Re: Fwd: [PATCH] IRTOUCHSYSTEMS support for usbtouchscreen

2007-07-02 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Monday 02 July 2007 18:02, Daniel Ritz wrote: > looks good. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied to my tree, thank you. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info

Re: Add INPUT support to toshiba_acpi

2007-07-02 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Renato S. Yamane wrote: > Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > Richard Hughes wrote: > >> Yes, although this is out of my area or expertise, sorry. > > > > I've looked a bit but can't find any driver interaction of those > > programs. Any further ideas welcome. > > Do you try omnibook driver? > svn export

Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

2007-07-02 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 05:29 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Suspend to RAM on a machine with / on a fuse filesystem turns out to be > a screaming nightmare - either the suspend fails because syslog (for > instance) can't be frozen, or the machine deadlocks for some other > reason I haven't

Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

2007-07-02 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Note, though, that this won't help at all when people use the "suspend-to-ram > instead of powering down after writing a hibernation image" feature in > (uswsusp | tuxonice). Fuse is just a broken idea in the first place, but > given that it exists, we still need to find the underlying

Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

2007-07-02 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 05:29 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Suspend to RAM on a machine with / on a fuse filesystem turns out to be > a screaming nightmare - either the suspend fails because syslog (for > instance) can't be frozen, or the machine deadlocks for some other > reason I haven't

Re: Fix empty macros in acpi.

2007-07-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:22:47AM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > whelp, it seems that the reason for this patch is this: > > #define DBG() > > if(...) > DBG(); > next_c_statement > > which turns into > if(...) ; > next_c_statement > > But since there is an intervening ';', this

Re: how do versioning filesystems take snapshot of opened files?

2007-07-02 Thread Xin Zhao
I do know how copy-on-write works. But this seems insufficient to address the problem I asked. One possible way is to modify the filesystem so that when a file is opened for write, we always keep a copy of the file's metadata and a CoW bitmap. For subsequent writes, we first copy the old data to

Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Prevent frozen user mode helpers from failing the freezing of tasks (rev. 2)

2007-07-02 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 10:48 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > The problem, as far as I understand it, is that the instructions can > get > > reordered if there are no barriers in there. > > Are you sure? I thought atomic variables have barrirers built-in. bzzzt. they don't. Ben. - To

Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Prevent frozen user mode helpers from failing the freezing of tasks (rev. 2)

2007-07-02 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE: > > > case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE: > > > usermodehelper_disabled = 1; > > > - return NOTIFY_OK; > > > + smp_mb(); > > > > usermodehelper_disabled should be atomic

Re: blink driver power saving

2007-07-02 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Monday 02 July 2007 19:08, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2007-07-02 14:39:27, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps one of you geniuses who all hate it can find a better way to > > > > solve the "video output dead after kexec; but need visual feedback to > > > > the user > > > > while crash

Re: [PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with kmalloc_node

2007-07-02 Thread Yinghai Lu
On 7/2/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:36:37PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > [PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with kmalloc_node > > For amd64 based two way system. USB always on node0. but dma buffer for urb > allocated via kmalloc always get ram

Re: [PATCH 2/3] make cancel_xxx_work_sync() return a boolean

2007-07-02 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:10PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Change cancel_work_sync() and cancel_delayed_work_sync() to return a boolean > indicating whether the work was actually cancelled. A zero return value means > that the work was not pending/queued. > > Without that kind of change it

how do versioning filesystems take snapshot of opened files?

2007-07-02 Thread Xin Zhao
Hi, If a file is already opened when snapshot command is issued, the file itself could be in an inconsistent state already. Before the file is closed, maybe part of the file contains old data, the rest contains new data. How does a versioning filesystem guarantee that the file snapshot is in a

Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

2007-07-02 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi. On Tuesday 03 July 2007 15:21:30 Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 02:54:41PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > Note, though, that this won't help at all when people use the "suspend-to-ram > > instead of powering down after writing a hibernation image" feature in > >

Re: Fix empty macros in acpi.

2007-07-02 Thread Len Brown
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 20:26, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 08:21:15PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:00:29AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:33:09PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > +#define DBG(x...) do { } while(0) > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node

2007-07-02 Thread Roland Dreier
> [PATCH 4/4] usb: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node If you're fixing things up, change "use use" to "use" while you're at it... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

2007-07-02 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 02:54:41PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Note, though, that this won't help at all when people use the "suspend-to-ram > instead of powering down after writing a hibernation image" feature in > (uswsusp | tuxonice). Fuse is just a broken idea in the first place, but

Re: [PATCH 1/3] rename cancel_rearming_delayed_work() to cancel_delayed_work_sync()

2007-07-02 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:36:29PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Imho, the current naming of cancel_xxx workqueue functions is very confusing. > > cancel_delayed_work() > cancel_rearming_delayed_work() > cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() // obsolete > >

Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node

2007-07-02 Thread Yinghai Lu
On 7/2/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:37:13PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > [PATCH 4/4] net: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node Um, your subject doesn't match the patch below. You might want to verify it again... it should be [PATCH 4/4] usb: add

Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node

2007-07-02 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:37:13PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > [PATCH 4/4] net: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node Um, your subject doesn't match the patch below. You might want to verify it again... I'll not apply any of these until the subject gets straightened out from the body of

Re: [PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with kmalloc_node

2007-07-02 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:36:37PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > [PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with kmalloc_node > > For amd64 based two way system. USB always on node0. but dma buffer for urb > allocated via kmalloc always get ram on node1. So change to kmalloc_node to > get

Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

2007-07-02 Thread Nigel Cunningham
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 14:29:18 Matthew Garrett wrote: > Suspend to RAM on a machine with / on a fuse filesystem turns out to be > a screaming nightmare - either the suspend fails because syslog (for > instance) can't be frozen, or the machine deadlocks for some other > reason I haven't

Re: [PATCH 10/12] add module parameter for users who need more outstanding I/O

2007-07-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:50:12 -0400 "Ed L. Cashin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Add module parameter for users who need more outstanding I/O. > why? I assume that there is some performance benefit to permitting some more outstanding IO, but that's just a wild guess. Assuming that the guess is

Re: [PATCH 07/12] use a dynamic pool of sk_buffs to keep up with fast targets

2007-07-02 Thread David Miller
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:36:36 -0700 > My initial thought is that if there is a legitimate need for this > new capability then it should be made available to other parts of > the kernel rather than being private to the AEO driver. Absolutely. We even used

Re: [PATCH 09/12] remove race between use and initialization of locks

2007-07-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:50:12 -0400 "Ed L. Cashin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This change was originally submitted by Alexey Dobriyan in an email > with ... > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and the comment, > > Some drivers do register_chrdev() before lock or semaphore used in >

Re: [PATCH 08/12] only schedule work once

2007-07-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:50:12 -0400 "Ed L. Cashin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only schedule work once. why? > Signed-off-by: Ed L. Cashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c |2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Re: [PATCH 07/12] use a dynamic pool of sk_buffs to keep up with fast targets

2007-07-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:50:11 -0400 "Ed L. Cashin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Use a dynamic pool of sk_buffs to keep up with fast targets. That's far too skimpy a description of what this patch is doing, what it is for, what makes AOE need this functionality, etc. My initial thought is that if

Re: [PATCH 02/12] handle multiple network paths to AoE device

2007-07-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:50:10 -0400 "Ed L. Cashin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Handle multiple network paths to AoE device. > > ... > > > struct buf *inprocess; /* the one we're currently working on */ > - ushort lostjumbo; > - ushort nframes; /* number of frames below */

[PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

2007-07-02 Thread Matthew Garrett
Suspend to RAM on a machine with / on a fuse filesystem turns out to be a screaming nightmare - either the suspend fails because syslog (for instance) can't be frozen, or the machine deadlocks for some other reason I haven't tracked down. We could "fix" fuse, or alternatively we could do what

[PATCH for 2.6.22] ACPI: fix acpi_osi=!Linux

2007-07-02 Thread Len Brown
Need to check for special case "acpi_osi=!Linux" before general case "acpi_osi=!*", or it will have no effect. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c index 58ceb18..2e7ba61 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c @@

Re: [PATCH] Teach do_mpage_readpage() about unwritten buffers

2007-07-02 Thread David Chinner
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:28:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:10:19 +1000 David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems sane, although one does wonder whether it's a worthy tradeoff. We > add additional overhead to readpage[s]() just to avoid some IO during >

[GIT PULL] please pull infiniband.git

2007-07-02 Thread Roland Dreier
Linus, please pull from master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus This will get a fix for a crash in IPoIB and new

Re: [PATCH] Teach do_mpage_readpage() about unwritten buffers

2007-07-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:10:19 +1000 David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Teach do_mpage_readpage() about unwritten extents so we can > always map them in get_blocks rather than they are are holes on > read. Allows setup_swap_extents() to use preallocated files on XFS > filesystems for swap

Re: [patch 3/5] remove ptep_test_and_clear_dirty and ptep_clear_flush_dirty.

2007-07-02 Thread Zachary Amsden
Martin Schwidefsky wrote: From: Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nobody is using ptep_test_and_clear_dirty and ptep_clear_flush_dirty. Remove the functions from all architectures. -static inline int -ptep_test_and_clear_dirty (struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t

Re: Suspend2 is getting a new name.

2007-07-02 Thread Mail List
On Monday 02 July 2007 03:11:52 pm Fabio Comolli wrote: > > > Am I the only person on this list thinking that a plain "hibernate" > > > will be a much better choice? > > > > No you are not the only one :) I like the frozen name - but similar to you, if the name suspendX and hibernate are

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-07-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:06:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > @@ -65,1 +60,1 @@ > > > - depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI || > > X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI > > > + depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI > > > --- > >

[PATCH] Teach do_mpage_readpage() about unwritten buffers

2007-07-02 Thread David Chinner
Teach do_mpage_readpage() about unwritten extents so we can always map them in get_blocks rather than they are are holes on read. Allows setup_swap_extents() to use preallocated files on XFS filesystems for swap files without ever needing to convert them. Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <[EMAIL

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-07-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:36:48PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:43:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Applying '[CPUFREQ] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI' > > > > > > error: patch failed: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig:65 > > > error:

Re: [patch 3/3] Fix XFS_IOC_FSBULKSTAT{,_SINGLE} and XFS_IOC_FSINUMBERS in compat mode (try3)

2007-07-02 Thread David Chinner
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:05:09PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:40:34AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > David Chinner wrote: > > > I think we can remove xfs_bulkstat_one_compat() completely by using > > > the same method you used with the xfs_inumber_fmt functions. > > >

Re: vm/fs meetup in september?

2007-07-02 Thread Jared Hulbert
On 7/2/07, Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 2 July 2007 10:44:00 -0700, Jared Hulbert wrote: > > >So what you mean is "swap on flash" ? Defintively sounds like an > >interesting topic, although I'm not too sure it's all that > >filesystem-related. > > Maybe not. Yet, it would be a

Re: idr_get_new_above() limitation?

2007-07-02 Thread Jim Houston
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 19:19 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote: > i=3fff token=3fff t=3fff > i=4000 token=4000 t= > Invalid object . Expected 4000 > > That means token 0x4000 seems to be the "upper boundary" of idr_find(). > However

Re: [PATCH] Blackfin arch: include/asm-blackfin/macros.h die die die

2007-07-02 Thread Bryan Wu
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 17:09 +0200, Marco Roeland wrote: > This file accidentally got truncated instead of deleted in commit df30b11. > Doing a "make distclean" or "make mrproper" deletes this file because of > its zero size. Git then sees this as an uncommitted local change. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-07-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:43:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Applying '[CPUFREQ] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI' > > > > error: patch failed: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig:65 > > error: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig: patch does not apply > > I made the

[GIT PULL] Blackfin arch fixes (try #2)

2007-07-02 Thread Bryan Wu
Hi Linus: Marco's patch will kill the zero file git-pull error. Jie's patch is required because we will release our new Blackfin toolchain. Please pull from "master" branch of: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git/ master Jie Zhang (1): Blackfin arch:

Re: [patch 0/6] sys_indirect RFC - sys_indirect introduction

2007-07-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > But there are > > examples (and the signal stuff is one of them), where you do need the > > set_context+syscall+unset_context abstraction, for all cases where the > > kernel already has its own internal data strctures. In those cases you'd > > have to

Re: [-mm patch] fix duplicate CONFIG_DMAR Makefile line

2007-07-02 Thread Keshavamurthy, Anil S
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:22:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 03:43:21AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >... > > Changes since 2.6.22-rc4-mm2: > >... > > +intel-iommu-intel-iommu-driver.patch > >... > > Intel IOMMU support > >... > > > Contrary to popular belief, two

Re: ppdev - libieee1284.so conflicts with 2.6.21

2007-07-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 04:12:20PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > and if that doesn't help, please try this: > > boot with kernel boot options: > noisapnp pnpacpi=off > > since we have also seen a couple of cases that look like ACPI + PNP > are mucking up parallel port printers, so maybe they also

Re: [patch 0/6] sys_indirect RFC - sys_indirect introduction

2007-07-02 Thread Ulrich Drepper
On 7/2/07, Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Never be usable? I made you a concrete example that is like 8 months old. And *that* could not have been cleanly handled with the flat structure idea. First of all, sigmasks are not widely needed. Second, why on earth shouldn't it be

Re: why does git perpetually complain about include/asm-blackfin/macros.h?

2007-07-02 Thread Bryan Wu
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 16:24 +0200, Marco Roeland wrote: > On Monday July 2nd 2007 at 15:58 Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > [obnoxious zero sized file include/asm-blackfin/macros.h that gets > > zapped by toolchains and resurrected again by git] > > > > I've seen that as well, but in my case doing a > >

Re: Old bug in tg3 driver unfixed?

2007-07-02 Thread Björn Steinbrink
On 2007.06.30 14:06:14 +0200, Tim Boneko wrote: > Hello! > I am not subscribed to this list so please CC answers to my mail > address. THX! > > I recently replaced the mainboard of one of my servers with a Tyan > Tomcat K8E. The onboard gigabit NIC is a Broadcom BCM5721. After > compiling and

Re: [patch 0/4] MAP_NOZERO v2 - VM_NOZERO/MAP_NOZERO early summer madness

2007-07-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Rik van Riel wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > > > > On 7/2/07, Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That should not happen. The default SELinux configuration > > > > in Fedora (and Debian?) runs a few daemons in

[2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-07-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:22:55PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Hi Adrian, Hi Dave, > > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-07-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Hi Adrian, > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL

Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1

2007-07-02 Thread Paul Mackerras
Jason Wessel writes: > I suppose the argument could be made to remove the check in the compiled > file, but it does serve as a way to protect kgdb for now if someone > tries to hard compile in xmon and kgdb. Completely unpredictable > results will occur with the debugger unless some pieces

Re: blink driver power saving

2007-07-02 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > The patch makes sense. You don't need to poll every jiffie to find > > out if system has panic. > > The blink driver doesn't run on panic (or at least not on panic on > the same kernel). It runs always. It was designed to do the blinking > while the kdump kernel runs and writes the dump.

Re: ppdev - libieee1284.so conflicts with 2.6.21

2007-07-02 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 07/02/2007 06:47 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:22:09 +0200 > Juan Antonio Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've reported this error to Fedora Bugzilla: >> >> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246406 >> >> In sort: to use libieee1284 I need to

Re: vm/fs meetup in september?

2007-07-02 Thread Jörn Engel
On Mon, 2 July 2007 10:44:00 -0700, Jared Hulbert wrote: > > >So what you mean is "swap on flash" ? Defintively sounds like an > >interesting topic, although I'm not too sure it's all that > >filesystem-related. > > Maybe not. Yet, it would be a very useful place to store data from a > file as

Re: ppdev - libieee1284.so conflicts with 2.6.21

2007-07-02 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:47:53 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:22:09 +0200 > Juan Antonio Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've reported this error to Fedora Bugzilla: > > > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246406 > > > > In sort: to use

[PATCH] sata_promise: SATA hotplug support, take 2

2007-07-02 Thread Mikael Pettersson
This patch enables hotplugging of SATA devices in the sata_promise driver. It's been tested successfully on both first- and second-generation Promise SATA chips: SATA150 TX2plus, SATAII150 TX2plus, SATAII150 TX4, SATA300 TX2plus, and SATA300 TX4. The only quirk I've seen is that hotplugging

Re: blink driver power saving

2007-07-02 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2007-07-02 14:39:27, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > Perhaps one of you geniuses who all hate it can find a better way to > > > solve the "video output dead after kexec; but need visual feedback to the > > > user > > > while crash dumping" problem. I'm waiting for your patches. > > > > > > > I

Re: NIKON D50 problem

2007-07-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:17:20 +0300 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! Recently I've found out that my camera NIKON D50 can't mount any more. > uname -a: "Linux niam 2.6.22-rc6-cfs-v18 #6 Mon Jul 2 20:19:25 EEST > 2007 i686 Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz GenuineIntel >

Re: idr_get_new_above() limitation?

2007-07-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:19:26 +0200 Hoang-Nam Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For ehca device driver we're intending to utilize > idr_get_new_above() and have written a test case, which I'm attaching > at the end. Basically it tries to get an idr token above a lower boundary > by calling

Re: [patch 0/4] MAP_NOZERO v2 - VM_NOZERO/MAP_NOZERO early summer madness

2007-07-02 Thread Rik van Riel
Davide Libenzi wrote: On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote: On 7/2/07, Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That should not happen. The default SELinux configuration in Fedora (and Debian?) runs a few daemons in their own restricted modes and has most of the system running in

Re: ppdev - libieee1284.so conflicts with 2.6.21

2007-07-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:22:09 +0200 Juan Antonio Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've reported this error to Fedora Bugzilla: > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246406 > > In sort: to use libieee1284 I need to disable ppdev usage with > kernel 2.6.21. Kernel 2.6.20

Re: [patch 0/4] MAP_NOZERO v2 - VM_NOZERO/MAP_NOZERO early summer madness

2007-07-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On 7/2/07, Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That should not happen. The default SELinux configuration > > in Fedora (and Debian?) runs a few daemons in their own > > restricted modes and has most of the system running in > > unconfined_t,

Re: [patch 0/4] MAP_NOZERO v2 - VM_NOZERO/MAP_NOZERO early summer madness

2007-07-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Andy Isaacson wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:03:07PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > I think the focus should be to find a case where under the currently > > implemented policy for MAP_NOZERO, MAP_NOZERO represent a loss of security > > WRT no MAP_NOZERO. I have not

Re: [patch 0/6] sys_indirect RFC - sys_indirect introduction

2007-07-02 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On 7/1/07, Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With the current API design you'd able to easily confine the "pre" code > > inside the "set" function, and the "post" code inside the "unset" > > function. It looks pretty clean to me, and allows

[PATCH 1/4] usb: make the usb_device numa_node to get assigned from controller

2007-07-02 Thread Yinghai Lu
[PATCH 1/4] usb: make the usb_device numa_node to get assigned from controller So we can use dev_to_node(_dev->dev) later in kmalloc_node to dma buffer Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/usb.c b/drivers/usb/core/usb.c index 4a6299b..c611b3c 100644 ---

[PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with kmalloc_node

2007-07-02 Thread Yinghai Lu
[PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with kmalloc_node For amd64 based two way system. USB always on node0. but dma buffer for urb allocated via kmalloc always get ram on node1. So change to kmalloc_node to get dma_buffer on corresponding node Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL

[PATCH 2/4] dma: make dma pool to use kmalloc_node

2007-07-02 Thread Yinghai Lu
[PATCH 2/4] dma: make dma pool to use kmalloc_node Using dev_to_node(>dev) to get node, and kmalloc_node to dma buffer on corresding node dma pool Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/drivers/base/dmapool.c b/drivers/base/dmapool.c index 91970e9..7647abf 100644 ---

[PATCH 4/4] net: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node

2007-07-02 Thread Yinghai Lu
[PATCH 4/4] net: add usb_alloc_urb_node to use use kmalloc_node For amd64 based two way system. USB always on node0. but urb allocated via kmalloc always get ram on node1. So change to kmalloc_node to get urb on corresponding node Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git

Re: [PATCH] i386 - Fix regression, endless loop in ptrace singlestep over an int80

2007-07-02 Thread Jason Wessel
Chuck Ebbert wrote: On 07/02/2007 04:53 PM, Jason Wessel wrote: Attached is a patch with a complete test case to fix the regression introduced by the commit: 635cf99a80f4ebee59d70eb64bb85ce829e4591f. This patch is against kernel 2.6.21 but the fix is applicable to 2.6.21 and up. Prior to

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-07-02 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:13:29 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:54:01AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >... > > maximilian attems (1): > > starfire list alpha as 64 bit arch > >... > > --- a/drivers/net/starfire.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/starfire.c > > @@

[git patch] fix the libata fix

2007-07-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
(this pulls everything in 'upstream-linus', too) Please pull from the 'upstream-linus2' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus2 to receive the previously sent changes, and in addition, the following fix: commit

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-07-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:54:01AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >... > maximilian attems (1): > starfire list alpha as 64 bit arch >... > --- a/drivers/net/starfire.c > +++ b/drivers/net/starfire.c > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static int full_duplex[MAX_UNITS] = {0, }; > * This SUCKS. > * We need

Re: Suspend2 is getting a new name.

2007-07-02 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi. On Tuesday 03 July 2007 05:18:39 Bill Davidsen wrote: > Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > Suspend2's name is changing to "TuxOnIce". > > > > This is for a couple of reasons: > > > > In recent discussions on LKML, the point was made that the word "Suspend" is > > confusing. It

Re: [PATCH 1/1] file caps: update selinux xattr hooks

2007-07-02 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 13:22 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > This fixes a shortcoming of the cap_setfcap patch I sent earlier, > > pointed out by Stephen Smalley. > > > > Seems to compile and boot on my little systems. > > > > thanks, > > -serge >

Fwd: [PATCH] IRTOUCHSYSTEMS support for usbtouchscreen

2007-07-02 Thread Daniel Ritz
looks good. Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- forwarded message --- Hello, this patch adds support for IRTOUCHSYSTEMS (or UNITOP) infrared touchscreens. The manufacturer (http://www.irtouch.com) provides only closed source drivers for specific kernel versions (looks like GPL

Re: [PATCH] i386 - Fix regression, endless loop in ptrace singlestep over an int80

2007-07-02 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 07/02/2007 04:53 PM, Jason Wessel wrote: > > Attached is a patch with a complete test case to fix the regression > introduced by the commit: 635cf99a80f4ebee59d70eb64bb85ce829e4591f. > > This patch is against kernel 2.6.21 but the fix is applicable to 2.6.21 > and up. Prior to the commit

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue eepro100 removal

2007-07-02 Thread Kok, Auke
Bill Davidsen wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the overdue removal of the eepro100 driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The hardware supported by this driver is still in use, thanks. It's probably easier to leave the eepro100 driver in than find anyone who

[PATCH] [resend] IRTOUCHSYSTEMS support for usbtouchscreen

2007-07-02 Thread Ondrej Zary
Hello, this patch adds support for IRTOUCHSYSTEMS (or UNITOP) infrared touchscreens. The manufacturer (http://www.irtouch.com) provides only closed source drivers for specific kernel versions (looks like GPL violation, btw.) which I haven't even tried (as there's no chance that any of the

Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

2007-07-02 Thread Casey Schaufler
--- Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:31:49PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > It's true that the code review for AppArmor has proven difficult. > > That's going to be true of any change to the vfs layer, for any > > reason. Have someone who was there

Re: [PATCH] i386 - Fix regression, endless loop in ptrace singlestep over an int80

2007-07-02 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Jason Wessel wrote: Attached is a patch with a complete test case to fix the regression introduced by the commit: 635cf99a80f4ebee59d70eb64bb85ce829e4591f. This patch is against kernel 2.6.21 but the fix is applicable to 2.6.21 and up. Prior to the commit that introduced the regression the

[PATCH] i386 - Fix regression, endless loop in ptrace singlestep over an int80

2007-07-02 Thread Jason Wessel
Attached is a patch with a complete test case to fix the regression introduced by the commit: 635cf99a80f4ebee59d70eb64bb85ce829e4591f. This patch is against kernel 2.6.21 but the fix is applicable to 2.6.21 and up. Prior to the commit that introduced the regression the ltp ptrace tests

Re: [-mm patch] unionfs: make functions static

2007-07-02 Thread Josef Sipek
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 04:27:59AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:42:49PM -0400, Josef Sipek wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:23:30PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > This patch makes some needlessly global functions static. > > > > > ... > > > ---

[PATCH 2.6.21 2/3] x86_64 EFI64 support Try #2

2007-07-02 Thread Chandramouli Narayanan
EFI x86_64 support Patch 2 of 3 (try #2) - E820 conversion integration implemented - A way to override machine_emergency_restart is implemented so that EFI support can provide its own implementation. - The variable efi_enabled is still retained as it is

[PATCH 2.6.21 1/3] x86_64 EFI64 support Try #2

2007-07-02 Thread Chandramouli Narayanan
EFI x86_64 support Patch 1 of 3 (try #2) - Being experimental, dropped default option for CONFIG_EFI. - Implemented EFI to E820 memory map conversion. This is based on bootloader support. The ELILO bootloader x86_64 support has been updated to pass

[PATCH 2.6.21 0/3] x86_64 EFI64 support Try #2

2007-07-02 Thread Chandramouli Narayanan
-- This is Try #2 of x86_64 of EFI64 support with changes implemented based on feedback received. Details can be found in the patch files. These changes have been tested on UEFI platforms. No issues to report. Looking forward to your comments, thanks, Chandramouli Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

[PATCH 2.6.21 3/3] x86_64 EFI64 support Try #2

2007-07-02 Thread Chandramouli Narayanan
EFI x86_64 support Patch 3 of 3 (try #2) - Fixed redundant check in efifb_init(). This patch depends on the EFI x86_64 patches 1/3 and 2/3. This patch adds Graphics Output Protocol support to the kernel. x86_64 systems with UEFI2.0 firmware conform to

Re: blink driver power saving

2007-07-02 Thread Bernhard Walle
* Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-02 15:43]: > On 7/2/07, Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I was thinking about something like the atached (untested and sorry >> for using attachment). It shoudl blink just one led (numLock) on any >> keyboard that has such LED (and

Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

2007-07-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:31:49PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > It's true that the code review for AppArmor has proven difficult. > That's going to be true of any change to the vfs layer, for any > reason. Have someone who was there tell you about the original XFS > proposals some time. Again,

Re: Does the kernel HPET support has problems or the hwclock from util-linux?

2007-07-02 Thread Luca Tettamanti
rae l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > from this address, I know util-linux-2.12r is the latest: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/util-linux-2.12r.lsm > > My Dell OptiPlex 320 has 4 HPET timers and no RTC, so the execution of > hwclock has errors: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $

Re: [PATCH] retrieve VBE EDID/DDC info independent of used video mode

2007-07-02 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 06/30/2007 06:25 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Jan Beulich wrote: >> The code to retrieve this information was (a) inside a >> CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT >> section and (b) protected by a check of a variable (vbe_version) that >> would get initialized only when a VESA mode was selected on the command >>

Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume

2007-07-02 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 2 July 2007 18:36, David Greaves wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 2 July 2007 16:32, David Greaves wrote: > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Monday, 2 July 2007 12:56, Tejun Heo wrote: > David Greaves wrote: > >> Tejun Heo wrote: > >>> It's really weird

Re: mss to pmtu clamping partially broken?

2007-07-02 Thread Krzysztof Oledzki
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Phil Dibowitz wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:16:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Phil Dibowitz wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:04:12PM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: Jan Engelhardt wrote: Do you really need clamping? It's a hack, since

Re: mss to pmtu clamping partially broken?

2007-07-02 Thread Krzysztof Oledzki
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Phil Dibowitz wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:04:12PM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: Jan Engelhardt wrote: Do you really need clamping? It's a hack, since TCP should do MSS negotiation itself. (Of course it may happen that some routers are broken.) But usually not for

Re: [PATCH][XFS][resend] memory leak; allocated transaction not freed in xfs_inactive_free_eofblocks() in failure case.

2007-07-02 Thread Eric Sandeen
Jesper Juhl wrote: > (this is back from May 16 2007, resending since it doesn't look like > the patch ever made it in anywhere) > > Weird, looks like it's in cvs... http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/xfs_vnodeops.c.diff?r1=text=1.699=text=1.698=h but not in git. -Eric > Fix

Re: mss to pmtu clamping partially broken?

2007-07-02 Thread Phil Dibowitz
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:16:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:04:12PM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: >>> Jan Engelhardt wrote: Do you really need clamping? It's a hack, since TCP should do MSS

Re: [AppArmor 00/44] AppArmor security module overview

2007-07-02 Thread Casey Schaufler
--- "Eric W. Biederman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A couple of random thoughts to mix up this discussion. > > From what I have been able to observer the LSM is roughly firewalls > rules for in box operations. All it can do is increase the chances > you will get -EPERM. More likely

NIKON D50 problem

2007-07-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi! Recently I've found out that my camera NIKON D50 can't mount any more. uname -a: "Linux niam 2.6.22-rc6-cfs-v18 #6 Mon Jul 2 20:19:25 EEST 2007 i686 Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux" dmesg: scsi 2:0:0:0: Direct-Access NIKOND50 1.00 PQ: 0

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >