I'm looking for confirmations on any kind of correlation between
the problems people have been having with the assorted VIA IDE
chipsets and possible overheating of said chipsets.
I'm asking because I suffered from the VIA-chipset-ate-my-data
bug, and I've been trying to reproduce it to no
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rainer Wiener wrote:
> I hope you can help me. I have a problem with my on board soundcard and
> seti. I have a Gigabyte GA-7ZX Creative 5880 sound chip. I use the kernel
> driver es1371 and it works goot. But when I run seti@home I got some noise
> in my sound when I play
Woohoo! Thanks Peter.
You are correct. I just built and installed util-linux-2.10s
from source. I ran through the cross-mounting scenario
and was able to unmount all the partitions on the USB
external drive and then unload all the USB drivers.
Perhaps util-linux-2.10s should be made the new
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 07:46:31PM -0500, Byron Stanoszek wrote:
> > yea i know. . same mode i also had a big problem with DMA timeouts on
> > 2.4 so .. i dont know what's up with 2.4 and my motherboard ...2.2
> > hasn't shown a single irq or DMA error yet since going back to it.
> >
Andre Hedrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 31 Jan 2001, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
>
> > Andre Hedrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > > > But there is no indication of what the problems could be,
> > > > or what he thinks the geometry should be (and why).
> > > > I see nothing very
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Michael J. Dikkema wrote:
>
> I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
> filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
> thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
> tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1
I just tried to boot 2.4.1 kernel on Alpha UP1100. This machine
happens to have two SCSI disks on sym53c875 controller and two IDE
drives hooked to a builtin "Acer Laboratories Inc. [ALi] M5229 IDE".
It boots and in the first moment makes even a pretty good impression
of beeing healthy. But an
I used regular gcc 2.95.2 and it compiled and linked without problems.
Thanks.
Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> pgcc borks 2.4.1 kernel and prereleases (sadly I found this out the same
> way).
>
> Shawn.
> Matt Yourst wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just tried to compile 2.4.1 and I'm getting the error
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:52:58PM -0500, safemode wrote:
> My KA7 can go over 160Mhz FSB
> Yes i know about memory speed limitions ..that's why you are able to choose
> HW clock - PCI so at those high speeds it's actually say 120Mhz - 33
> keeping you below or near 100 and not well over
I hope this bug was not the result of my cc'ing Linus
on some emails and not on others, because this bug is a mistake
that I made a few weeks ago and then fixed when it was immediately
pointed out to me by some smart person on the acpi list.
The test "((1 << bit_granularity) -1)
Hi!
> I've just tried to compile hdparm v3.9 with a vanilla 2.4.1 tree.
> Gcc complained about serveral parse errors in /usr/include/linux/string.h.
> Compiling with an >=ac6 release works fine.
> Why isn't the little string.h fix not included in 2.4.1?
>
> Regards, Gregor
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:57:45PM -0500, safemode wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > better than i ever got with 2.4 even when only one drive was on a channel.
> > > Right now my k7-2 750 is at 849mhz with a FSB of 114Mhz and PCI at 34Mhz.
> >
> > Hint: people who overclock machines get suprising
You want to port Linux/MIPS? It's already happening:
http://oss.sgi.com/mips/
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:43:29PM +0800, Greeen-III wrote:
> Greetings,
> I am a new guy in MIPS.
> I want to port Linux/MIPS.
> Is there any mail list I should join into?
> I have a trouble in gunzip the ramdisk.
>
(Chris, changing JOURNAL_MAX_BATCH from 900 to 100 didn't affect
anything).
Ok, having approached this slightly more intelligently here are [better]
results.
The dumps are large so they are located at http://stuph.org/VM/. Here's
the story. I boot and startx, I load xmms and netscape to eat
Greetings,
I am a new guy in MIPS.
I want to port Linux/MIPS.
Is there any mail list I should join into?
I have a trouble in gunzip the ramdisk.
Appreciate in advance.
**
* It's Green!! (¸UªL©ú)
* TEL: 886-2-23776100 ext.620
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:31:36PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Unfortunately getting the same IP is rare now, so I've been toying with
Pretty much dependant of the type of equipment and the configuration used
at the ISP's servers. I use two ISPs when I'm back in Germany of which
the one
Hi all,
I try to port Linux/MIPS. When the Ramdisk bigger than
certain size, the kernel fail to gunzip it.
Could you give me a way to find this bug?
Thanks.
* It's Green!! (¸UªL©ú)
* TEL: 886-2-23776100 ext.620
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Working at
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:00:09PM +, Padraig Brady wrote:
> Chris Hanson wrote:
>
> >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:48:50 +
> >From: Padraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Are you using the 3c59x driver?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Can we sort this out once and for all? There are a few
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, John R Lenton wrote:
>
> I'm looking for confirmations on any kind of correlation between
> the problems people have been having with the assorted VIA IDE
> chipsets and possible overheating of said chipsets.
>
I used to have problems with my motherboard in nearly all
md_setup() in linux-2.4.1/drivers/md.c references name_to_kdev_t.
Since name_to_kdev_t is not exported from the kenrel, this causes an
undefined symbol problem when md is built as a module. However,
md_setup is not used when md is a module. So, the correct fix
is to make sure that
This is just a warning to those of you who
(are so foolhardy as to:-)) use CVS binutils to build
the linux kernel. The current CVS ld requires that
the option
ld ... -oformat binary ...
now be written as
ld ... --oformat binary ...
Note the two dashes.
This breakage occurs in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> When run from a normal user account with its current working directory
> on a NFS filesystem, usermode linux causes the host machine's kernel
> to enter a hosed state. No processes (including UML) seem to respond,
> and the machine becomes unusable.
Just to clarify
This is the kind of problem I have been experiancing.
It either hangs on boot, or in a compile...
However I am using an NCR 810 and a scsi disk..
My board is the Compaq PC164 {some nasty partnumber}
The Servers all have the Qlogic ISP controller for the main disk.
both setups have only the
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still /dev/discs/disc0/part1?
I can't even get a shell with
>My first comment is that this looks very heavyweight indeed. Isn't it
>just over-engineered?
Yes, I know it is, in its current form (sigh !).
But at the same time, I do not want to give up (not yet, at least) on
trying to arrive at something that can serve the objectives, and yet be
simple
When run from a normal user account with its current working directory on a
NFS filesystem, usermode linux causes the host machine's kernel to enter a
hosed state. No processes (including UML) seem to respond, and the machine
becomes unusable.
I am running 2.2.18 built with SMP and hedrick's IDE
GET YOUR OWN 100 MEG WEBSITE FOR ONLY $11.95 PER MONTH TODAY!
STOP PAYING $19.95 or more TODAY for your web site, WHEN YOU CAN
GET ONE FOR ONLY $11.95 PER MONTH!
DO YOU ALREADY HAVE A WEBSITE? ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS TRANSFER THE
DOMAIN TO OUR SERVERS AND UPLOAD YOUR DATA AND YOU ARE READY TO
Quim K Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then maybe the attached patch is what you want? This also replaces
> `+' on the next line with `^' to avoid slanted distribution.
Thanks. The use of + in a hash-formula is usually all right, though. It's
XOR with carry propagation; when there's some
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 07:28:01PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Do the following modifications to your wait queue extension sound
>> reasonable ?
>>
>> 1. Change add_wait_queue to add elements to the end of queue (fifo, by
>> default) and instead have an add_wait_queue_lifo()
ok!!
archan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Jasen wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, archan wrote:
>
>> I am using "Pixel View TV tuner card" based on "bttv". It works perfect
>> in Windows with default TV application, and also responding well in
>> Linux 2.2.17 and 2.4.0-test10 kernel.
> > The problem the diff below fixes is a BIOS issue - the _STA
> control method
> > should always be returning a value, but in this case it doesn't. The
> > approach we're taking is "get everything working and THEN
> worry about broken
> > ACPI implementations" and hopefully in the meantime,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Greg from Systems wrote:
> I've been playing with the 2.4.0 kernel scince you gave me the patch for
> the alphas...
>
> What I have found is that it tends to randomly hang...
> No Panic, no OOPs, no nothing...
> The machine is a PC164, Which falls under the EB164 class.
> It
Keith Owens wrote:
>
> The only bit that could run in parallel is this one.
>
> .PHONY: $(patsubst %, _modinst_%, $(SUBDIRS))
> $(patsubst %, _modinst_%, $(SUBDIRS)) :
> $(MAKE) -C $(patsubst _modinst_%, %, $@) modules_install
>
> The erase must be done first (serial), then make
Steve, writes:
> Is there any reason why we can't auto-detect/bring up volume-groups in the
> kernel instead of creating a ramdisk volume to do a vgscan and then mount a
> rootlv?
Um, yes, because it won't work. The user tools do the I/O of LVM state
information to the disk. The kernel LVM
On 31 Jan 2001, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > The card is a video only capture that came with a camera (and has a
> > connector to power that camera next to the video connector).
>
> Sure the box is really dead? These very cheap cards with just the bt848
[snip]
> some sanity checks on the i2c bus
> Cool! I want one. So ... is there any way to know if and when Linux
> kernel support will be available? I assume AMD doesn't follow the MPS
> 1.x standards.
As far as I am aware they will be following the software interface.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Here's the latest StackGuard patch for the 2.4.1 kernel.
greg k-h
--
greg@(kroah|wirex).com
diff -Naur -X dontdiff linux-2.4.1/Makefile linux-2.4.1-greg/Makefile
--- linux-2.4.1/MakefileWed Jan 31 17:15:05 2001
+++ linux-2.4.1-greg/Makefile Wed Jan 31 17:14:11 2001
@@ -227,6
Hi,
I was playing around with Gnome when I got this Kernel BUG in my syslog.
Kernel is 2.4.0 running on updated RedHat 7. My box is a Pentium III
(440BX)
with 256 MB RAM.
System just froze, I could not move the mouse or switch virtual console,
after
hitting SysRq repeatedly the system finally
2.4.1 - make bzImage modules
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX=y
# CONFIG_PDC202XX_BURST is not set
drivers/ide/idedriver.o: In function `pci_init_pdc202xx':
drivers/ide/idedriver.o(.text.init+0x1ac4): undefined reference to
`pdc202xx_display_info'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
--
L1: khromy
Dunlap, Randy wrote:
>> From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
>>>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 07:48:29PM +, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 17:30:38 -0600 (+), Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
> > I'm not positive if this is a bug, I'm only able to confirm this from one
> > other source. Somewhere between (I can't remember exactly which kernel
I ask because I note that mine isn't working with the USB-->PS/2
adapter and the PSMOUSE driver in 2.4.x, but 2.2.x works fine.
Basically, the mouse gives random events to the kernel when
moved. At the very least, they do not match up with where I actually
move the mouse.
This is on an
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:02:03 -0800,
LA Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This seems to serialize the delete, run the mod-installs in parallel, then run the
>depmod when they are done.
It works, until somebody does this
make -j 4 modules modules_install
There is not, and never has been, any
Byron Stanoszek wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, safemode wrote:
>
> > yea i know. . same mode i also had a big problem with DMA timeouts on
> > 2.4 so .. i dont know what's up with 2.4 and my motherboard ...2.2
> > hasn't shown a single irq or DMA error yet since going back to it.
> >
Once upon a time, David Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>The largest bodies of text come from scsi, irda, usb, and udf.
Don't forget software RAID. You get gobs of output from autodetect and
startup of each filesystem (so if you have 6 or so RAID filesystems, you
can get over 13kB of messages).
# IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support
CONFIG_IEEE1394=y
# CONFIG_IEEE1394_PCILYNX is not set
CONFIG_IEEE1394_OHCI1394=y
CONFIG_IEEE1394_VIDEO1394=y
CONFIG_IEEE1394_RAWIO=y
# CONFIG_IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG is not set
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-f
Malcolm Beattie writes:
> David S. Miller writes:
> >
> > At the usual place:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1-1.diff.gz
>
> Hmm, disappointing results here; maybe I've missed something.
As discussed elsewhere there is a %10 to %15 performance
They are supposed to be available near the end of this quarter. the
manufacturers of the first two will be tyan and gigabyte (all according to
current amd rumors). AMD Demoed several quad athlon systems on the first
of this month, so hope for that soon as well.
Nick
On Wed, 31 Jan
Dax Kelson said once upon a time (Wed, 31 Jan 2001):
>
> # IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support
> CONFIG_IEEE1394=y
> # CONFIG_IEEE1394_PCILYNX is not set
> CONFIG_IEEE1394_OHCI1394=y
> CONFIG_IEEE1394_VIDEO1394=y
> CONFIG_IEEE1394_RAWIO=y
> # CONFIG_IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG is not set
I noticed when I
[David Lang]
> about the third story down is one mentioning SMP athlon boards
> actually starting to show up
Cool! I want one. So ... is there any way to know if and when Linux
kernel support will be available? I assume AMD doesn't follow the MPS
1.x standards.
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from
"Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
>
> Following is the 82489DX-ized version of the patch. I believe it's fine,
> but I would feel safer if others test it before I send it to Linus.
Your latest patch passes all my testing.
2.4.1+irq-whacker+netperf:APIC dies instantly
> From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:01:08 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
> >
> >>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:25:22 -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
> >>>
> ...
> Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66
> >>>
> >>
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:44:29 -0500 (EST),
Eric Kasten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Quick bug report for kernel 2.4.1. There needs to be a
>EXPORT_SYMBOL(name_to_kdev_t); at the bottom of linux/init/main.c.
>name_to_kdev_t is used by the md driver (and maybe others). If the
>driver is built as a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Chandler) writes:
> As I was building 2.4.1 afresh I took the opportunity to build some of
> the device drivers as modules. In particular I have a SCSI cdrom
> device (it actually is a cd writer) and I had made that and its
> controller (Adaptec AIC-7xxx driver) modules.
Is there any reason why we can't auto-detect/bring up volume-groups in the
kernel instead of creating a ramdisk volume to do a vgscan and then mount a
rootlv?
Just trying to see if there is a way (or would make sense) to skip the
ramdisk stage in mounting a root logical volume.
Steve
-
To
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, safemode wrote:
> yea i know. . same mode i also had a big problem with DMA timeouts on
> 2.4 so .. i dont know what's up with 2.4 and my motherboard ...2.2
> hasn't shown a single irq or DMA error yet since going back to it.
> currently 2.2.19-pre7 is using UDMA4
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:17:56 -0700,
"Josh Higham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c
You compiled your kernel with support for ELF objects as a module. You
execute an ELF program, the kernel tries to autoload the ELF module
using modprobe which is an
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Paul Powell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a bootable linux CD that runs a custom init.
> Under most versions of linux init runs as process ID
> one. Under my bootable CD, it runs as process ID 15.
> I need it to run as PID 1 so that I can execute a
> kill(-1,15) without
Hi!
I played a bit with acpi on my toshiba, and got following figures
(toshiba satellite 4030cdt):
system powered on, disk spinning, backlight on, low brightness 12.8W
high brigtness +0.8W
no backlight
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Gabor Lenart wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:06:07PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Does Linus or anyone object to raising the ksmg buffer from 16K to 32K?
> > > 4/5 systems I have now overflow the buffer during boot before init is
> > > even launched.
> >
> > Thats just
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:24:39AM +, James Sutherland wrote:
> > 32 megaBLOCK?? How big is it in Mbytes?
>
> Blocksize is 4k, mkreiserfs in my version is telling me it can not generate
> partitions smaller than 32M but it is not true, i have to
...fails on ARM with ESTALE (116):
Looking up port of RPC 13/2 on 192.168.0.4
Looking up port of RPC 15/2 on 192.168.0.4
nfs_get_root: getattr error = 116
nfs_read_super: get root inode failed
VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
It seems to be related to these two
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:40:52PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 01:05:02AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > >
> > > > However, the pages which are contiguous on
Matt Yourst wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to compile 2.4.1 and I'm getting the error "undefined
> reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'" when trying to do the final
> link. It looks like this check was something 2.4.1 added to
> include/asm-i386/bugs.h to fail the kernel build if part of the
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, James Sutherland wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Parity/ECC on main memory is reported by the chipset and needs seperate
> > drivers or apps to handle this
> Yes - MCE only covers errors in the CPU's cache, IIRC? (Is there still an
> NMI on main memory
On 01.31 Igor Mozetic wrote:
> Andrew Prins writes:
> > in 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 on a pentium 3 with an onboard adaptec AIC-7896, i
> > receive the following after it is detected:
> >
> > scsi: aborting command due to timeout: pid 0, scsi0, channel 0, id 0
> > lun 0 Inquiry 00 00 00 ff 00
>
> I my
Hi!
This patch fixes ACPI oops on my toshiba.. This should go to Linus.
--- clean/drivers/acpi/cmbatt.c Wed Jan 31 16:14:26 2001
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/cmbatt.c Wed Jan 31 21:03:47 2001
@@ -163,11 +167,13 @@
result->battery_capacity_granularity_1=objs[7].integer.value;
You need to get the latest modutils: the directory tree under /lib/modules
changed recently and that's why it works if you create symlinks...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Timothy A. DeWees") writes:
> You need to create a symlink
>
> ln -s /lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/drivers/net /lib/modules/2.4.1/net
>
Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 01:05:02AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >
> > > However, the pages which are contiguous on swap are not necessarily
> > > contiguous in the virtual
I tried compiling a 2.2.18 kernel, and when I reboot I get
failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c
scrolling past the screen.
A web search reveals a comment about 2.3.99pre3, which indicates that it is
a problem with the USB config (video4linux must be compiled in the kernel?).
I am
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Yes. First program to run get PID 1.
>
> Solution : fork() in init and load the modules in the child.
>
Or finish your script with "exec init".
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL
Andrew Prins writes:
> in 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 on a pentium 3 with an onboard adaptec AIC-7896, i
> receive the following after it is detected:
>
> scsi: aborting command due to timeout: pid 0, scsi0, channel 0, id 0
> lun 0 Inquiry 00 00 00 ff 00
I my case machine doesn't even boot.
You might try
Andreas Huppert wrote:
> > I have been trying to mount the dos-partition /dev/hdb1 on /dos/d for
> > three years and it fails:
Yes. It has 805998 data sectors, which require 50374 clusters,
but the fat16 has room only to describe 39168 clusters.
The kernel mount code considers this an error.
Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, safemode wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering... Perhaps it's a problem motherboard specific. I'm
> > using the KA7 and saw pretty bad problems (extreme fs corruption)
> > and bad latency. Perhaps the K7V and the KT7's dont have this problem.
> > I dont see
Hi!
With acpi support turned on, maestro does not work. Turn acpi off, and
maestro is working, again.
Pavel
--
I'm [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t.
The problem the diff below fixes is a BIOS issue - the _STA control method
should always be returning a value, but in this case it doesn't. The
approach we're taking is "get everything working and THEN worry about broken
ACPI implementations" and hopefully in the meantime, people will release
> "William" == William Knop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William> Correct me if I'm wrong, but DevFS only makes /dev
William> entries when a device is present, and the device is not
William> present until the module is loaded. So if I want to
William> access /dev/hda and the
Rik van Riel writes:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > While reclaiming swap space when you run out is pretty
> > > trivial to do, Linus doesn't seem to like the idea all
> > > that much and Disk Space Is Cheap(tm) so it's not very
>
I am using kernel v2.4.0 on Abit BP6 with two Intel Pentium Celeron
366@517Mhz + video based on Riva TNT2 M64 32Mb + network card 3com 3c905b
+ Creative Sound Blaster 64 pnp isa and hercules video card. I'm geting
all over the time messages like that:
Jan 31 23:37:16 Zeus kernel: APIC error on
I am running kernel v2.4.1 (gcc2.95.2/glibc-2.1.3) and have been getting
the following errors sent to the console. I saw reference to this to a BP6
MB
but nothing about the Tyan S2505 (Tiger 200) MB. I've tried two different
MB's so far and both exhibit the same problem?
APIC error on CPU0:
On Jan 24 2001, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer wrote:
> Moreover, few ethernet cards are able to compute the ip checksum so
> linux doesn't need anymore to do that.
I'm very ignorant when it comes to Ethernet, but I'd like to
know which cards have this feature, as I'm planning on
I decided recently to go bleeding-edge on one of my Linux boxes and
discovered I had a problem with module loading while using DevFS.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but DevFS only makes /dev entries when a device is
present, and the device is not present until the module is loaded. So if I
want to
"Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > Does Linus or anyone object to raising the ksmg buffer from 16K to 32K?
> > > 4/5 systems I have now overflow the buffer during boot before init is
> > > even launched.
> >
> > Thats just an indication that 2.4.x is
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, William Knop wrote:
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but DevFS only makes /dev entries when a device is
> present, and the device is not present until the module is loaded. So if I
> want to access /dev/hda and the IDE module has not been loaded yet, I will
>
One thing that
pgcc borks 2.4.1 kernel and prereleases (sadly I found this out the same
way).
Shawn.
Matt Yourst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to compile 2.4.1 and I'm getting the error "undefined
> reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'" when trying to do the final
> link. It looks like this check was
(cc's shortened, not to trash Linus et al)
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Robert Siemer wrote:
> Is it possible to directly ask the 'IRQ-router' (namely the
> ISA-bridge) for what it is set up for? - I mean which IRQ is routed to
> what without the help of the BIOS?
It's written in the PCI config
Matt Yourst wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to compile 2.4.1 and I'm getting the error "undefined
> reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'" when trying to do the final
> link. It looks like this check was something 2.4.1 added to
> include/asm-i386/bugs.h to fail the kernel build if part of the
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Grzegorz Sojka wrote:
> I am using kernel v2.4.0 on Abit BP6 with two Intel Pentium Celeron
> 366@517Mhz + video based on Riva TNT2 M64 32Mb + network card 3com 3c905b
> + Creative Sound Blaster 64 pnp isa and hercules video card. I'm geting
> all over the time messages like
Adam Sampson wrote
> Are you sure you get the same results with 2.4.1?
Yes, I'm sure. In fact I just downloaded the 2.4.1 kernel to test if
this was fixed.
> I'm in the exact
> same position (G200 on a Gigabyte GA5AX with ALi M1541/3). There was a
> patch to properly support AGP on these
> Yes, but if SMP for Athlons is not supported, what is the point in
> allowing CONFIG_SMP + CONFIG_MK7 (or CONFIG_SMP + CONFIG_MK6)? Such a
> kernel will not run on *any* SMP system, since AMD kernels do not work
> on Intel. If an AMD user really wants to carry around SMP baggage for
> no
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > In the intel databook. Generally an MCE indicates hardware/power/cooling
> > > issues
> >
> > Doesn't an MCE also cover some hardware memory problems - parity/ECC
> > issues etc?
>
> Parity/ECC on main memory is reported by the chipset and needs
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Lukasz Gogolewski wrote:
>
> After I compiled kernel 2.4.1 on rh 6.2 I enabled module support for 2
> of those devices.
>
> However when I rebooted my machine both of those devices are not
> working.
>
> I don't know what's wrong since I did make moudle and make
>
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:15:56PM +, James Sutherland wrote:
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/loop.img count=32768 size=4096
>
> That just creates a 128Mb file of zeros... This sounds a bit small. Why
> "size=4096"??
because i am too tired to calculate. mkreiserfs wants 32768 (32*1024) blocks
I've been playing with the 2.4.0 kernel scince you gave me the patch for
the alphas...
What I have found is that it tends to randomly hang...
No Panic, no OOPs, no nothing...
The machine is a PC164, Which falls under the EB164 class.
It exhibits this behaviour on both the "generic" and
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Lukasz Gogolewski wrote:
>
> any suggestions on how to fix it?
>
Oh, and I might add that all the URLs for the new programs that you have
to get, are contained in the same file, Documentation/Changes.
- Mike
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > If the pci_enable_device() thing is to be added to the drivers, it must
> > preferently be placed after the checking against RAID attachement.
>
> You cant check the signature until the device has been enabled. Maybe you
> could poke the LSI guys and
> From: Drew Bertola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > This is a temporary interface, just to see if we're returning values
> > properly. Your points below are well taken. People really care about
> > minutes/percentage remaining. In your opinion should we
> just report that
> > through /proc or
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Mark Lord wrote:
> > Even better would be to add a stage in front of the fall-back,
> > which queries the BIOS (from kernel startup code) for translation
> > info on ALL drives.
> Maybe a compile option could help...
kernel
Well, just so you know I am now building a 2.4.1 kernel for this machine so
I can use devfs.
So perhaps I'll try ReiserFS on this too... lots of fun :)
Thanks for everyone's kind words of wisdom.
--
Michael Pacey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 105498469
wd21 ltd - world domination in the 21st
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Kasten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 8:44 PM
Subject: BUG: v2.4.1 missing EXPORT_SYMBOL
> Hi,
>
> Quick bug report for kernel 2.4.1. There needs to be a
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(name_to_kdev_t); at the bottom of
1 - 100 of 579 matches
Mail list logo
