Re: xfs mount opts (was: More better in mount(2))

hi, On Jan 5, 3:51pm, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Subject: Re: More better in mount(2) > Nathan Scott wrote: > > On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > ... > > > This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses > > > strtok which is horribly horribly broken. (Do

Re: xfs mount opts (was: More better in mount(2))

hi, On Jan 5, 3:51pm, Daniel Phillips wrote: Subject: Re: More better in mount(2) Nathan Scott wrote: On Jan 5, 3:26am, Daniel Phillips wrote: ... This filesystem mount option parsing code is completely ad hoc, and uses strtok which is horribly horribly broken. (Do man strtok and