Manuel A. McLure" wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV WATCHDOG errors shortly after rebooting with 2.4.3, although these were

RE: tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-03-30 Thread Manuel A. McLure
Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > > It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from > > 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV > WATCHDOG errors shortly > > after rebooting with 2.4.3, although these were of the > "slow/packet

tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-03-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: > It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from > 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV WATCHDOG errors shortly > after rebooting with 2.4.3, although these were of the "slow/packet lossy" > type I got with

tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-03-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV WATCHDOG errors shortly after rebooting with 2.4.3, although these were of the "slow/packet lossy" type I got with 2.4.2-ac20

RE: tulip (was RE: Kernel 2.4.3 fails to compile)

2001-03-30 Thread Manuel A. McLure
Jeff Garzik wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Manuel A. McLure wrote: It looks like the tulip driver isn't as up-to-date as the one from 2.4.2-ac20 - when is 2.4.3-ac1 due? :-) I got NETDEV WATCHDOG errors shortly after rebooting with 2.4.3, although these were of the "slow/packet lossy"