On 10/08/14 16:18, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Peter Foley wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> That we can't solve, but it is not okay to break the kernel build.
>>
>> Should I just make CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC depend on CROSS_COMPILE=""?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Peter Foley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> That we can't solve, but it is not okay to break the kernel build.
>
> Should I just make CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC depend on CROSS_COMPILE=""?
> I'm not sure how much value would be added by
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> That we can't solve, but it is not okay to break the kernel build.
Should I just make CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC depend on CROSS_COMPILE=""?
I'm not sure how much value would be added by implementing targetprogs
in kbuild, simply to increase build
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:21:00 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> On 10/08/2014 02:09 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >>
> >> Breaking cross-compilation is not okay, though, regardless of what
> >> Fedora does. It should be okay to, for example, build an i386 kernel on
> >> an ARM box.
> >>
> >
> > I
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:55:00 -0700
> "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>
>> On 10/08/2014 01:46 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> >
>> > Fedora doesn't cross-compile i686 builds because of problems like
>> > this. It sets up an i386 chroot and runs all native
On 10/08/2014 02:09 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>>
>> Breaking cross-compilation is not okay, though, regardless of what
>> Fedora does. It should be okay to, for example, build an i386 kernel on
>> an ARM box.
>>
>
> I think they tried that for a while, and ended up chasing compiler
> and makefile
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:55:00 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> On 10/08/2014 01:46 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >
> > Fedora doesn't cross-compile i686 builds because of problems like
> > this. It sets up an i386 chroot and runs all native tools inside of
> > it.
> >
>
> Breaking cross-compilation
On 10/08/2014 01:46 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
> Fedora doesn't cross-compile i686 builds because of problems like
> this. It sets up an i386 chroot and runs all native tools inside of
> it.
>
Breaking cross-compilation is not okay, though, regardless of what
Fedora does. It should be okay to,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:16:11 -0700
> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Josh Boyer
>> wrote:
>> > I'm seeing the following build failure on a 32-bit x86 build in Fedora
>> > based on Linux v3.17-2860-gef0625b70dac:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:16:11 -0700
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > I'm seeing the following build failure on a 32-bit x86 build in Fedora
> > based on Linux v3.17-2860-gef0625b70dac:
> >
> > Documentation/vDSO/vdso_standalone_test_x86.o: In
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> It should build and work on 32-bit.
>
> Except that the makefile is totally bogus. vdso_standalone_test isn't
> a hostprog at all. It's a target prog. But kbuild doesn't understand
> that, so I have no idea what, if anything, that
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I'm seeing the following build failure on a 32-bit x86 build in Fedora
> based on Linux v3.17-2860-gef0625b70dac:
>
> Documentation/vDSO/vdso_standalone_test_x86.o: In function `to_base10':
> vdso_standalone_test_x86.c:(.text+0xcc): undefined
I'm seeing the following build failure on a 32-bit x86 build in Fedora
based on Linux v3.17-2860-gef0625b70dac:
Documentation/vDSO/vdso_standalone_test_x86.o: In function `to_base10':
vdso_standalone_test_x86.c:(.text+0xcc): undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
I'm seeing the following build failure on a 32-bit x86 build in Fedora
based on Linux v3.17-2860-gef0625b70dac:
Documentation/vDSO/vdso_standalone_test_x86.o: In function `to_base10':
vdso_standalone_test_x86.c:(.text+0xcc): undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm seeing the following build failure on a 32-bit x86 build in Fedora
based on Linux v3.17-2860-gef0625b70dac:
Documentation/vDSO/vdso_standalone_test_x86.o: In function `to_base10':
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
It should build and work on 32-bit.
Except that the makefile is totally bogus. vdso_standalone_test isn't
a hostprog at all. It's a target prog. But kbuild doesn't understand
that, so I have no idea what, if
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:16:11 -0700
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm seeing the following build failure on a 32-bit x86 build in Fedora
based on Linux v3.17-2860-gef0625b70dac:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Chuck Ebbert cebbert.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:16:11 -0700
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
I'm seeing the following build failure on a 32-bit x86 build
On 10/08/2014 01:46 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Fedora doesn't cross-compile i686 builds because of problems like
this. It sets up an i386 chroot and runs all native tools inside of
it.
Breaking cross-compilation is not okay, though, regardless of what
Fedora does. It should be okay to, for
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:55:00 -0700
H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 10/08/2014 01:46 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Fedora doesn't cross-compile i686 builds because of problems like
this. It sets up an i386 chroot and runs all native tools inside of
it.
Breaking cross-compilation
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chuck Ebbert cebbert.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:55:00 -0700
H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 10/08/2014 01:46 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Fedora doesn't cross-compile i686 builds because of problems like
this. It sets up an i386 chroot
On 10/08/2014 02:09 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Breaking cross-compilation is not okay, though, regardless of what
Fedora does. It should be okay to, for example, build an i386 kernel on
an ARM box.
I think they tried that for a while, and ended up chasing compiler
and makefile bugs all day.
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:21:00 -0700
H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
On 10/08/2014 02:09 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Breaking cross-compilation is not okay, though, regardless of what
Fedora does. It should be okay to, for example, build an i386 kernel on
an ARM box.
I think they
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
That we can't solve, but it is not okay to break the kernel build.
Should I just make CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC depend on CROSS_COMPILE=?
I'm not sure how much value would be added by implementing targetprogs
in kbuild, simply to
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Peter Foley pefol...@pefoley.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
That we can't solve, but it is not okay to break the kernel build.
Should I just make CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC depend on CROSS_COMPILE=?
I'm not sure how
On 10/08/14 16:18, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Peter Foley pefol...@pefoley.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
That we can't solve, but it is not okay to break the kernel build.
Should I just make CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC
26 matches
Mail list logo
