I've been getting this during the boot sequence for quite some time now.
They don't seem to impact the functionality of the drive any though. Just
another extra-verbose kernel message I should ignore? :)
(This is from the 2.4.1-pre10 btw.)
hdd: CD-ROM TW 120D, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hdd:
I gave it a whirl. Sadly, no change.
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
My gut tells me that this is the 'get last written' command, and even
with the quiet flag we get the IDE error status printed. Could you
try and add
goto use_toc;
add the top of
This is 2.4.4 with the aic7xxx driver version 6.1.13 dropped in.
The oops got eaten by klogd, my apologies, but it seems sane even so.
I haven't tried newer -ac or -pre kernels so I'm sure it's probably
already fixed there but just in case it isn't...
kdm[350]: Server for display :0 terminated
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 78626970
this appears to be some sort of DMA-corruption or other memory scribble
problem. hexa 78626970 is ASCII pibx, which shows in the direction of
some sort of disk-related DMA corruption.
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
It could be timer-list corruption. Someone released some memory
which had a live timer in it. The memory got recycled and then
the timer list traversal fell over it.
Well I do have another oops now (artsd this time). Once again it's in
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Adam J. Richter wrote:
1 : a group, body, or mass composed of many distinct parts
or individuals
2 a : the collecting of units or parts into a mass or whole
b : the condition of being so collected
You have to argue that absolutely
This bug, which I posted about earlier tonight, appears to be resolved by
Rik van Riel's latest vm patch (www.surriel.com/patches/2.4.0-t9p7-vmpatch)
although I can't be certain. But prior to the patch I could trigger the
BUG quite easily with a kernel compile or such and I have been compiling
Linksys LNE version 4, 00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Bridgecom, Inc:
Unknown device 0985 (rev 11)
[...]
Nov 28 04:04:52 twoey kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Nov 28 04:04:52 twoey kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out, status fc664010,
CSR12 , resetting...
I can
I'm not (yet) a kernel guru, so just point and laugh if I'm wrong, but...
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Dan Aloni wrote:
- if (!--de-count) {
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(de-count)) {
Doesn't this reverse the sense of the test?
-Jacob
--
"My my, the cruelest lies are
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Dan Aloni wrote:
If you are right, I guess put_files_struct() of kernel/exit.c would
have cleaned files_struct everytime someones called it.
Everywhere in the kernel, objects are freed when
atomic_dec_and_test() returns true.
Indeed, after studying the asm in question
Well, I guess I should chip in here with the rather amusing fact that
2.4.4 is the first kernel *not* to do this to me... ;-)
I am, of course, glad to help out testing stuff if needed. My card is
also a LinkSys LNE100TX v4.1, which the tulip driver identifies as an
ADMtek Comet rev 17
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
^
Preferred by whom? The FSF? Richard Stallman? Hackers in general when
they take a vote? Programmers in general? What if the market is
Speaking as a Linux _USER_, if this happens, can I get said print
engine working on my ARM machines with these closed source drivers?
Can Alpha users get this print system working? Can Sparc uses
get it working? What? I can't? They can't? Well, its no good to
me nor them. You've just
Oh Great Gurus:
I have an agp video card that seems quite picky about interrupts, and a
bios that is insisting on sharing the video card's interrupt with whatever
is in the first pci slot. So my question is, is there any way for the
kernel to more or less say ``screw you'' to the bios and pick
This is 2.4.4 with the aic7xxx driver version 6.1.13 dropped in.
The oops got eaten by klogd, my apologies, but it seems sane even so.
I haven't tried newer -ac or -pre kernels so I'm sure it's probably
already fixed there but just in case it isn't...
kdm[350]: Server for display :0 terminated
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 78626970
> this appears to be some sort of DMA-corruption or other memory scribble
> problem. hexa 78626970 is ASCII "pibx", which shows in the direction of
> some sort of disk-related DMA
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It could be timer-list corruption. Someone released some memory
> which had a live timer in it. The memory got recycled and then
> the timer list traversal fell over it.
Well I do have another oops now (artsd this time). Once again it's in
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> 1 : a group, body, or mass composed of many distinct parts
> or individuals
> 2 a : the collecting of units or parts into a mass or whole
> b : the condition of being so collected
>
> You have to argue that
I've been getting this during the boot sequence for quite some time now.
They don't seem to impact the functionality of the drive any though. Just
another extra-verbose kernel message I should ignore? :)
(This is from the 2.4.1-pre10 btw.)
hdd: CD-ROM TW 120D, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hdd:
I gave it a whirl. Sadly, no change.
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
> My gut tells me that this is the 'get last written' command, and even
> with the quiet flag we get the IDE error status printed. Could you
> try and add
>
> goto use_toc;
>
> add the top of
Well, I guess I should chip in here with the rather amusing fact that
2.4.4 is the first kernel *not* to do this to me... ;-)
I am, of course, glad to help out testing stuff if needed. My card is
also a LinkSys LNE100TX v4.1, which the tulip driver identifies as an
ADMtek Comet rev 17
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
^
Preferred by whom? The FSF? Richard Stallman? Hackers in general when
they take a vote? Programmers in general? What if the market is
> > Linksys LNE version 4, 00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Bridgecom, Inc:
> > Unknown device 0985 (rev 11)
[...]
> > Nov 28 04:04:52 twoey kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> > Nov 28 04:04:52 twoey kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out, status fc664010,
> > CSR12 , resetting...
This bug, which I posted about earlier tonight, appears to be resolved by
Rik van Riel's latest vm patch (www.surriel.com/patches/2.4.0-t9p7-vmpatch)
although I can't be certain. But prior to the patch I could trigger the
BUG quite easily with a kernel compile or such and I have been compiling
I'm not (yet) a kernel guru, so just point and laugh if I'm wrong, but...
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Dan Aloni wrote:
> - if (!--de->count) {
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(>count)) {
Doesn't this reverse the sense of the test?
-Jacob
--
"My my, the cruelest lies are
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Dan Aloni wrote:
> If you are right, I guess put_files_struct() of kernel/exit.c would
> have cleaned files_struct everytime someones called it.
> Everywhere in the kernel, objects are freed when
> atomic_dec_and_test() returns true.
Indeed, after studying the asm in
> Speaking as a Linux _USER_, if this happens, can I get said print
> engine working on my ARM machines with these closed source drivers?
> Can Alpha users get this print system working? Can Sparc uses
> get it working? What? I can't? They can't? Well, its no good to
> me nor them. You've
Oh Great Gurus:
I have an agp video card that seems quite picky about interrupts, and a
bios that is insisting on sharing the video card's interrupt with whatever
is in the first pci slot. So my question is, is there any way for the
kernel to more or less say ``screw you'' to the bios and pick
28 matches
Mail list logo
