Re: ide / usb problem

2001-02-26 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 03:23:18PM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: > > the cable length in mind. Anybody out there know if there's a max cable > > length for the ATA/100 spec?? > > 18", like *all* ide/ata cables. Actually the ATA/66 and ATA/100 cables are specified to be exactly 18", not longer, not

Re: [NFS] Updated patch for the [2.4.x] NFS 'missing directory entry a.k.a. IRIX server' problem...

2001-02-26 Thread Trond Myklebust
> " " == H J Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I much prefer to have a new getdents system call which will > also return d_type so that the 32 bit function in glibc can use > this new getdents instead of getdents64. That could also be done, however it seems odd to be adding a

Re: ISO-8859-1 completeness of kernel fonts?

2001-02-26 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:"Mack Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Hello, > > The 8x16 and Sun 12x22 kernel fonts I tried seem to lack some standard > glyphs necessary to represent the entire ISO-8859-1 charmap; I am talking > about all

Re: [NFS] Updated patch for the [2.4.x] NFS 'missing directory entry a.k.a. IRIX server' problem...

2001-02-26 Thread H . J . Lu
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 07:57:36AM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > " " == H J Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I don't know how it will work with real 64bit cookies on a > > 32bit host for NFS V3 since you truncate it into 32bit during > > sign extension. > > It won't

Re: [NFS] Updated patch for the [2.4.x] NFS 'missing directory entry a.k.a. IRIX server' problem...

2001-02-26 Thread Trond Myklebust
> " " == H J Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know how it will work with real 64bit cookies on a > 32bit host for NFS V3 since you truncate it into 32bit during > sign extension. It won't for the moment, but that's a problem with the readdir() API which uses the

[Announce] kdb v1.8 is available

2001-02-26 Thread Keith Owens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii http://oss.sgi.com/projects/kdb/download/ix86/ contains patches for kdb v1.8 against 2.4.2 and 2.4.2-ac5. The main reason for this release is to hook into the panic() routine and to sync with the NMI

Re: 2.2.18/ext2: special file corruption?

2001-02-26 Thread Ulrich Windl
On 26 Feb 2001, at 10:48, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Ulrich Windl writes: > > I had an interesting effect: Due to NVdriver I had a lot of system > > freezes, and I had to reboot. Using e2fsck 1.19a (SuSE 7.1) I got the > > message that one specific "Special (device/socket/fifo) inode .. has > >

ISO-8859-1 completeness of kernel fonts?

2001-02-26 Thread Mack Stevenson
Hello, The 8x16 and Sun 12x22 kernel fonts I tried seem to lack some standard glyphs necessary to represent the entire ISO-8859-1 charmap; I am talking about all accented capital vowels except for 'É'. This seems to happen in both 2.2.16 as well as in 2.2.18. Is this intentional? If so, why?

Re: timeout waiting for DMA

2001-02-26 Thread Daniela Engert
Hi Jason! On Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:41:04 -0500 (EST), Jason Rappleye wrote: >I'm running kernel 2.4.2 on an SGI 1100 (dual PIIIs) with a Serverworks >III LE based motherboard. The disk is a Seagate ST330630A. The disk has >DMA enabled at boot time : >hda: ST330630A, ATA DISK drive >hda: 59777640

Re: PROBLEM: Network hanging - Tulip driver with Netgear (Lite-On)

2001-02-26 Thread Pat Verner
Later, for what its worth: Up to now, I have only had one of the network cards active, and connected to the hub. I have just connected a second card to the hub, with an additional IP address. After running IPTRAF, it hung after about 5 minutes, after which BOTH network cards stopped

Re: PROBLEM: Network hanging - Tulip driver with Netgear (Lite-On)

2001-02-26 Thread Pat Verner
Good morning all. First thing this morning I applied Jeff's patch, as below. Started off well, ran for about 20 minutes (and 40 MBytes) before hanging. Reversed out Jeff's change and applied Manfred's patch to the same lines in pnic.c. Ran for about 15 minutes (28 Mbytes) before hanging.

[PATCH] starfire.c update for 2.2.19pre

2001-02-26 Thread Ion Badulescu
Hi Alan, This patch, against 2.2.19pre15, makes the compatibility functions static so they don't pollute the namespace, and marks some of them as __init. It has a few other small fixes from the 2.4 driver. Please apply. Thanks, Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a

Re: Linux 2.2.19pre15

2001-02-26 Thread Ion Badulescu
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001 23:18:37 + (GMT), Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2.2.19pre15 [...] > o EEpro100 posted writes fix (Ion Badulescu) All the credit goes to Andrey Savochkin and Don Becker -- I only applied their 2.4.1 patch to 2.2.x.. Thanks, Ion --

Everything working fine here.

2001-02-26 Thread safemode
As a departure from just about every other post talking about something wrong. I just want to say 2.2.19pre14 is working perfectly. I can't say anything about latency because i haven't found much in the area of timing patches for 2.2.19 yet, it is very responsive and fast and handles quite well

[PATCH] sealevel: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/sealevel.c Sun Aug 13 18:57:35 2000 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/sealevel.c Tue Feb 27 01:07:31 2001 @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ { /* Drop the CRC - its not a good idea to try and negotiate it ;) */

Re: [PATCH] dlci: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 09:56:13PM -0500, Jeff Garzik escreveu: > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/dlci.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 > > +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/dlci.c Mon Feb 26 23:43:25 2001 > > @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ > >

Re: Problem creating filesystem

2001-02-26 Thread Jeremy Jackson
Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote: > I have just purchased a new HD and I'm getting problems creating a > filesystem for it. I've done some research and some people claim the problem > might be kernel related so I'm asking here just in case. > > The HD is a Maxtor 80 Gb, plugged to the Promise

[PATCH] sbni: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c Tue Feb 27 00:19:32 2001 @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ * generate Ethernet address (0x00ff01xx) */ -

Re: CLOCAL and TIOCMIWAIT

2001-02-26 Thread Jeremy Jackson
Ivan Passos wrote: > Hello, > > A customer has just brought to my attention that when you try to use the > TIOCMIWAIT ioctl with our boards and CLOCAL is enabled, you can't check > changes in the DCD signal. He also mentioned that that is possible with > the regular serial ports. > > As I

Re: New net features for added performance

2001-02-26 Thread Jeremy Jackson
"David S. Miller" wrote: > Andi Kleen writes: > > Or did I misunderstand you? > > What is wrong with making methods, keyed off of the ethernet protocol > ID, that can do the "I know where/how-long headers are" stuff for that > protocol? Only cards with the problem call into this function

Re: [PATCH] dlci: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/dlci.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 > +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/dlci.c Mon Feb 26 23:43:25 2001 > @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ > skb_pull(skb, header); > netif_rx(skb); >

Re: [PATCH] cycx_x25: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/cycx_x25.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 > +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/cycx_x25.c Mon Feb 26 23:38:48 2001 > @@ -812,7 +812,6 @@ > if (bitm) > return; /* more data is coming */ > > -

[PATCH] hostess_sv11: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/hostess_sv11.c Sun Aug 13 18:57:35 2000 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/hostess_sv11.c Mon Feb 26 23:48:32 2001 @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ { /* Drop the CRC - its not a good idea to try and negotiate it

[PATCH] dlci: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/dlci.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/dlci.c Mon Feb 26 23:43:25 2001 @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ case FRAD_P_IP: header =

[PATCH] cycx_x25: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 09:58:31PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, Please apply. This one I maintain. 8) - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/cycx_x25.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/cycx_x25.c Mon Feb 26 23:38:48 2001 @@ -812,7

[PATCH] cosa: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/cosa.c Mon Feb 26 23:28:40 2001 @@ -738,14 +738,14 @@ chan->stats.rx_frame_errors++; return 0; } -

Re: 64GB option broken in 2.4.2

2001-02-26 Thread Rico Tudor
Problem is not fixed with your patch. Debugging packet is http://patrec.com./rico/vger/diag002.tar.bz2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread Craig Milo Rogers
>> a competing philosophy that said that the IP checksum must be >> recomputed incrementally at routers to catch hardware problems in the ... >ah.. we do recalculate IP Checksums now.. when we update any of the >timestamp rr options etc.. But, do you do it incrementally? By which I

[PATCH] comx-proto-lapb: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/comx-proto-lapb.c Sun Nov 12 01:02:39 2000 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/comx-proto-lapb.c Mon Feb 26 23:23:15 2001 @@ -306,11 +306,12 @@ p = skb_put(skb,1); *p = 0x01;

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread Michael Peddemors
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Benjamin C.R. LaHaise wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > > At gigapacket rates, it becomes an issue. This guy is talking about > > tinkering with new IP _options_, not just the header. So even if the > > IP header itself fits totally in a cache line, the

[PATCH] comx: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/wan/comx.c Thu Nov 16 20:08:25 2000 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/wan/comx.c Mon Feb 26 23:17:12 2001 @@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ } if (skb) { netif_rx(skb); + dev->last_rx

[PATCH] tms380tr: update last_rx after netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, Please consider applying. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/tokenring/tms380tr.cFri Feb 16 22:02:36 2001 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/tokenring/tms380tr.c Mon Feb 26 23:11:51 2001 @@ -2203,6 +2203,7 @@ skb_trim(skb,Length);

Re: [ANOMALIES]: 2.4.2 - __alloc_pages: failed - Causes more then just msgs

2001-02-26 Thread Shawn Starr
It may not be an important message but what does happen is /dev/dsp becomes hung and no sound works after the fault. So something is definately wrong. Shawn. Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > We can add an allocation flag (__GFP_NO_CRITICAL?) which can be

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread Michael Peddemors
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > > Also, I was looking into some RFC 1812 stuff. (Thanks for nothing Dave > > :) and was looking at 4.2.2.6 where it mentions that a router MUST > > implement the End of Option List option.. Havent' figured out where > > that is implememented

Re: [PATCH] 3c589_cs: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 09:07:49PM -0500, Jeff Garzik escreveu: > And here are the rest of the ones in pcmcia. Hey man, thats what I call cooperation 8) I was now on the netwave one, but had to stop to get another beer, when I came back... Jeff, go get a beer please, I'll pay you by March, 31,

2.4 kernels - "attempt to access beyond end of device"

2001-02-26 Thread Michal Jaegermann
I have right now on hands a system with PDC20265 controller, not used as "raid", and it gives me a hard time. It looks like that after some number of megabytes copied to a disk, where "number" seems to be somewhere between 100 and 150, something in a kernel internal structures get overwritten

Re: [PATCH] 3c589_cs: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
And here are the rest of the ones in pcmcia. -- Jeff Garzik | "You see, in this world there's two kinds of Building 1024 | people, my friend: Those with loaded guns MandrakeSoft | and those who dig. You dig." --Blondie Index: drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c

Re: 2.2.18: weird eepro100 msgs

2001-02-26 Thread Andrey Savochkin
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 07:14:09AM +, angelcode wrote: > I've been seeing the same kind of messages with an eepro100 > but they don't happen when the module is loaded. They > happen after it has been running for a few days. I am > running 2.4.1. I haven't seen any real problems but

Re: [PATCH] 3c589_cs: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:56:06PM -0500, Jeff Garzik escreveu: > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 > > +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c Mon Feb 26 22:44:00 2001 > > @@ -992,9 +992,9 @@ > >

Re: [PATCH] fmvj18x_cs: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:57:37PM -0500, Jeff Garzik escreveu: > Ditto... thanks, as I said to Donald, I was in fast mode, so the driver maintainers should take this into account and use my previous patches as a hint, I'm considering this for the upcoming patches, if there's any more drivers

Re: [PATCH] fmvj18x_cs: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Ditto... -- Jeff Garzik | "You see, in this world there's two kinds of Building 1024 | people, my friend: Those with loaded guns MandrakeSoft | and those who dig. You dig." --Blondie Index: drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c

Re: [PATCH] 3c589_cs: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 > +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c Mon Feb 26 22:44:00 2001 > @@ -992,9 +992,9 @@ > (pkt_len+3)>>2); > skb->protocol =

Re: PATCH] via-rhine.c: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:52:39PM -0500, Donald Becker escreveu: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of > > referencing skbs

Re: PATCH] via-rhine.c: don't reference skb after passing it tonetif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Donald Becker
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of > referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying > this patch. Ah,

[PATCH] fmvj18x_cs: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
another pcmcia one Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying this patch. Ah, this was just added to the

[PATCH] 3c589_cs: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
now to pcmcia ones Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying this patch. Ah, this was just added to the

PATCH] via-rhine.c: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
humm, almost finishing... 8) Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying this patch. Ah, this was just added to

Re: Problem creating filesystem

2001-02-26 Thread Guest section DW
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 06:48:16PM -0500, Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote: > I have just purchased a new HD and I'm getting problems creating a > filesystem for it. The HD is a Maxtor 80 Gb > > Disk /dev/hde: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 15871 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes > >

[PATCH] hp100.c: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
hey, its a flood! 8) Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying this patch. Ah, this was just added to the

Re: CLOCAL and TIOCMIWAIT

2001-02-26 Thread Paul Fulghum
> A customer has just brought to my attention that when you try to use the > TIOCMIWAIT ioctl with our boards and CLOCAL is enabled, you can't check > changes in the DCD signal. He also mentioned that that is possible with > the regular serial ports. > > As I understood, CLOCAL meant disabling

[PATCH] ewrk3.c: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
hey, look at this! 8) Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying this patch. Ah, this was just added to the

[PATCH] eth16i.c: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
yet another one. 8) Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying this patch. Ah, this was just added to the

Re: Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)

2001-02-26 Thread Andrew Morton
Vibol Hou wrote: > > > Are you still getting the "hordes" of Tx timeouts with the > > 3c905B which you reported a week ago? > > Yes, but they happen a few hours after the system starts up and continue > until the server is restarted. It seems like a separate issue. I haven't > tried taking

[PATCH] defxx.c: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
one more. Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying this patch. Ah, this was just added to the Janitor's TODO

[PATCH] de4x5.c: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx

2001-02-26 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hi, I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying this patch. Ah, this was just added to the Janitor's TODO list at http://bazar.conectiva.com.br/~acme/TODO and I'm doing a quick audit in the net

Linux 2.4.2 DMA Interrupt poblem?

2001-02-26 Thread Jasmeet Sidhu
Hi, I have a linux raid 5 running with primise ultra dma ata/100 cards running IBM ata/100 drives with the proper cables. A lot of people have been submitting reports that have the similar error in the syslog. I myself have two identical systems running that are giving a lot of errors, this

RE: Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)

2001-02-26 Thread Vibol Hou
> Are you still getting the "hordes" of Tx timeouts with the > 3c905B which you reported a week ago? Yes, but they happen a few hours after the system starts up and continue until the server is restarted. It seems like a separate issue. I haven't tried taking down the interface and putting it

Re: RFC: vmalloc improvements

2001-02-26 Thread David S. Miller
Reto Baettig writes: > The RPC server needs lots of 2MB receive buffers which are > allocated using vmalloc because the NIC has its own pagetables. Why not just allocate the page seperately and keep track of where they are, since the NIC has all the page tabling facilities on it's end, the

SOLVED: Re: (Random?) File System Corruption

2001-02-26 Thread Joshua J. Kugler
Well, don't I feel silly. I some more investigating, and found that my problem didn't have anything to do with the kernel after all. I, uh, found that I had a couple partitions over lapping. Anyway, sorry to bother you all, and now I'm going to go find some white powder to lessen the

CLOCAL and TIOCMIWAIT

2001-02-26 Thread Ivan Passos
Hello, A customer has just brought to my attention that when you try to use the TIOCMIWAIT ioctl with our boards and CLOCAL is enabled, you can't check changes in the DCD signal. He also mentioned that that is possible with the regular serial ports. As I understood, CLOCAL meant disabling DCD

Re: [PATCH] partitions/ibm.c

2001-02-26 Thread Andries . Brouwer
> your arguments appear correct to me > I include the patch to be applied from my point of view Good. Had no time today to look at the details, but at first sight this is a big improvement. May want to nitpick a little some other time. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: RFC: vmalloc improvements

2001-02-26 Thread Reto Baettig
Ingo Molnar wrote: > question: what is this application, and why does it need so much virtual > memory? vmalloc()-able memory is maximized to 128 MB right now, and > increasing it conflicts with directly mapping RAM, so generally it's a > good idea to avoid vmalloc() as much as possible. We

CPU name for "pure" i386 missing

2001-02-26 Thread Cesar Eduardo Barros
Looks like every time the CPU detection code is rewritten, the printing of the CPU name for "pure" (i.e. "original") 386s suffer. Last time, the "\n" after the "CPU: 386" line was missing. This time it's worse. It's tripping the "unknown CPU" code path: CPU: Before vendor init, caps:

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread Michael Peddemors
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Craig Milo Rogers wrote: > > > I have a whole 40 bytes (+/-) to share... Now although I don't see > > > anything explicitly prohibiting the use of unused IP Header option .. > > > in between.. Has anyone seen any RFC that explicitly says I MUST NOT? > > > >Not to my

Re: Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)

2001-02-26 Thread Andrew Morton
Vibol Hou wrote: > > I've reported this problem a long while ago, but no one answered my pleas. > To tell you the honest truth, I don't know where to begin looking. It's > difficult to poke around when the serial console is unresponsive :/ > Sounds like a network driver problem. Are you

clarification 2.4.2-ac5: trident.c

2001-02-26 Thread Frank Davis
Hello, When I stated: 'off the root directory', I meant the root kernel directory: /usr/src/linux , not / Regards, Frank - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstances (Re: netdev issues (3c905B))

2001-02-26 Thread David S. Miller
Simon Kirby writes: > Has such a patch gone in to the kernel yet? Yep, it is in both the zerocopy and AC patches. (Linus is away at the moment) Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)

2001-02-26 Thread Vibol Hou
I've reported this problem a long while ago, but no one answered my pleas. To tell you the honest truth, I don't know where to begin looking. It's difficult to poke around when the serial console is unresponsive :/ When I was running 2.4.0, the system, a dual-processor webserver, would

2.4.2-ac5: trident.c

2001-02-26 Thread Frank Davis
Hello, In patch-2.4.2-ac5 , a trident.c is created off the root directory. Was that supposed to be a merge with drivers/sound/trident.c ? There is a separate patch on drivers/sound/trident.c in 2.4.2-ac5. The one I'm referring to is located last in the patch. Regards, Frank - To

Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstances (Re: netdev issues (3c905B))

2001-02-26 Thread Simon Kirby
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 03:52:37PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > There is no reason my patch should have this effect. > > All of this is what appears to be a bug in Windows TCP header > compression, if the ID field of the IPv4 header does not change then > it drops every other packet. > >

Re: [PATCH] philips rush usb support

2001-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 07:24:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Userspace stuff should be found at http://openrush.sourceforge.net > > > if you have a rush. It works for me on ia32 with the model sa125. > > > > Why can't the entire driver be in userspace? It appears it uses a > > completely

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > At gigapacket rates, it becomes an issue. This guy is talking about > tinkering with new IP _options_, not just the header. So even if the > IP header itself fits totally in a cache line, the options afterwardsd > likely will not and thus require

Re: New net features for added performance

2001-02-26 Thread David S. Miller
Jeff Garzik writes: > I only want to know if more are coming, not actually pass multiples.. Ok, then my only concern is that the path from "I know more is coming" down to hard_start_xmit invocation is long. It would mean passing a new piece of state a long distance inside the stack from SKB

Re: New net features for added performance

2001-02-26 Thread David S. Miller
Andi Kleen writes: > Or did I misunderstand you? What is wrong with making methods, keyed off of the ethernet protocol ID, that can do the "I know where/how-long headers are" stuff for that protocol? Only cards with the problem call into this function vector or however we arrange it, and then

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread David S. Miller
Benjamin C.R. LaHaise writes: > Since the ip header fits in the cache of some CPUs (like the P4), > this becoming a cheaper operation than ever before. At gigapacket rates, it becomes an issue. This guy is talking about tinkering with new IP _options_, not just the header. So even if the IP

Massive Corruption

2001-02-26 Thread MC_Vai
Hi, I have a problem with my filesystem, the kernel panics as soon as it tries to mount the root filesystem. I guess it is because of the IDE bug in the driver Russell found, but he (Russell) suggest me to post my message here. What I've

Re: New net features for added performance

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
"David S. Miller" wrote: > Jeff Garzik writes: > > 2) Tx packet grouping. > ... > > Disadvantages? > > See Torvalds vs. world discussion on this list about API entry points > which pass multiple pages at a time versus simpler ones which pass > only a single page at a time. :-) I only want to

Re: tcp stalls with 2.4 (but not 2.2)

2001-02-26 Thread Brian Grossman
> > I'm seeing stalls sending packets to some clients. I see this problem > > under 2.4 (2.4.1 and 2.4.1ac17) but not under 2.2.17. > > compiled in ECN support? SYNcookies? try disabling through /proc > tcp or udp? if udp check /proc/net/ipv4/ip_udpdloose or such CONFIG_INET_ECN is not set

Re: New net features for added performance

2001-02-26 Thread Andi Kleen
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 03:48:31PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > Andi Kleen writes: > > 4) Better support for aligned RX by only copying the header > > Andi you can make this now: > > 1) Add new "post-header data pointer" field in SKB. That would imply to let the drivers parse all

Re: Linux 2.4.1 network (socket) performance

2001-02-26 Thread David S. Miller
Richard B. Johnson writes: > > unix socket sends eat into memory reserved for atomic allocs. OK (Manfred is being quoted here, to be clear). I'm still talking with Alexey about how to fix this, I might just prefer killing this fallback mechanism of skb_alloc_send_skb then make AF_UNIX act

Re: New net features for added performance

2001-02-26 Thread David S. Miller
Andi Kleen writes: > 4) Better support for aligned RX by only copying the header Andi you can make this now: 1) Add new "post-header data pointer" field in SKB. 2) Change drivers to copy into aligned headroom as you mention, and they set this new post-header pointer as appropriate. For

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > Not to my knowledge. Routers already change the time to live field, > so I see no reason why they can't do smart things with special IP > options either (besides efficiency concerns :-). A number of ISPs patch the MSS value to 1492 due to the

Re: New net features for added performance

2001-02-26 Thread David S. Miller
Jeff Garzik writes: > 1) Rx Skb recycling. ... > Advantages: A de-allocation immediately followed by a reallocation is > eliminated, less L1 cache pollution during interrupt handling. > Potentially less DMA traffic between card and host. ... > Disadvantages? It simply cannot work, as

Problem creating filesystem

2001-02-26 Thread Carlos Fernandez Sanz
I have just purchased a new HD and I'm getting problems creating a filesystem for it. I've done some research and some people claim the problem might be kernel related so I'm asking here just in case. The HD is a Maxtor 80 Gb, plugged to the Promise controller that comes with Asus A7V

2.2.19pre15: drivers/net/Config.in: 359: bad if condition

2001-02-26 Thread Craig Milo Rogers
After building a patched source tree, and running "make xmenu" on a RH6.2 system with most relevant RPMs installed, I see: drivers/net/Config.in: 359: bad if condition The following line: if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = y -a "$CONFIG_WAN_ROUTER" != "n" ]; then should be: if [

Re: [patch] highmem-2.4.2-A0

2001-02-26 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 09:44:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > -ac4. Differences: no need to complicate highmem.c with pool-fillup on > bootup. It will get refilled after the first disk-accesses anyway. I considered that, in practice it isn't going to make any difference, I _totally_ agree. But

Re: [NFS] Updated patch for the [2.4.x] NFS 'missing directory entry a.k.a. IRIX server' problem...

2001-02-26 Thread H . J . Lu
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:48:50PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > Hi, > > After having tried to thrash out what exactly is the kernel > interface for telldir/seekdir w.r.t. the existence of negative offsets > with the glibc people, I've finally found a way to work within the > current

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread David S. Miller
Michael Peddemors writes: > A few things.. why is ip.h not part of the linux/include/net rather than > linux/include/linux hierachy? Exported to older userlands... > Defined items that are not used anywhere in the source.. > Can any of them be deleted now? > So what, userland makes use

Announcing Journaled File System (JFS) release 0.1.6

2001-02-26 Thread Steve Best
The latest drop of JFS was made available today. The file system has fixes included. The log manager no longer uses the page cache for log pages, this eliminates dead-locks that were occurring in the log manager. The file system has general work done to remove SMP dead-lock problems. fsck now

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread Andi Kleen
Michael Peddemors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A few things.. why is ip.h not part of the linux/include/net rather than > linux/include/linux hierachy? Because it needs to be user visible for raw sockets (linux is exported to the user, net isn't) > Defined items that are not used anywhere

Linux 2.2.19pre15

2001-02-26 Thread Alan Cox
2.2.19pre15 o Hugh Blemings has moved (Hugh Blemings) o Add support for usb hubs with many ports(Randy Dunlap) o Reapply make xconfig isdn fix (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz) o Fix the tcp problems(Alexey

Linux 2.4.2ac5

2001-02-26 Thread Alan Cox
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ 2.4.2-ac5 o Add Epson 1240U scanners to usb scanner (Joel Becker) o Fix eth= compatibility (Andrew Morton) | Should fix 3c509 problems for one o Add Pnp table to opl3sa2

Re: [PATCH] Re: reiserfs: still problems with tail conversion

2001-02-26 Thread Ken Moffat
Chris, it works nicely here (i586, 32Mb, Red Hat's gcc-2.96-69). Thanks. Ken On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Chris Mason wrote: > > Hi guys, > > This patch should take care of the other cause for null bytes > in small files. It has been through a few hours of testing, > with some of the usual load

Re: Announce: modutils 2.4.3 is available

2001-02-26 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:08:59 +0100, Stefan Smietanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Keith Owens wrote >> modutils-2.4.3.tar.gz Source tarball, includes RPM spec file > >IIRC 2.4.2 was 2.4 only, and was released under protest, is it the same >for 2.4.3? modutils 2.4 will work on kernel

Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff

2001-02-26 Thread Michael Peddemors
While doing some work on some ip options stuff, I have noticed a bunchof unused entries in linux/include/linux/ip.h A few things.. why is ip.h not part of the linux/include/net rather than linux/include/linux hierachy? Defined items that are not used anywhere in the source.. Can any of them

Re: Posible bug in gcc

2001-02-26 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 02.26 David wrote: > I hope you will find this information usefull. > > I am not in the linux-kernel list so, if posible, I would like to be > personally CC'ed the answers/comments sent to the list in response to > this posting. > > I think I heve found a bug in gcc. I have tried both egcs

linux 2.2.19pre14 is marked as pre13, plus some config/other problems.(fwd)

2001-02-26 Thread M Sweger
Alan, See below for a list of problems with the linux 2.2.19pre14 patch. The errors should be apparent. I have a Dell optiplex 333mhz Intel with a 9gig SCSI card. A). The version of the linux 2.2.19pre14 on 2.2.18 is compiling and saying it is pre13. Thus the make

linux 2.2.19pre14 SCSI v5.1.33 patch AIC7895 comments.

2001-02-26 Thread M Sweger
Hello Doug, Just to let you know that I've upgraded from linux 2.2.19pre5 to linux 2.2.19pre14 and here is an updated status. 1). My machine is a Dell optiplex 333mhz Intel with a 2940U2W AIC-7895 chipset and SCSI BIOS v1.33S2 (where S means special Dell stuff) 2). This newer patch

2.2.18: difficulties with Ensoniq 5880 (es1371) rev 0x03?

2001-02-26 Thread Matthias Andree
I already asked this on the linux-sound mailing list almost 10 days ago, but got no response. So here it is again, header cut down to essentials: - Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:04:32 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2.2.18: difficulties with

Re: apic patches (with MIS counter)

2001-02-26 Thread Roeland Th. Jansen
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:14:11PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > It is already present in 2.4.2-ac3. Yep, I just noticed it. there was a backlog from here to tokyo. > There is a small performance impact at every interrupt -- the code that > checks for mismatches incurs it. It's just a

  1   2   3   4   >