On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/dma/dw_dmac.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:31:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
I would suggest adding a commit log, but if maintainer is fine without,
I'm fine too :-p
Should be there. But i am bored of giving this review comment now :)
--
(
if (min != policy.cpuinfo.min_freq ||
max != policy.cpuinfo.max_freq)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-}
+ }
Apart from that:
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On 16 October 2012 17:14, hongbo.zhang hongbo.zh...@linaro.org wrote:
From: hongbo.zhang hongbo.zh...@linaro.com
The cpufreq works as a cooling device, so the cooling layer should
check and wait until the cpufreq driver is initialized.
Idea is good.
Signed-off-by: hongbo.zhang
On 16 October 2012 17:14, hongbo.zhang hongbo.zh...@linaro.org wrote:
From: hongbo.zhang hongbo.zh...@linaro.com
This diver is based on the thermal management framework in thermal_sys.c.
A thermal zone device is created with the trip points to which cooling
devices can be bound, the current
On 17 October 2012 22:28, Joe Perches j...@perches.com wrote:
+#include linux/slab.h
+#include linux/module.h
+#include linux/platform_device.h
+#include linux/cpufreq.h
+#include linux/cpu_cooling.h
+#include linux/err.h
should be in alphabetical order
There's no agreed kernel
On 18 October 2012 13:05, Hongbo Zhang hongbo.zh...@linaro.org wrote:
On 17 October 2012 23:23, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 16 October 2012 17:14, hongbo.zhang hongbo.zh...@linaro.org wrote:
+static struct db8500_trip_point db8500_trips_table[] = {
+ [0
Balbi)
- add a description to patch 4/6
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
= of_match_ptr(spear_pwm_of_match),
+ },
+ .probe = spear_pwm_probe,
+ .remove = __devexit_p(spear_pwm_remove),
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(spear_pwm_driver);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE(GPL);
+MODULE_AUTHOR(Shiraz Hashim shiraz.has...@st.com);
+MODULE_AUTHOR(Viresh Kumar viresh.ku
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Shiraz Hashim shiraz.has...@st.com wrote:
Is there a reason to make this conditional? It looks like SPEAr has
moved to OF, so this will always be enabled anyway, won't it?
Yes, I would remove it, SPEAr cannot boot without DT.
Add a dependency on OF in the
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 16 October 2012 17:14, hongbo.zhang hongbo.zh...@linaro.org wrote:
+static int __devinit db8500_cpufreq_cooling_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
+{
+ struct db8500_cpufreq_cdev *cooling_devs;
Hi Hongbo
It would be nice to keep spear-devel in cc, as this is the second
platform that uses this driver.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
The default values are filled to support at least mem-to-mem tests provided by
dmatest module. It makes
, struct dw_lli *lli)
+static inline void dwc_dump_lli(struct dw_dma_chan *dwc, struct dw_lli *lli)
{
dev_printk(KERN_CRIT, chan2dev(dwc-chan),
desc: s0x%llx d0x%llx l0x%llx c0x%x:%x\n,
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from
llp;/* chain to next lli */
+ u32 sar;
+ u32 dar;
+ u32 llp;/* chain to next lli */
u32 ctllo;
/* values that may get written back: */
u32 ctlhi;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar
for BCM63XX based boards
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
Viresh
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose
On 13/07/12 09:45, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
To understand it more, what does this mean? We will not support
transfers with unaligned
addresses/length to word size?
The dmatest module uses those constants to get source, destination
addresses and length of the test data aligned. On the other
On 13/07/12 11:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:56 AM, viresh kumar viresh.kum...@arm.com wrote:
I wanted to ask, will normal memcpy for anybody will work with unaligned
addresses
with this patch? I believe they will.
Hmm... I just rechecked and it seems it works without
] cpufreq: ARM big LITTLE: put DT nodes after using them
DT nodes should be put using of_node_put() to balance their usage counts. This
is not done properly in ARM's big LITTLE driver. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c | 43
DT nodes should be put using of_node_put() to balance their usage counts. This
is not done properly in ARM's big LITTLE driver. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
Hi Rafael,
These are fixes for 3.10
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c | 43
This driver isn't updated to work with latest cpufreq core updates that happened
recently. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
As original patch breaks compilation, its best to merge this patch with original
patch.
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 10
Parent node must be put after using it to balance its usage count. This was
missing in cpufreq-cpu0 driver. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers
will probably be down for one more week and so not doing any
reviews for now... I do check important mails sent directly to me though.
x--x--
From: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:43:57 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq
On 22 April 2013 05:00, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Applied to linux-pm.git/linux-next, although please check the result, because
the patchwork version of the patch wasn't quite applicable and I fixed it up
manually.
Yes it looks fine and that's why i have attached the patch with my
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Zhao Chenhui
chenhui.z...@freescale.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mpc85xx-cpufreq.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/mpc85xx-cpufreq.c
+#include linux/module.h
+#include linux/cpufreq.h
+#include linux/of_platform.h
+#include linux/suspend.h
+#include
On 10 April 2013 00:00, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:00:59PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT
+static bool wq_power_efficient = 0;
+module_param_named(power_efficient, wq_power_efficient, bool, 0444);
+#endif
I don't think we need
On 9 April 2013 14:05, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:16, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 April 2013 18:24, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Benjamin
Hi Stratos,
On 4 April 2013 05:00, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
I tried to do some measurements simulating a CPU load with a loop that simply
counts
an integer. The first test simulates a CPU load that lasts 2 x sampling_rate
= ~ 2us.
The second ~4us and the third
On 4 April 2013 10:48, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-imx/cpufreq.c between commits b43a7ffbf33b (cpufreq:
Notify all policy-cpus in cpufreq_notify_transition()) and eb2f50ff93f0
(cpufreq: drivers:
On 3 April 2013 16:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 15:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 31 March 2013 09:33, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Benjamin/Paul/Olof,
Any comments on this?
Ping!!
I'm on vacation until end of April
On 4 April 2013 12:17, stratosk strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
Why do you suspect significant increased power? With ondemand the CPU will
go down to lowest freq as soon as the load will decreased. And the
measurement shows that the CPU load will decrease faster (because of faster
Hi Linus,
On 25 March 2013 15:41, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based integrator platform to
drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Russell King li...@arm.linux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/Kconfig
On 4 April 2013 15:08, Arnd Bergmann arnd.bergm...@linaro.org wrote:
Whole series
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
Thanks.
but please post them another time with linux-arm-kernel on Cc.
Yes, my fault.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
earlier version:
- Additional patch 18/18
Viresh Kumar (18):
cpufreq: ARM: Arrange drivers in alphabetical order
cpufreq: tegra: Move driver to drivers/cpufreq
cpufreq: davinci: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
cpufreq: pxa3xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
cpufreq: pxa2xx: move
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based tegra platform to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Tested-by: Stephen Warren swar
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based davinci platform to
drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com
Cc: davinci-linux-open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based pxa3xx platform to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Eric Miao eric.y.m...@gmail.com
Cc: Haojian Zhuang haojian.zhu...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Eric Miao eric.y.m...@gmail.com
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based pxa2xx platform to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Eric Miao eric.y.m...@gmail.com
Cc: Haojian Zhuang haojian.zhu...@gmail.com
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Eric Miao eric.y.m...@gmail.com
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based integrator platform to
drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Russell King li...@arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall
This patch moves cpufreq driver of Samsung's ARM based s3c24xx platform to
drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Ben Dooks ben-li...@fluff.org
Cc: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Cc: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
This patch moves cpufreq driver of ARM based sa11x0 platform to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Russell King li...@arm.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
---
arch/arm/Kconfig
This patch moves cpufreq driver of AVR32 based at32ap platform to
drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: hans-christian.egtv...@atmel.com
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen hskinnem...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt egtv...@samfundet.no
---
arch/avr32/Kconfig
This patch moves cpufreq driver of IA64 architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Tony Luck tony.l...@intel.com
Cc: Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com
Cc: linux-i...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Tony Luck tony.l...@intel.com
---
arch/ia64/Kconfig
This patch moves cpufreq driver of MIPS architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Ralf Baechle r...@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-m...@linux-mips.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org
---
arch/mips/Kconfig | 9
This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org
---
arch/sh/Kconfig| 18
This patch moves cpufreq driver of UNICORE-2 architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Guan Xuetao g...@mprc.pku.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Guan Xuetao g...@mprc.pku.edu.cn
---
arch/unicore32/kernel/Makefile | 1
This patch moves cpufreq driver of SPARC architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net
Cc: sparcli...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net
---
arch/sparc/Kconfig
This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Cc: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
Compile
This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platforms/cell to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
Compile Tested only.
arch/powerpc/platforms
This patch moves cpufreq drivers of CRIS architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Jesper Nilsson jesper.nils...@axis.com
Cc: Mikael Starvik star...@axis.com
Cc: linux-cris-ker...@axis.com
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson jesper.nils...@axis.com
---
arch
This patch moves cpufreq driver of BLACKFIN architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
Cc: uclinux-dist-de...@blackfin.uclinux.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Steven Miao real...@gmail.com
---
arch/blackfin/mach-common/Makefile
Normally we keep drivers in alphabetical inside Kconfig and Makefile and over
time this was broken for ARM cpufreq drivers. Fix it.
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Tested-by: Stephen Warren
On 4 April 2013 18:32, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
Moving the files is good, but I don't see a reason to make the cbe_cpufreq.h
header globally visible in include/linux/. Isn't it just used by as the
interface between ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c and ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c?
When i moved it
covert the cpufreq_data_lock to a rwlock
v7: Rebase to use the already accepted half
v8: Correct have_governor_per_policy
Reviewed location of rcu_read_(un)lock in several spots
Sorry for long delay or too many versions of this patch :)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
On 4 April 2013 21:49, Jacob Shin jacob.s...@amd.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+static void od_set_powersave_bias(unsigned int powersave_bias)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu;
+ struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners;
+
+
On 5 April 2013 04:06, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Thursday, April 04, 2013 06:24:08 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Rafael,
These are all the remaining patches i have for 3.10. All of them have
received
Acks from their maintainers leaving powerpc ones. I have got an additional
/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
For the latest versions sent by you (including {get|put}_online_cpus()):
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
/core.c |4 ++--
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:05 PM, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dirk Brandewie dirk.brande...@gmail.com
The current calculation of the delay time is wrong and a cut and paste
error from a previous experimental driver. This can result in the
timeout being set to jiffies + 1 which
On 4 April 2013 18:24, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Cc: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
Cc: linuxppc
On 5 April 2013 10:19, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
For the latest versions sent by you (including {get|put}_online_cpus()):
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Hi Rafael,
I see that you have applied this patchset to bleeding-edge, but in
wrong order. You have
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
should be sent to upstream via samsung tree.
Hmm... Its already applied in
On 4 April 2013 03:24, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Not a call, probably a module_param() so that it can be switched
on/off during boot. You can make the param writable so that it can be
flipped run-time but updating existing workqueues would be non-trivial
and I don't think it's gonna be
On 31 March 2013 09:16, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 31 March 2013 07:16, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Sunday, March 31, 2013 07:03:04 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 31 March 2013 03:31, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Sorry, I won't apply this. It changes too
On 5 April 2013 16:15, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
OK
Please resend it after v3.10-rc1 and I'll take it for v3.11. Surely, it can
wait for that long.
For sure. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
sched_domains_numa_distance is written as sched_domains_nume_distance inside one
of the comments. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
On 5 April 2013 12:36, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
should
On 8 April 2013 13:47, Amit Daniel Kachhap amit.dan...@samsung.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index f3f3b14..bce2195 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -42,6 +42,15 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ
On 8 April 2013 14:17, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 8 April 2013 13:47, Amit Daniel Kachhap amit.dan...@samsung.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index f3f3b14..bce2195 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers
On 8 April 2013 14:45, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree.
OK, I will.
I got patch file from Viresh, and there is a sign from Rafael, but it should
be ack. So Rafael, let me use your ack on this patch
/cpufreq/cpufreq-exynos5440.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
With the resent of 1/4,
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
On 17 December 2012 11:12, Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
They do not _have_ to be non-inline, I think we should simply drop the
first 2 patches and I will refresh and ressend the 3rd one.
I haven't seen this patch since a long time? Any updates?
--
To unsubscribe from this
On 5 April 2013 17:52, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
module_param()?? We can't compile kernel/workqueue.c as a module and
hence i went with #define + a variable with functions to set/reset it...
module_param works
On 4 April 2013 03:24, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Not a call, probably a module_param() so that it can be switched
on/off during boot. You can make the param writable so that it can be
flipped run-time but updating existing workqueues would be non-trivial
and I don't think it's gonna be
On 8 April 2013 16:43, Jens Axboe ax...@kernel.dk wrote:
And lets please have it off by default. The specialized configs / setups
can turn it on, but we should default to better performance.
Yes, we will.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On 8 April 2013 22:29, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Looks like Amit was left off the patch 0, and missed the power savings
explanation that you did there. Perhaps you should have included that in
each patch change log.
He isn't supposed to miss any of my emails, he is my manager
to get this done and want to get that a some review
before touching other drivers and spamming LKML with other patches :)
Here it is:
From: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:45:40 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] workqueues: Introduce new flag WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT for power
On 5 April 2013 12:16, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 4 April 2013 18:24, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
On 9 April 2013 14:48, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
+config WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT
+ bool Workqueue allocated as UNBOUND for power efficiency
Mostly good now, V5 should be the final one.
On 9 April 2013 14:02, yuantian.t...@freescale.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc-corenet-cpufreq.c
+static int corenet_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int
On 9 April 2013 15:23, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Later one (Power oriented WQ) can be achieved if the workqueue is allocated
with
Rephrase as Power-efficient workqueues can be achieved...
Ok
On 9 April 2013 15:28, Amit Kucheria amit.kuche...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
But how will we know if the user of wq wants to save power or not? He must
give some flag which is only used when power saving is enabled. We can't
On 9 April 2013 16:07, Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Jonghwa Lee
Our approach is a bit different than cpufreq_ondemand one. Ondemand
takes the per CPU idle time, then on that basis calculates per cpu load.
The next step is to choose the highest
On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
Why?
I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies.
Hi Simon,
The idea
[Steven replied to a personal Ping!!, including everybody again]
On 9 April 2013 19:25, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 14:05 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Ping!!
Remind me again. What problem are you trying to solve?
I was trying to migrate a running timer
On 9 April 2013 19:34, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
I have seen it on reboots.
How to online/offline from sysfs?
offline a cpu x with:
echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online
and online with echo 1 to same location.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On 9 April 2013 19:33, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:47:39 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
On reboot I see hanging cpufreq with the help of kdb/kgdb?
See screenshot.
I have also a screenshot with next-20130326, so this issue seems not to be
new.
This is during
On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
With x=3 the system gets in an unuseable state.
root# echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online
I could not write my reply and had to do a hard/cold reboot.
The dmesg log I saw looked similiar to my digicam-shot.
Few
On 10 April 2013 07:42, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
Thanks, I understand.
I have no objections to this, but Paul should probably review it.
It is already Acked by him and applied by Rafael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On 9 April 2013 22:26, Stratos Karafotis strat...@semaphore.gr wrote:
On 04/05/2013 10:50 PM, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
Hi Viresh,
On 04/04/2013 07:54 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Stratos,
Yes, your results show some improvements. BUT if performance is the only
thing
we were looking
On 11 April 2013 12:29, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
That's not very nice this late in the staging cycle. Give the powerpc
guys a little more time than a single day to come back with test results,
please.
Yes we are waiting indefinitely for an Ack from powerpc guys.. If we can
get a
by policy.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index fd97a62..3564947 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq
On 10 April 2013 11:44, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
I found this [RFC PATCH] kbuild: Build linux-tools package with 'make
deb-pkg' from February 2012.
Can't say what happened to it...
Sedat,
Sorry for being late. I am down with Fever and throat infection since few days.
Still
On 28 March 2013 23:43, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Ping. Peter, Ingo?
Thanks for your ping, even i was thinking of it since sometime :)
Viresh, would it be difficult to make another measurement of the same
workload with the said workqueues converted to unbound? I think that
would at
/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
/config
options.
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar manjunath.gou...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.li...@gmail.com
This version has changed from what i Acked, but it still looks fine.
Thanks
On 28 March 2013 23:43, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Viresh, would it be difficult to make another measurement of the same
workload with the said workqueues converted to unbound? I think that
would at least provide a nice reference point.
My heart is shattered after getting the results :)
.
Following are the new definitions of these variables:
Related_cpus: All (Online Offline) CPUs that run at the same hardware
frequency.
Affected_cpus: Online CPUs that run at the same hardware frequency.
Above definitions are more consistent with latest cpufreq core code.
Signed-off-by: Viresh
On 29 March 2013 23:10, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
So the scheduler does know what it's doing after all, which is a nice
news. Given the result, the best thing to do would be somehow marking
these workqueues as unbound for powersaving?
Yes. I am going to do it soon.
--
To unsubscribe
201 - 300 of 16408 matches
Mail list logo
