Re: 3c905C-TX [Fast Etherlink] problem ...

2001-05-22 Thread Robert Vojta
Hi, I had the same problem with 2.4.3-pre6 (also with the 3c905C). Alle problems were gone with 2.4.4, so I stopped bothering. Hope this helps... Hi, as I wrote in previous emails, I tried kernel 2.2.16, 2.2.19 and 2.4.x series (means 2.4.1, 2.4.3, 2.4.4) and still this error. So, I must

Weird bug in kernel (invalid operand?)

2001-05-22 Thread Carlos Laviola
I was getting the file ias9i_linux.tar from http://xxx:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/otn/linux/ias/9ias/ias9i_linux.tar (username and password masked to protect the innocent) and decided to take a peek at the contents of that (huge) file, using tar xfv ias9i_linux.tar. After a few moments, wget segfaulted. I

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac12 -- fs/fs.o: In function `bm_register_write':undefined reference to `lookup_one'

2001-05-22 Thread Miles Lane
ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \ --start-group \ arch/i386/kernel/kernel.o arch/i386/mm/mm.o kernel/kernel.o mm/mm.o fs/fs.o ipc/ipc.o \ drivers/char/char.o

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks

2001-05-22 Thread Hans Reiser
My apologies, I meant that the make is probably compiler bound (I said CPU bound) not FS bound. We find that one must use cp and similar utilities (not compilers) to become FS bound when using a Linux FS (unlike the older Unixes for which compiles were considered excellent benchmarks). Hans

Re: tmpfs + sendfile bug ?

2001-05-22 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Linus, On Mon, 21 May 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christoph Rohland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tmpfs does not provide the necessary functions for sendfile and lo: readpage, prepare_write and commitwrite. And I do not see a way how to provide readpage in tmpfs

Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch

2001-05-22 Thread God
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Udo A. Steinberg wrote: Gerhard Mack wrote: Its what I would describe as lack of enforcement by trading standards bodies, and I suspect what the US would call 'insufficient class action lawsuits' What we need is a web page for listing crap hardware so less

Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch

2001-05-22 Thread God
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Gerhard Mack wrote: Subject: Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch Its what I would describe as lack of enforcement by trading standards bodies, and I suspect what the US would call 'insufficient class action lawsuits' What we need is a web page for

Re: question: permission checking for network filesystem

2001-05-22 Thread Jan Hudec
You can write lookup so that it always succeeds and returns dummy inode without sending anything and do all the work in open inode operations. It'd be great if I could. But I can't. First, the inode data are checked by some vfs functions before driver is called (this being the bigest

Re: [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo

2001-05-22 Thread Martin.Knoblauch
Hi, while trying to enhance a small hardware inventory script, I found that cpuinfo is missing the details of L1, L2 and L3 size, although they may be available at boot time. One could of cource grep them from dmesg output, but that may scroll away on long lived systems. Any

RE: [reiserfs-dev] Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks

2001-05-22 Thread Ricardo Galli
My apologies, I meant that the make is probably compiler bound (I said CPU bound) not FS bound. We undertood ;-) cp -ar, and I would like Yura to try to reproduce the cp -ar as it seems too good to be true. We find that one must use cp and similar utilities (not The cp -a figures are

Re: [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo

2001-05-22 Thread Martin.Knoblauch
Martin.Knoblauch wrote: Hi, while trying to enhance a small hardware inventory script, I found that cpuinfo is missing the details of L1, L2 and L3 size, although they may be available at boot time. One could of cource grep them from dmesg output, but that may scroll away on long

Re: your mail

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas Palm
1. The corrupted files have the same length but differ (I cannot say on what bit-position) 2. I reproduced the problem while burning CD from SCSI-Disk to SCSI-CD-Burner!!! - It´s definetly not a (single?) IDE-Problem Burning CD (on slow 4x speed) seems to initialize many small transfers (instead

[newbie] some problem in my new hardware (serial)

2001-05-22 Thread Rich . Liu
I went to port a new hardware into linux kernel. this is a generic SuperIO chip . have 2serial port 1parallel in serial.c 's struct static struct pci_board pci_boards[] __devinitdata = { add my code { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ITE, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ITE_8872, PCI_ANY_ID,

SyncPPP IPCP/LCP loop problem and patch

2001-05-22 Thread rjd
I've hit a problem with the syncPPP module within Linux. Under certain conditions (hard to quantify exactly, but try several 8Mbps streams hitting a relatively slow, say 200MHz processor) the LCP/IPCP negotiation hits the following loop. A side state Packet B side

[newbie] timer in module

2001-05-22 Thread sebastien person
Début du message transféré : Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:39:30 +0200 From: sebastien person [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bart Trojanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] timer in module (fwd) Le Mon, 21 May 2001 19:35:25 -0400 (EDT) Bart Trojanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] a ecrit : this was my

Re: [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo

2001-05-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, 22 May 2001, David Weinehall wrote: Wouldn't that be the same reason we have /anything/ in cpuinfo? When /proc/cpuinfo was added, we didn't have /dev/cpu/*/cpuid Now that we do, we're stuck with keeping /proc/cpuinfo for compatability reasons. AFAIK, not all processors support

Re: ECN is on!

2001-05-22 Thread Bohdan Vlasyuk
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 01:10:31PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: This list is NOT exhaustive of domains with problems, it primarily lists only those who are subscribers of linux-kernel, and thus accumulated (al lot) more than 1 email with connection timed out status into vger's queue.

Q about ip_local_deliver_finish

2001-05-22 Thread Alexey Vyskubov
Hello. I have a question (maybe stupid but I spent a lot of time trying to find an answer)about ip_local_deliver_finish() in 2.4.4. kernel. I'll be very grateful if someone explains me what's happening. There is the following piece of code in ip_local_deliver_finish() (in net/ipv4/ip_input.c):

Re: ECN is on!

2001-05-22 Thread Graham Murray
Matti Aarnio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... and immediately I have been able to verify a bunch of domains/servers which won't get thru when incoming connection has ECN. As a matter of interest, are you also noting how many actually negotiate ECN rather than simply responding with a plain SYN

Re: Q about ip_local_deliver_finish

2001-05-22 Thread Alexey Vyskubov
If I understand correctly it means that if we have two different protocols with the same (modulo MAX_INET_PROTOS) protocol number then ip_local_deliver will return the return value of ipprot-handler for the first protocol in the chain inet_protos[protocol number modulo MAX_INET_PROTOS] and

Re: SyncPPP IPCP/LCP loop problem and patch

2001-05-22 Thread Paul Mackerras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've hit a problem with the syncPPP module within Linux. Under certain conditions (hard to quantify exactly, but try several 8Mbps streams hitting a relatively slow, say 200MHz processor) the LCP/IPCP negotiation hits the following loop. [snip] My solution in

Messaggio

2001-05-22 Thread Daria
Messaggio promozionale La societa' DOPLAND srl e' ora presente anche in Internet con oltre 14000 articoli,all'indirizzo http://www.dopland.com Articoli da regalo Orologi Occhiali da sole Articoli sportivi Telefonia Tutto scontato fino al 60%.Consegne entro 24/48 ore con formula soddisfatti o

PATCH: more esssolo1 cleanups

2001-05-22 Thread Marcus Meissner
Hi, I did some more cleanups: - changed PM to 2.4 pci module style - removed global list of devices, now using pci device data. I tried to add a pci_set_power_state(dev,3) in _remove, but this apparently has no effect (amplifier stays switched on), so I did not submit this part. Tested on IBM

Re: Weird bug in kernel (invalid operand?)

2001-05-22 Thread Andrew Morton
Carlos Laviola wrote: invalid operand: CPU:0 EIP:0010:[c48fb709] EFLAGS: 00010282 eax: 0019 ebx: ecx: c1272000 edx: c3f7bc20 esi: 00206c60 edi: c3ca5240 ebp: c0695aa0 esp: c1273e68 ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 Process snarf (pid: 324,

[patch] s_maxbytes handling

2001-05-22 Thread Andrew Morton
If -f_pos is positioned exactly at sb-s_maxbytes, a non-zero-length write to the file doesn't write anything, and write() returns zero. Consequently applications which try to append to a file which is s_maxbytes in length hang up, because write() just keeps on returning zero. We need to return

bug report (NMI, VIA, multi-pro, 2.4.4)

2001-05-22 Thread Thomas Herault
Hi! I found a problem in 2.4.4 kernel, who wasn't in 2.4.2. - Material : Processor : 2-PIII 800 Motherboard : MSI 694D PRO (MS-6321) with VIA VT82C694X chipset and Apollo Pro133A (VT82C694X) north bridge and

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/coda.h

2001-05-22 Thread Jan Harkes
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:24:20PM -0700, Me wrote: Coda.h assumes that __KERNEL__ can only be defined if __linux__ is, which is painfully false. This allows the kernel compile to get farther on my token FreeBSD box. -Ryan Are you trying to compile a Linux kernel on a FreeBSD machine,

Re: alpha iommu fixes

2001-05-22 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 10:53:39AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: diff -ruNp linux/arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c linux-new/arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c --- linux/arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c Fri Mar 2 11:12:07 2001 +++ linux-new/arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c Mon May 21 01:25:25

Re: debugging xterm.

2001-05-22 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Adam wrote: I'm trying to debug xterm and it seems like it is just not my day (I suppose the Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here in the README for xterm is for a reason there after all :P ) I running gdb on xterm. I'm running it as root, the current execution is at

Re: SyncPPP IPCP/LCP loop problem and patch

2001-05-22 Thread rjd
Paul Mackerras wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've hit a problem with the syncPPP module within Linux. Seems to me that when you get the conf-request in opened state, you should send your conf-request before sending the conf-ack to the peer's conf-request. I think this would

Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy

2001-05-22 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: David for the sake of the sanity of all concerned, do things one at a David time. Provide for merging into 2.5 a set of rules which David reproduce the existing CML1 behaviour in this respect. Can you define what you mean here? It's not really clear to me, and I

[PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Alexander Viro
Linus, patch below adds the missing half of kdev_t - for block devices we already have a unique pointer (struct block_device *, inode-i_bdev) and that adds a similar animal for character devices. That is, it adds a new structure (struct char_device) and a cache indexed by dev_t.

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/coda.h

2001-05-22 Thread Me
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 06:18, you wrote: Are you trying to compile a Linux kernel on a FreeBSD machine, or is this a bug in the Coda kernel module in the FreeBSD tree? Sorry, I should've been more specific. I'm trying to compile the Linux kernel (2.4.5pre3) on a FreeBSD machine, which

Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy

2001-05-22 Thread john slee
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Urban Widmark wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote: the NEW tag). That phase ended almost a month ago. Nobody who has actually tried the CML2 tools more recently has reported that the UI changes present any difficulty. What

Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy

2001-05-22 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 02:59, Keith Owens wrote: # Not a real dependency, this checks for hand editing of .config. $(KBUILD_OBJTREE)include/linux/autoconf.h: $(KBUILD_OBJTREE).config @echo Your .config is newer than include/linux/autoconf.h, this should not happen. @echo Always run

Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks

2001-05-22 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 04:41, Ricardo Galli wrote: Hi, you can find at http://bulma.lug.net/static/ a few new benchmarks among Reiser, XFS and Ext2 (also one with JFS). This time there is a comprehensive Hans' Mongo benchmarks (http://bulma.lug.net/static/mongo/ )and a couple of

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Tommy Hallgren
Hi Alexander! If I'm not entirely mistaken, this: + if ((flags (SLAB_CTOR_VERIFY|SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR)) == + SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR) + { + memset(cdev, 0, sizeof(*cdev)); + sema_init(cdev-sem, 1); + } +} could be replaced with this: + if ((flags SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR) ==

Linux 2.4.4-ac13

2001-05-22 Thread Alan Cox
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ Intermediate diffs are available from http://www.bzimage.org Rather than starting to propogate these fixes to other drivers I'd be greatful if the janitors would audit the changes

Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks

2001-05-22 Thread Shawn
Forbidden You don't have permission to access /~phillips/htree on this server. Apache/1.3.14 Server at nl.linux.org Port 80 On 05/22, Daniel Phillips rearranged the electrons to read: On Tuesday 22 May 2001

Final Warning [ was: ECN is on! ]

2001-05-22 Thread David Relson
At 10:18 AM 5/22/01, Steve Modica wrote: Perhaps it's none of my business, but it doesn't seem very sporting to just turn something on that breaks stuff and say you had fair warning. Why not shut it back off, issue a statement saying it works now and will be re-enabled on June 10th or

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Tommy Hallgren
Yes, I thought about it again, and you are right. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Tommy --- Mark Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + if ((flags (SLAB_CTOR_VERIFY|SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR)) == + SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR) ... + if ((flags SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR) == SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR)

Re: Final Warning [ was: ECN is on! ]

2001-05-22 Thread Matti Aarnio
Folks, don't speculate. You are late anyway. We just had ECN off for two hours, and all sites which didn't commit harakiri at their firewalls (bad TCP frame from that address, I will place that source into dead list) now either got their message, or are having some long-term troubles

Re: SyncPPP IPCP/LCP loop problem and patch

2001-05-22 Thread Paul Fulghum
Seems to me that when you get the conf-request in opened state, you should send your conf-request before sending the conf-ack to the peer's conf-request. I think this would short-circuit the loop (I could be wrong though, it's getting late). Thanks but I've already tried that. You get

Re: alpha iommu fixes

2001-05-22 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 06:44:09PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 04:29:16PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: Ivan could you test the above fix on the platforms that needs the align_entry hack? That was one of the first things I noticed, and I've tried exactly that

Re: Just FYI...

2001-05-22 Thread Michael Peddemors
H.. In principle this sounds good, but... This doesn't seem to be in best interest.. Taking it to the extreme, noone should code the linux kernel for buggy bios's, cards etc anymore either.. We should all tell em to upgrade their hardware? Almost every software application has made

Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]devicearguments from lookup)

2001-05-22 Thread Oliver Xymoron
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Monday 21 May 2001 19:16, Oliver Xymoron wrote: What I'd like to see: - An interface for registering an array of related devices (almost always two: raw and ctl) and their legacy device numbers with a single userspace callout that does

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Anton Altaparmakov
Hello, At 15:18 22/05/01, Alexander Viro wrote: [snip cool stuff] diff -urN S5-pre4/include/linux/fs.h S5-pre4-cdev/include/linux/fs.h --- S5-pre4/include/linux/fs.h Sat May 19 22:46:36 2001 +++ S5-pre4-cdev/include/linux/fs.h Tue May 22 09:14:25 2001 @@ -384,6 +384,14 @@ int

Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks

2001-05-22 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 12:29, Daniel Phillips wrote: The measured create and rename times for Ext2 look pretty silly, don't they? OK, I know that my htree directory index patch isn't part of Ext2 yet, but at least lets mention that this is a solved problem.

Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks

2001-05-22 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 22 May 2001 12:29, Daniel Phillips wrote: http://nl.linux.org/~phillips/htree Oops, nl.linux.org was down for 'unscheduled maintainance' and seems to have come back up with some some http issues. Rik? [/home]# chmod a+x *

Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code

2001-05-22 Thread Oliver Xymoron
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: It shouldn't be impossible to do the same thing to ioctl numbers. Nastier, yes. No question about it. But we don't necessarily have to redesign the whole approach - we only want to re-design the

Re: ECN is on!

2001-05-22 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:06:25AM -0400, Richard Gooch wrote: ... Sure, Dave is being bloody-minded, but that's the only way we'll see people get off their fat, lazy asses and fix their broken systems. In fact, hopefully he's still in a dark mood, and he may take up the suggestion to bounce

Re: Just FYI...

2001-05-22 Thread Dr. Michael Weller
On 22 May 2001, Michael Peddemors wrote: H.. In principle this sounds good, but... This doesn't seem to be in best interest.. Taking it to the extreme, noone should code the linux kernel for buggy bios's, cards etc anymore either.. We should all tell em to upgrade their hardware?

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Oliver Xymoron
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: Hello, At 15:18 22/05/01, Alexander Viro wrote: [snip cool stuff] +struct char_device { + struct list_headhash; + atomic_tcount; + dev_t dev; + atomic_t

Re: ECN is on!

2001-05-22 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 05:00:22PM +0100, Tony Hoyle wrote: suggestion to bounce mails of the following type: - MIME encoded - HTML encoded - quoted printables (those stupid =20 things are particuarly hard to read). Surely it'd be better to get the list to filter them through

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Alexander Viro
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Oliver Xymoron wrote: Because foo_ is a throwback to the days when C compilers had a single namespace for all structure elements, not a readability aid. If you need foo_ to know what type of structure you're futzing with, you need to name your variables better. Not

Re: parport problems with devfs

2001-05-22 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Nico Schottelius wrote: I attached the problem occured with parport and devfs. I don't exactly know where the problem in the parport source is. If someone has a patch for it, I will test it. [...] # make our own device out of /dev flapp:/ # mknod /lp0 c 6 0

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks

2001-05-22 Thread Hans Reiser
Ricardo Galli wrote: I was equally suprised, not only due to the wall-clock time but also to the CPU. So, I think the cache is the major player when compiling a kernel that was _just_ copied from another file system (still in buffer/cache). You might consider rebooting to flush the cache.

Re: ECN is on!

2001-05-22 Thread Richard Gooch
Matti Aarnio writes: On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:06:25AM -0400, Richard Gooch wrote: ... Sure, Dave is being bloody-minded, but that's the only way we'll see people get off their fat, lazy asses and fix their broken systems. In fact, hopefully he's still in a dark mood, and he may take up

Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy

2001-05-22 Thread John Stoffel
David You appear to be responding to my email, yet you did not do me David the courtesy of including me in the recipients. Should I assume David you're asking this question of me directly, or was it a David rhetorical question? It was more of an attempt to cutdown on the number of recipients,

[Q] [VFS] i_mapping vs. i_data ?

2001-05-22 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
Hello, I have the following question for VFS gurus here: In the inode struct, an address_space (i_data) and a pointer to an address_space (i_mapping) are defined, and it looks like i_mapping is always a reference to the inode's i_data (except in coda_open). Then what is the difference of

Mawanella

2001-05-22 Thread Mayank Vasa
Mawanella is one of the Sri Lanka's Muslim Village attachment: Mawanella.vbs

ALERTE: VIRUS DETECTE DANS UN MESSAGE ENVOYE PAR linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

2001-05-22 Thread virusalert
A L E R T E V I R U S Notre système de détection automatique anti-virus a détecté un virus dans un message qui vous a été envoyé par [EMAIL PROTECTED] La distribution de ce message a été stoppée. Veuillez vous rapprocher de l'émetteur [EMAIL PROTECTED] pour

RE: [PATCH] drivers/acpi/driver.c (repost)

2001-05-22 Thread Grover, Andrew
[trimmed CCs] Hi Philip, That code no longer exists in latest acpi snapshots, therefore it no longer has the bug ;-) I appreciate it, though. Regards -- Andy -Original Message- From: Philip Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 8:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Message de l'exploitation informatique FTMS

2001-05-22 Thread FTMS - Secure Mail
Un message contient un fichier au format VB ou VBS, interdit en réception/émission chez FTMS. Par sécurité, la pièce jointe a été supprimée du message. Information sur le message concerné :the following files were deleted: Mawanella.vbs

Re: [Q] [VFS] i_mapping vs. i_data ?

2001-05-22 Thread Alexander Viro
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Jean-Marc Saffroy wrote: Hello, I have the following question for VFS gurus here: In the inode struct, an address_space (i_data) and a pointer to an address_space (i_mapping) are defined, and it looks like i_mapping is always a reference to the inode's i_data

Re: write to dvd ram

2001-05-22 Thread quantum7
OK, I've asked this question four weeks in a row and received no response whatsoever. Linux is supposed to be the OS where you can turn to the newsgroups/IRC and get able help. This is to those who couldn't lift a finger to help with this compile/driver problem: Thanks for nothing, you

RE: [reiserfs-dev] Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks

2001-05-22 Thread Ricardo Galli
was _just_ copied from another file system (still in buffer/cache). You might consider rebooting to flush the cache. Is it possible to achieve the same by umounting/mounting the file system? --ricardo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of

Carefull: The Mawanella message has a virus with it. (Mawanella.v bs)

2001-05-22 Thread BAUDRILLARD ETIENNE
Carefull: The Mawanella message has a virus with it. (Mawanella.vbs) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

Re: write to dvd ram

2001-05-22 Thread cacook
OK, I've asked this question four weeks in a row and received no response whatsoever. Linux is supposed to be the OS where you can turn to the newsgroups/IRC and get able help. This is to those who couldn't lift a finger to help with this compile/driver problem: Thanks for nothing, you

Re: [PATCH]drivers/net/wan/lmc/lmc_main.c

2001-05-22 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Akash Jain wrote: Sorry if this is reposted, previous one seemed to get tied up. Here is a patch to the drivers/net/wan/lmc/lmc_main.c file. I got the previous one, here's a copy of my reply to the people who weren't cc'd on that one. Linus --- in a

Re: [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo

2001-05-22 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Martin.Knoblauch wrote: Hi, while trying to enhance a small hardware inventory script, I found that cpuinfo is missing the details of L1, L2 and L3 size, although they may be available at boot time. One could of cource grep them from dmesg output, but that may scroll away on long

Re: Final Warning [ was: ECN is on! ]

2001-05-22 Thread Joe Barr
What is ECN? Is it the reason SNORT has started this lately: snip Active System Attack Alerts =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= May 22 10:11:18 pooh snort: spp_portscan: PORTSCAN DETECTED from 199.183.24.194 (STEALTH) May 22 10:11:22 pooh snort: spp_portscan: portscan status from 199.183.24.194:

Re: [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo

2001-05-22 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Martin.Knoblauch wrote: After some checking, I could have made the answer a bit less terse: - it would require that the kernel is compiled with cpuid [module] support - not everybody may want enable this, just for getting one or two harmless numbers. If so, then that's their

Re: Carefull: The Mawanella message has a virus with it. (

2001-05-22 Thread Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (BAUDRILLARD ETIENNE) writes: Carefull: The Mawanella message has a virus with it. (Mawanella.vbs) Because I presume that most of us use Unix, we do not really care... Thanks anyway! -- Mathieu CHOUQUET-STRINGER E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Learning French is

Re: Final Warning [ was: ECN is on! ]

2001-05-22 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:55:59AM -0500, Joe Barr wrote: What is ECN? Is it the reason SNORT has started this lately: http://vger.kernel.org/ Follow the links, and you will get an exellent answer. snip Active System Attack Alerts =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= May 22 10:11:18 pooh

Re: SyncPPP IPCP/LCP loop problem and patch

2001-05-22 Thread Paul Fulghum
Seems to me that when you get the conf-request in opened state, you should send your conf-request before sending the conf-ack to the peer's conf-request. I think this would short-circuit the loop (I could be wrong though, it's getting late). Thanks but I've already tried that. You get

Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy

2001-05-22 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I don't agree with this, since the current CML1 scheme has wierd, unwanted and wrong dependencies already, which can't (or haven't) been found. Since it would be put in during the 2.5.x branching, it's expected that things will/can/should break, so I don't think

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Oliver Xymoron
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: On Tue, 22 May 2001, Oliver Xymoron wrote: Because foo_ is a throwback to the days when C compilers had a single namespace for all structure elements, not a readability aid. If you need foo_ to know what type of structure you're futzing with,

Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy

2001-05-22 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 16:42, john slee wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Urban Widmark wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote: the NEW tag). That phase ended almost a month ago. Nobody who has actually tried the CML2 tools more recently has reported that

Re: write to dvd ram

2001-05-22 Thread David Weinehall
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:38:49AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I've asked this question four weeks in a row and received no response whatsoever. Linux is supposed to be the OS where you can turn to the newsgroups/IRC and get able help. This is to those who couldn't lift a finger to

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Alexander Viro
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Oliver Xymoron wrote: Not always. If the thing is used all over the tree, it'd better be greppable. I hate the foo-de stuff - it's not localized and it's impossible to grep for. I'd like to say the compiler will happily find it for you, but the kernel's mostly

why DMAable memory restriction ?

2001-05-22 Thread hiren_mehta
Hi LIst, In the linux kernel there is a limitation on the amount of contiguous DMAable memory that can be allocated (I guess about 128K). Does anobody know what is the reason for such a restriction ? Is there any plan to remove this restriction in the future releases of kernel ? Regards, -hiren

Re: [patch] s_maxbytes handling

2001-05-22 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: verification tests. So unless you can cite page and paragraph from SuS and the LFS spec I think the 0 might in fact be correct.. I don't know the standards Alan, but returning zero from write() when f_pos is at s_maxbytes

bdflush/mm performance drop-out defect (more info)

2001-05-22 Thread null
Here is some additional info about the 2.4 performance defect. Only one person offered a suggestion about the use of HIGHMEM. I tried with and without HIGHMEM enabled with the same results. However, it does appear to take a bit longer to reach performance drop-out condition when HIGHMEM is

Re: Mawanella

2001-05-22 Thread Bob McElrath
Mayank Vasa [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Mawanella is one of the Sri Lanka's Muslim Village Looks like a vbs virus to me. Thankfully, we all run linux here...sucker. -- Bob Bob McElrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics PGP signature

Changes in Kernel

2001-05-22 Thread Prasad
We are interested in making some changes to the linux kernel so that it supports some indian type fonts on the console... so what are the special things that we sould take care of so that our work would be included in the kernel-distribution, and how do we proceed about getting it included in

Re: [Patch] Output of L1,L2 and L3 cache sizes to /proc/cpuinfo

2001-05-22 Thread Alan Cox
- you would need a utility with root permission to analyze the cpuid info. The cahce info does not seem to be there in clear ascii. Bullsh*t. /dev/cpu/%d/cpuid is supposed to be mode 444 (world readable.) Yep. cpuid is not priviledged. There are almost no cases you would want it to

Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks

2001-05-22 Thread David N. Lombard
Rik van Riel wrote: On Tue, 22 May 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 22 May 2001 12:29, Daniel Phillips wrote: http://nl.linux.org/~phillips/htree Oops, nl.linux.org was down for 'unscheduled maintainance' and seems to have come back up with some some http issues. Rik?

Re: [patch] s_maxbytes handling

2001-05-22 Thread David N. Lombard
Linus Torvalds wrote: [deletia] So returning 0 for write() is usually a bad idea - exactly because it does not have very well-defined semantics. So -EFBIG is certainly the preferable return value, and seems to be what SuS wants, too. And what LFS wants too: 2.2.1.27 write() and writev()

Re: Changes in Kernel

2001-05-22 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] By author:Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel We are interested in making some changes to the linux kernel so that it supports some indian type fonts on the console... so what are the special things that we sould take care of so

Re: bdflush/mm performance drop-out defect (more info)

2001-05-22 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Tue, 22 May 2001, null wrote: Here is some additional info about the 2.4 performance defect. Only one person offered a suggestion about the use of HIGHMEM. I tried with and without HIGHMEM enabled with the same results. However, it does appear to take a bit longer to reach

Xircom RealPort versus 3COM 3C3FEM656C

2001-05-22 Thread Dax Kelson
I currently have three Xircom RealPort Carbus modem/fast ethernet cards. The current driver blows major chunks (it has very poor performance, and stops working under load). I'm told the driver issues are because of hardware issues. The really nice feature of this card is the form factor though.

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Guest section DW
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:08:16AM -0500, Oliver Xymoron wrote: + struct list_headhash; Why not name consistently with the struct block_device? struct list_headcd_hash; Because foo_ is a throwback to the days when C compilers had a single namespace for

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Alexander Viro
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Guest section DW wrote: One often has to go through all occurrences of a variable or field of a struct. That is much easier with cd_hash and cd_dev than with hash and dev. No, it is a good habit, these prefixes, even though it is no longer necessary because of the C

Re: [patch] s_maxbytes handling

2001-05-22 Thread Andries . Brouwer
Linus writes: 0 is EOF _for_reads_. For writes it is not very well defined Hmm. So -EFBIG is certainly the preferable return value, Yes. The Austin 6th draft writes EFBIG: An attempt was made to write a file that exceeds the implementation-defined maximum file size or the

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Oliver Xymoron
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Guest section DW wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:08:16AM -0500, Oliver Xymoron wrote: + struct list_headhash; Why not name consistently with the struct block_device? struct list_headcd_hash; Because foo_ is a throwback to the

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Andries . Brouwer
Alexander Viro writes: patch below adds the missing half of kdev_t - for block devices we already have a unique pointer and that adds a similar animal for character devices. Very good. (Of course I did precisely the same, but am a bit slower in submitting things during a stable series or

Re: [PATCH] struct char_device

2001-05-22 Thread Alexander Viro
On Tue, 22 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One remark, repeating what I wrote on some web page: - A struct block_device provides the connection between a device number and a struct block_device_operations. ... Clearly, we also want to associate a struct char_device_operations to

scheduling callbacks in user space triggered via kernel....

2001-05-22 Thread Raj, Ashok
Hello Gurus... Is there a method to schedule user mode code from kernel agent? basically think that when some work is to be scheduled in user mode, the app registers with the kernel mode agent with a function/parm to run, then when the callback is appropriate the kerenl agent triggers this

Re: Kernel diff_small_2.4.5pre4_2.4.5pre5

2001-05-22 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:04:39PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: diff -urN 2.4.5pre4/arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c 2.4.5pre5/arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c --- 2.4.5pre4/arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c Sun Apr 1 01:17:07 2001 +++ 2.4.5pre5/arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c Tue May 22 22:04:07

  1   2   3   4   5   >