Re: thread group comments

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
I don't see how you can do this. Also on user level you would have to do this atomically since otherwise communication between the threads isn't possible anymore. We have a PR in the glibc bug data base about just that. And I know that there are many other users with this problem. You

Re: thread group comments

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
The queued exit signal could carry which thread has died. The only tricky issue is what to do when the exit signal cannot be queued because there are too many threads in flight, in this case it makes sense to just make it pending without any data (the thread library can search some global

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
This is all just curiosity. I've considered trying some thread programming, but if it is as stupid as it sounds, I'd rather learn the "right" way of writing code that would ordinarily be done with threads, etc.. Right now, I'm using fork() all over the place and don't much care how much

Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
What is the deal here? I have NEVER seen anyboody flatly refuse email from me. Are you telling me I have to go into work and use my [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address to talk to Alan? That's asinine. When you get as much spam aimed at you as I do because the address is so well known you'd

Re: IrDA as a module

2000-09-02 Thread Russell King
"Micha³ 'CeFeK' Nazarewicz" writes: salve, This may be called the next part of my previous e-mail. IrDA as a module doesn't work... I am getting strange information, while all the otthers modules work (altough I must specify the full path to them, I guess it's a matter of modprobe

Re: [Announcement] pre-patch-2.0.39-7

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
Two things Im not 100% sure is correct 1. This may be wonderous hand optimised magic but I'd rather let the compiler do it so its readable. Also have you checked what apps will try to set unused flags and assume they will fail quietly ? +/* + * Disallow unknown clone(2) flags, as well as

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread Graham Murray
David Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this. What is the best way to handle sites which block connections using ECN? Is it best for everyone who detects this to write individually to each site which they find can be accessed with "echo 0

No Subject

2000-09-02 Thread Stefan Becker
Hi! Alan Cox wrote: [...] o Add later sb16 imix support tot he sb driver(Massimo Dal Zotto) [...] I have a sb16 ISA card and a hauppauge win-pci and the following patch prevents my hauppauge card from doing sound output. 2.2.17pre20 and 2.2.18pre2 without the patch are working very

Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-02 Thread Matthew Kirkwood
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Fix your routing tables ? and several other people have said similar things in the past. I see the point, but it bites sufficiently often that I don't understand why there is no interesting in improving this behaviour. I have several hosts with multiple or

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread Jamie Lokier
dean gaudet wrote: an example of brokenness in the traditional fd API is close-on-exec -- there's a race between open()/socket()/pipe() and fcntl(FD_CLOEXEC) during which if another thread does a fork() it's possible the child will inherit an fd it shouldn't... working around it is painful.

USB problems and 2.4.0 hangs

2000-09-02 Thread John Coppens
Hi all. I'd installed the backport of the USB patch (to 2.2.16) and had the following problem: After a few inches of printing a graphics page (ghostscript output), the whole printing job would just hang. Only exit was switching the printer on/off and removing the print job. The printer is an

Drivers that potentially leave state as TASK_{UN}INTERRUPTIBLE

2000-09-02 Thread John Levon
Am I right ? against test8pre1 Also, is it a bug to not set TASK_{UN}INTERRUPTIBLE before doing a schedule_timeout() ? What will happen ? thanks john --- drivers/pcmcia/yenta.c Fri Aug 11 00:21:32 2000 +++ drivers/pcmcia/yenta.c.new Fri Sep 1 02:42:55 2000 @@ -574,6 +574,7 @@

IrDA and PCMCIA

2000-09-02 Thread Micha 'CeFeK' Nazarewicz
Salve, That's me again :-) It looks like that I am the only person with Dell Latitude CPt using Linux 2.4 or nobody before wrote here -- as I can't find a solution to my problems via the web. The next problems are: 1. When I boot up, kernel finishes booting with equally 50%

Re: IrDA and PCMCIA

2000-09-02 Thread Alex Romosan
"Micha³ 'CeFeK' Nazarewicz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Salve, That's me again :-) It looks like that I am the only person with Dell Latitude CPt using Linux 2.4 or nobody before wrote here -- as I can't find a solution to my problems via the web. The next problems are: 1.

[patch] 3c59x.c

2000-09-02 Thread Andrew Morton
This patch fixes some long-standing problems which people have been experiencing on collisiony half-duplex 10baseT LANs. It also syncs up some device names and types with the latest pcmcia_cs release. Many thanks to David Hinds for sorting all this out. Changelog entry (maintained at

Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/

2000-09-02 Thread Richard Gooch
Jamie Lokier writes: Richard Gooch wrote: I agree. Firstly, you can't frob random memory with the MTRR driver, so it clearly doesn't need CAP_SYS_RAWIO. With it you can change the behaviour of other drivers by changing the properties of their MMIO space. So it should need

Re: [patch] 3c59x.c

2000-09-02 Thread Alex Romosan
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch fixes some long-standing problems which people have been experiencing on collisiony half-duplex 10baseT LANs. It also syncs up some device names and types with the latest pcmcia_cs release. Many thanks to David Hinds for sorting all

Quick memory corruption with cramfs

2000-09-02 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Is anyone using cramfs? I copy cramfs image from nfs onto /dev/ram0, then mount it. It mounts, and first few accesses are okay, but then it breaks. ls shows garbage etc. Kernel 2.4.0-test4-pre3 on mips/r39xx. Pavel -- I'm

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote: dean gaudet wrote: an example of brokenness in the traditional fd API is close-on-exec -- there's a race between open()/socket()/pipe() and fcntl(FD_CLOEXEC) during which if another thread does a fork() it's possible the child will inherit an fd

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread Elmer Joandi
Matti Aarnio wrote: From personal experience I can say that even cisco router training includes example of: "block ALL of ICMP", which of course makes TCP PMTU discovery non-functional. Yeah, there is the general problem with such a stuff: if something becomes de

Drivers that don't set TASK_{UN}INTERRUPTIBLE

2000-09-02 Thread John Levon
Against test8pre1 Every one that doesn't check interrupts has just been made UNINTERRUPTIBLE. This is not clearly right for some of these, but maintainers need to fix these up ... ? sorry for the mass mailing thanks john --- drivers/net/wan/comx-hw-comx.c Mon Jul 10 03:15:29 2000 +++

Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
I see the point, but it bites sufficiently often that I don't understand why there is no interesting in improving this behaviour. For a large number of scenarios it makes vastly more sense. With both interfaces up, it's impossible to apply anti-martian rules to the interfaces, since it's

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-09-02 Thread Philipp Rumpf
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 01:28:08PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 02:23:57PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see the advantage over Alan's proposal of simply adding the config data to the bzImage or whatever is the most common format on the respective platform.

Rocketport driver fix

2000-09-02 Thread John Levon
This is a stupid and probably wrong patch to rocket.c Against test6 but clean on test8pre1 Tytso, this wasn't on sourceforge either Someone on #kernelnewbies needed this for several rocketports thanks john --- drivers/char/rocket.c Mon Jun 19 21:25:06 2000 +++

error in arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c (subtle)

2000-09-02 Thread Silvio Cesare
Hi. This is my first post to this list (not that i'm even subscribed) and am very new to linux internals so apologies up front :) There is a subtle bug in the behaviour of ptrace when modifying the EIP register. Noteably, if the eip changes and a syscall was interrupted, the signal handling

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread David Ford
So make noise. I tried a post at /. but it wasn't accepted. We have power in our [tiny] voices when used enmasse. -d Graham Murray wrote: David Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this. What is the best way to handle sites which

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: Why? I would say that bad thing about SysV shared memory is that it's _not_ sufficiently filesystem-thing - a special API where 'create a file on ramfs and bloody mmap() it' would be sufficient. Why bother with special sets of syscalls? what i mean

Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VMnow?

2000-09-02 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: Not really. I'm not aware of any bug with my VM that doesn't occur in the standard VM too. So what happened with the BUG() thing that you had? I never saw any resolution to that, and that certainly

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread Richard Gooch
Ingo Molnar writes: On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: what i mean is that i dont like the cleanup issues associated with SysV shared memory - eg. it can hang around even if all users have exited, so auto-cleanup of resources is not possible. unlink() and the last

[PATCH] 2.2.16 to Enable Variable Size Block Chaining

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Linus, The following path is submitted to allow variable size sectors runs to be submitted via ll_rw_block() to the disk I/O subsystem. Jeff 881a882,885 /* // this code is being removed to enable passing of variable size block // chained I/O requests. Jeff V. Merkey 888a893,894

[PATCH] 2.4.0-test7 to Enable Variable Block Chaining

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Linus, The attached patch is submitted to enable variable sector size block chaining via ll_rw_block() in the I/O subsystem layer. Jeff 904a905,907 / // This code is being commented out to allow support for variable chained // block I/O requests. Jeff V. Merkey 915a919 */

NWFS [PATCH] File organization 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-7

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Linus, I at present have the NWFS utilities and File System drivers as single source base. Obviously, the way your tree is organized, the file system driver proper should be in the kernel tree and the file system utitilies somewhere else. Where should I breakout the file system utils and

Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?

2000-09-02 Thread Henrik Størner
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: In fact, I plan to spend most of my time trying to track down the 2 VM problems on tytso's list: 1) the innd data corruption bug This, I think, was due to a bug in ext2 truncate. If so,

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Michael Bacarella wrote: Q: Why do we need threads? A: Because on some operating systems, task switches are expensive. No. threads share variable and code memory, processes do not. And sometimes it can make your life a lot easier. Even if you can use things such as SHM

Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VM now?

2000-09-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article 8ornsg$h70$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Henrik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=F8rner?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am one of the people who have been seeing this problem. I would be very surprised if it was an ext2 problem, as the only ext2 filesystem on my disk contains all of /boot. No programs, no news

[ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
TRG has reprioritized it's long term objectives, and due to resource constraints and short term schedules, the Open Source NDS and Open Source NTFS File System projects are being withdrawn from the Linux Initiative. These projects will be MANOS only, and any interested party is free to acquire

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Ingo" == Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ingo On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Dan Maas wrote: There are various other tricks that can be done to speed up network servers, like passing files directly from the buffer cache to the network card. This one is currently frowned upon by the Linux

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux

2000-09-02 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeff TRG has reprioritized it's long term objectives, and due to Jeff resource constraints and short term schedules, the Open Source Jeff NDS and Open Source NTFS File System projects are being Jeff withdrawn from the Linux Initiative. These

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
to MANOS, and what a mess indeed. In NetWare, the only time data ever gets copied from incoming packets is: 1. A copy to userspace at a stream head. 2. An incoming write that gets copied into the file cache. Sounds like Linux - one DMA and one copy to user space. Reads from cache are

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
KDB is putrid. Can it debug double faults? NO. Can it debug complex register and numeric evaluation statements like IF ((EAX == 1) [ESP-4] == 0x3000)? NO. Can it debug nested task gate exceptions? NO. Can it debug SMP locks races? NO. Can it debug priority inversion problems in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux

2000-09-02 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeff KDB is putrid. Can it debug double faults? NO. Can it debug Jeff complex register and numeric evaluation statements like IF ((EAX Jeff == 1) [ESP-4] == 0x3000)? NO. Can it debug nested task gate Jeff exceptions? NO. Can it debug SMP

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan Cox wrote: to MANOS, and what a mess indeed. In NetWare, the only time data ever gets copied from incoming packets is: 1. A copy to userspace at a stream head. 2. An incoming write that gets copied into the file cache. Sounds like Linux - one DMA and one copy to user

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Jes Sorensen wrote: Yeah I bet NT also has a wonderful graphical click click wush wush environment for it that allows you to spend all your time `improving' your rsi instead of getting real work done. Have you ever looked at NT device driver code? I have, it's not pretty at all so I can

[Fwd: zero-copy TCP]

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Jes, I wrote the SMP ODI networking layer in NetWare that used today by over 90,000,000 NetWare users. I also wrote the SMP LLC8022 Stack, the SMP IPX/SPX Stack, and the SMP OSPF TCPIP stack in NetWare. I think I know what the hell I'm doing here. Most Network protocols assume a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux

2000-09-02 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:01:24PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:34:47PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: KDB is putrid. Can it debug double faults? NO. Can it debug complex register and numeric evaluation statements like IF ((EAX ==

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
**ALL** Netware network drivers support a scatter/gather proramming interface, whether the hardware does or not. In NetWare, the drivers get passed a fragment list in what's called an ECB (Event Control Block). It's the drivers responsiblity to assemble the fragment lists. We did it this way

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [since you like to forward things after sending me a private email, I'll do the same]. Jeff I wrote the SMP ODI networking layer in NetWare that used today by Jeff over 90,000,000 NetWare users. I also wrote the SMP LLC8022 Jeff Stack, the SMP

[Fwd: zero-copy TCP]

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Jes Sorensen wrote: "Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeff Jes, Jeff I wrote the SMP ODI networking layer in NetWare that used today by Jeff over 90,000,000 NetWare users. I also wrote the SMP LLC8022 Jeff Stack, the SMP IPX/SPX Stack, and the SMP OSPF TCPIP

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
Sounds like Linux - one DMA and one copy to user space. Alan, Please. I'm in your code and there are copies all over the place. I agree you have a "fast path" for most stuff, but there's all There arent copies all over the case for the paths that occur. Like 99.999% of the time.

Re: [Fwd: zero-copy TCP]

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
file system operation. What I wrote is THREE TIMES FASTER THAN WHAT'S IN LINUX. Care to do a challenge. Let's take my NetWare code and see which is faster and lower latency on a Network. Mine or Linux's. I bet you $100.00 it will beat the Linux code in every test. At what. IPX - sure.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Andi Kleen wrote: On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:01:24PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: Of course not. Linux does not have a kernel debugger, or it would use them. That's what they are used for -- debugging running tasks from a kernel debugger that has it's own task gates. If you have

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeff **ALL** Netware network drivers support a scatter/gather Jeff proramming interface, whether the hardware does or not. In Jeff NetWare, the drivers get passed a fragment list in what's called Jeff an ECB (Event Control Block). It's the

Re: [Fwd: zero-copy TCP]

2000-09-02 Thread Jes Sorensen
"Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeff Jes Sorensen wrote: I'd love to see a netware box sustain 110MB/sec (MB as in mega byte) memory to memory in two TCP streams between dual 400MHz P2 boxes. Jeff What the hell does a NUMA interconnect have to do with Jeff networking.

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan Cox wrote: Sounds like Linux - one DMA and one copy to user space. Alan, Please. I'm in your code and there are copies all over the place. I agree you have a "fast path" for most stuff, but there's all There arent copies all over the case for the paths that occur. Like

2.4.0-test8-pre2 compile fails at smbfs

2000-09-02 Thread Ari Pollak
Building 2.4.0-test8-pre2 fails with smbfs enabled: kgcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -fno-strict-aliasing -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h

Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre2 compile fails at smbfs

2000-09-02 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Same with coda make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/fs/coda' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -fno-strict-aliasing -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Andi Kleen wrote: On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:28:18PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: Alan Cox wrote: We dont copy for checksumming. We fold the single user space copy and the checksum operation into one path, because on any modern CPU it costs precisely the same to copy as to

RE: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread Marty Fouts
I'm confused. Threads are harder than *what* to get right? If you need concurrency, you need concurrency, and any existing model is hard. Besides, at some level, all of the concurrency models come down to a variant on threads, anyway. -Original Message- From: Alexander Viro

RE: thread rant [semi-OT]

2000-09-02 Thread Marty Fouts
just an aside on asynchronous i/o: concurrency by asychronous I/O actually predates concurrency via thread-like models, and goes back to the earliest OS-precursors. Early work on thread-like concurrency models were, in part, a response to the difficulties inherent in getting asynchronous I/O

Re: Rik van Riel's VM patch

2000-09-02 Thread Bill Huey
John, Hi, this is just a short no-statistics testimony that Rik's VM patch to test8-pre1 seems much improved over test7. I have a UP P200 with 40Mb, and previously running KDE2 + mozilla was totally unusable. With the patch, things run much more smoothly. Interactive feel seems better,

ext2 corruption with 2.4.0-test7-proper ?

2000-09-02 Thread Adam
Hmmm I just discovered that my filesystem got fairly corrupted with 2.4.0-test7 proper. It has been up for 5 days nonstop and there was no problems. I have decided to shut it down only to discover that contest of /sbin directory is pretty much a soup. went back to 2.4.0-test7-pre2 and it

Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-09-02 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Alan Cox writes: What is the deal here? I have NEVER seen anyboody flatly refuse email from me. Are you telling me I have to go into work and use my [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address to talk to Alan? That's asinine. When you get as much spam aimed at you as I do because the address is so

Re: What the Heck? [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-09-02 Thread Matthew Dharm
I missed the beginning of this thread, but I can guess what's going on here... According to the ORBS database, rr.com specifically requested all automated testing for open mail relays to stop. As such, ORBS lists all IPs in the rr.com domain as 127.0.0.4, which is their code for "manually

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
There's been a few cards around since about 1995, but I don't remember all of them. I do remember having to debug SMP code on them though -- yec Jeff Jes Sorensen wrote: "Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeff Jes Sorensen wrote: You just told us earlier in

Re: 2.2.18pre2: gcc 2.7 doesn't like __attr__((unused))

2000-09-02 Thread Chip Salzenberg
According to Alan Cox: I'm not sure if __attribute__((unused)) has an equivalent in gcc 2.7, but as it appears in the AGP driver, it doesn't work with gcc 2.7. Try static void __attribute((unused)) unused(void) I'm afraid that didn't work either. -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a.

Re: Rik van Riel's VM patch

2000-09-02 Thread safemode
Just like to thank Rik for this one. The patch is unbelievable and I have trouble with the readings bonnie gives me. (before kernel patch (2.4.0-test8-pre1 with Low latency patch) ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- -Per Char-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-02 Thread Andre Hedrick
Jeff, Have you been in the bottle again? If this is not a joke, it is not funny. On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: TRG has reprioritized it's long term objectives, and due to resource constraints and short term schedules, the Open Source NDS and Open Source NTFS File System

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Andre, One of our best friends we've known for years tried to kill himself when Novell layed him off. I will reconsider later, but not now. Not with what's going on at Novell. If we post it, Microsoft will grab it and it will be in NT within 48 hours of them downloading it from our site.

Re: Linux Chat Servers

2000-09-02 Thread Gerhard Mack
And the problem with irc.openprojects.net is ... ? Gerhard On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Michael Peddemors wrote: Sorta off the topic, but just setup a 'Chat Room' For Linux Specific Topics... If it is useful, we will expand the concept and set it up on a dedicated server etc..

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linux

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: I've got a lot of responses to this. Any companies out there who have job postings and the need for some talented networking engineers in Utah, please send us the info so we can post it on our website. If there's Linux work, these guys can do what we did, and learn

Re: [Fwd: Client Server NEWS FLASH: Novell Plans To Can 60% OverTime]

2000-09-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: I've got a lot of responses to this. Any companies out there who have job postings and the need for some talented networking engineers in Utah, please send us the info so we can post it on our website. If there's Linux work, these guys can do what we did, and learn

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS forLinux

2000-09-02 Thread Andre Hedrick
Apology to Jeff, I am sorry to here of this, but I know what you mean about microsoft. My and co-worker's code for doing full taskfile access under linux was rejected here but is being used in MicroSoft Whistler 2001. They are quick to grab the very best of Linux and adopt it for their own.

Re: Variable Block Chains in ll_rw_block()

2000-09-02 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: Linus, This morning I tried what you suggested last night, and saw some issues with the Adaptec SCSI driver doing an Oops when I tried 1024-512-1024 with the block check removed on 2.2.16. The IDE driver did not barf but when I tried it on a

Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VMnow?

2000-09-02 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: You don't actually have to be smart. There's a really simple way to avoid this: compare the thing you're going to zero out against zero before you memset() it to zero. If it was already zero, you just unlock the page and release. Downside:

Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating Rik's VMnow?

2000-09-02 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: Comments? Basically the "grab_cache_page()" would be a "read_cache_page()" instead with all the wait-on-page etc stuff. Works for me. However, that way it looks like a fs/buffer.c fodder. Mind if I just call it block_zero_page(page, from, to)

Re: Oops/kernel panic with CD jukebox, 2.4.0-test{6,7}

2000-09-02 Thread Steven S. Dick
Anssi V I Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings. I'm having serious problems with my external NEC/Nakamichi MBR-7 7-CD jukebox. Linux gives me an oops _every_time_ I try to access two CDs from that jukebox at the same time and sometimes it even gives me a kernel panic when I'm doing that.

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread Elmer Joandi
Alan Cox wrote: There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this. So mail lots of people. Cisco are I think now aware that their firewall products dont handle ECN correctly but others might not be. Or wait until more vendors roll out ECN There is another big problem like

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:12:04PM +0200, Elmer Joandi wrote: Alan Cox wrote: There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this. So mail lots of people. Cisco are I think now aware that their firewall products dont handle ECN correctly but others might not be. Or wait

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread kernel
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Andi Kleen wrote: There is another big problem like that... tunnels actually do not work on todays real internet... MTU 1500 is so much a standard that it starts killing tunnels. MTU 1500 is not a working solution today thanks to (mostly linux based ? ) broken

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this. So mail lots of people. Cisco are I think now aware that their firewall products dont handle ECN correctly but others might not be. Or wait until more vendors roll out ECN - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread David Ford
I wrote:[...] err, s/MTU/MSS/ where applicable ;) -d -- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'." begin:vcard n:Ford;David x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:img

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread Alan Cox
Or wait until more vendors roll out ECN There is another big problem like that... tunnels actually do not work on todays real internet... MTU 1500 is so much a standard that it starts killing tunnels. MTU 1500 is not a working solution today thanks to (mostly linux based ? ) broken

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 12:07:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think they're mostly linux based. You can easily do that misconfiguration with most firewalls (i've often see it with Checkpoint for example) One word: masquerading. Unless they're using prehistoric kernels

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread David S. Miller
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:12:11 +0100 (BST) From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this. So mail lots of people. Cisco are I think now aware that their firewall products dont handle ECN correctly but others might not be.

Re: www.crucial.com won't talk to 2.4.0-test7 system

2000-09-02 Thread Alex Buell
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote: If Alan or myself tell Cisco about this bug, they are very unlikely to move very fast. But if some of their largest site customers begin to moan, expect a more timely fix :-) I have an contact at Cisco - I'll certainly raise this with him. Cheers,

Adaptec 2930U2 followup

2000-09-02 Thread Bob_Tracy
Thought it might be worth a followup report in case anyone was interested. All the problems I was seeing with my 2930U2 went bye-bye when I replaced my bottom-feeder M537 VXpro motherboard with a Tyan S1590S. Current setup is Linux 2.4.0-test7 with the aic7xxx driver compiled in. -- Bob Tracy

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre2

2000-09-02 Thread Jes Sorensen
"David" == David S Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 19:01:18 +0100 (BST) From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] o Acenic 0.45 fixes (Chip Salzenberg) David This adds a huge comment claiming to fix some race condition, David but no actual code is changed. How can this

Re: [patchlet] Removing unneeded line in vmtruncate() (2.4.0-t8p1)

2000-09-02 Thread Alexander Viro
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > Rasmus, you introduced a bug because you removed the code but left the > comment around. now /* this should go into ->truncate */ is there and very > confusing - what should go into ->truncate? ... except that comment is there for purpose.

Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad

2000-09-02 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Chris Evans wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > > > > > > Any of you tried copying a 2G file in the same (ext2) > > > > filesystem? It starts swapping like mad and

Re: Press release - here we go again!

2000-09-02 Thread J. Dow
> >And if got lost. That should tell you something. Perhaps something like > >"*Advanced interface support for USB, FireWire, and AGP!" > > > >Then place any expostulatory text indented under that as complete sentences. > >This treates the bulleted items as "titles". Your target audience

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread J. Dow
(Hm, I meant for a copy of this to go to the list, too. So here it is.) Mike Harris comments: > > I've heard comments from Alan, and others in the past bashing > > threads, and I can understand the "threads are for people who > > can't write state machines" comments I've heard, but what other >

Re: thread rant [semi-OT]

2000-09-02 Thread Dan Maas
> All portability issues aside, if one is writing an application in > Linux that one would be tempted to make multithreaded for > whatever reason, what would be the better Linux way of doing > things? Let's go back to basics. Look inside your computer. See what's there: 1) one (or more) CPUs 2)

[PATCH] fix ISA dependencies in pcmcia stuff

2000-09-02 Thread Paul Mackerras
Linus, The patch below adds #ifdef CONFIG_ISA to a couple of places in the pcmcia drivers. This patch allows me to use the cardbus slot on my Apple powerbook under linux-2.4.0-test8-pre1. Regards, Paul. diff -urN linux/drivers/pcmcia/cardbus.c bk/drivers/pcmcia/cardbus.c ---

Re: thread rant [semi-OT]

2000-09-02 Thread J. Dow
> In summary, when "multithreading" floats into your mind, think > "concurrency." Think very carefully about how you might simultaneously > exploit all of the independent resources in your computer. Due to the long > and complex history of OS development, a different API is usually required > to

Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-02 Thread Andrey Savochkin
Hello, On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 12:28:00PM +1100, David Luyer wrote: [snip] > We have a number of Linux hosts on this backbone with a primary address in > the network a.b.c.0/24 and a secondary address in the network d.e.f.0/24. [snip] > a.b.c.1 arp who-has d.e.f.2 > [snip] > Is this already

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread dean gaudet
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote: > I've heard comments from Alan, and others in the past bashing > threads, and I can understand the "threads are for people who > can't write state machines" comments I've heard, but what other > ways are there of accomplishing the goals that threads

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, dean gaudet wrote: > the thread bashing is mostly bashing programs which do things such as a > thread per-connection. this is the most obvious, and easy way to use > threads, but it's not necessarily the best performance, and certainly > doesn't scale. (on the scalability

Re: thread rant

2000-09-02 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, dean gaudet wrote: > yup you can do this without threads. apache-1.3+mod_ssl for example. > > but it's not fun, and it's a lot more work on the portability side. > inter-process shared memory and inter-process semaphores are > notoriously different across platforms...

Re: thread rant [semi-OT]

2000-09-02 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, J. Dow wrote: > Dan, another thing to consider with multithreading is that it is a way > to avoid "convoy" effects if there is a nice priority mechanism for > first in first out messaging. [...] yep, this is a frequent problem at the level of the kernel. We fixed such a

zero-copy TCP

2000-09-02 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Dan Maas wrote: > There are various other tricks that can be done to speed up network > servers, like passing files directly from the buffer cache to the > network card. This one is currently frowned upon by the Linux > community, [...] FYI, the TUX patch (released

  1   2   3   >