/rt/4.19/patch-4.19.72-
>rt25.patch.xz
>
Unfortunately, this does not work for the pi3-4 family. When its all
pulled in and patched, there is no arch/arm/configs bcm2709_defconfig or
bcm2711_defconfig for either a pi3b or the new pi4b.
I'll go find the 5.2.14 announce and see if its any
On Monday 07 October 2019 15:10:05 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 16 September 2019 17:39:21 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Dear RT Folks,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce the 4.19.72-rt25 stable release.
> >
> >
> >
> > As you probably
hlon64 X2. Which of those two files is the correct one
for this cpu?
Please include me in the reply as I am not subscribed, and resubscribe
attempts are apparently sent to /dev/null, I never get the reply's.
Thank you very much.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be u
. Which of those two files is the correct one
for this cpu?
Please include me in the reply as I am not subscribed, and resubscribe
attempts are apparently sent to /dev/null, I never get the reply's.
Thank you very much.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty
On Saturday 25 April 2015 19:13:10 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:07:52PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 24 April 2015 11:58:31 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > From: Chris Metcalf
> > >
> > > nohz_full is only useful wit
On Saturday 25 April 2015 19:13:10 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:07:52PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 24 April 2015 11:58:31 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
From: Chris Metcalf cmetc...@ezchip.com
nohz_full is only useful with isolcpus also set, since
ct without isolating the cpus. */
> + tick_nohz_full_add_cpus_to(cpu_isolated_map);
> +
> sched_init_numa();
>
> /*
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author
, GFP_KERNEL);
alloc_cpumask_var(fallback_doms, GFP_KERNEL);
+ /* nohz_full won't take effect without isolating the cpus. */
+ tick_nohz_full_add_cpus_to(cpu_isolated_map);
+
sched_init_numa();
/*
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense
otify_destroy(struct inotify_handle *ih);
>-
>- void get_inotify_watch(struct inotify_watch *watch);
>- void put_inotify_watch(struct inotify_watch *watch);
>-
>-
>-(v) Internal Kernel Implementation
>+(iii) Internal Kernel Implementation
>
> Each inotify instance
.
As a heavy user of the inotify kit of utils, inotify_wait in particular, I
object if this removal breaks those tools.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page
On Thursday 01 January 2015, rh_ wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Dec 2014 09:16:57 -0500
>
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings;
>>
>> Usually, when I build a new kernel, just placing a copy of an older
>> versions .config in the unpacked src directory is sufficient that
On Thursday 01 January 2015, rh_ wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2014 09:16:57 -0500
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Greetings;
Usually, when I build a new kernel, just placing a copy of an older
versions .config in the unpacked src directory is sufficient that
only what has been changed has
every item in a 28k .config file
from build to build, so what am I doing wrong that is destroying this
continuity?
Thanks everybody.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershe
every item in a 28k .config file
from build to build, so what am I doing wrong that is destroying this
continuity?
Thanks everybody.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author
e on
this *buntu 10.04.4 LTS box, but haven't located a URL to get the tarball
from. Yet, its been busy here.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page
to get the tarball
from. Yet, its been busy here.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene
US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014
w, and systemd.
[huge snip of non-contributory blather]
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
US V Castleman,
blather]
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene
US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014 is grounds for Impeaching SCOTUS
, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014 is grounds for Impeaching SCOTUS
--
To
, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene
US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014 is grounds for Impeaching SCOTUS
--
To unsubscribe from this list
example, then
>the modules directory of the first one will be overwritten unwanted due
>to this version error because both kernels have the same modules
>directory "/lib/modules/3.16.0".
I got bit by that when I built the tarball of 3.1.6.0 the first time, it
all went into 3.16
directory /lib/modules/3.16.0.
I got bit by that when I built the tarball of 3.1.6.0 the first time, it
all went into 3.16. The .0 was missing in the tarballs Makefile. And,
that is how it unpacked from the tarball too.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty
t; --
>> Regards,
>> Christopher Barry
>>
>> Random geeky fortune:
>> BOFH excuse #202:
>>
>> kernel panic: write-only-memory (/dev/wom0) capacity exceeded.
>
>--
>Vlad Glagolev
>--
I don't normally do much in the me too dept. But these t
too to this rant.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene
US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014 is grounds for Impeaching SCOTUS
On Thursday 07 August 2014, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>On 2014ه¹´08وœˆ06و—¥ 21:57, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 06 August 2014, Lan, Tianyu wrote:
>>> Have you tried my attached kernel config file? When someone reported
>>> the issue to me, I also was very hard to reprod
On Thursday 07 August 2014, Lan Tianyu wrote:
On 2014ه¹´08وœˆ06و—¥ 21:57, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 06 August 2014, Lan, Tianyu wrote:
Have you tried my attached kernel config file? When someone reported
the issue to me, I also was very hard to reproduce the issue by my
own config file
~20msec.
>
>I don't know whether it is the dual core or AMD but your patch doesn't
>change anything on that laptop which is ok, I'd guess.
>
>> Ok. BTW, I have tested it on the Ivbridge and Haswell machines.
>
>Yeah, add those numbers to the commit message too.
>
>Thanks.
guess.
Ok. BTW, I have tested it on the Ivbridge and Haswell machines.
Yeah, add those numbers to the commit message too.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense
On Sunday 06 April 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 13:31 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> and/or changing MOUSE_APPLETOUCH to depend on USB instead of select it?
>
>MOUSE_APPLETOUCH selects USB and depends on USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD. That's
>actually quite a common pattern.
>
>But what is the
On Sunday 06 April 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 13:31 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
and/or changing MOUSE_APPLETOUCH to depend on USB instead of select it?
MOUSE_APPLETOUCH selects USB and depends on USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD. That's
actually quite a common pattern.
But what is the purpose
On Sunday 02 March 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 09:56:19PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > (BTW, would it be possible to transform Linux's PAE support into
> > boot-config or even fully runtime-detectable boot switching to
> > (non-)PAE, similar to or exceeding what XP offers
On Sunday 02 March 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings;
>>
>> Something is stuck in a loop someplace and I am now being bombarded by
>> reject messages from:
>>
>> Hi. This is the qmail-send program a
-Level: +
Received: from unknown (HELO coyote.localnet)
(ghesk...@wdtv.com@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)
by mail.wdtv.com with SMTP; 23 Feb 2014 09:12:26 -0500
From: Gene Heskett
To: Mike Galbraith
Subject: Re: It BOOTS! 3.13.5 that is.
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:12:18 -0500
Cc: Ilia Mirkin ,
"linux-k
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0
X-Spam-Level: +
Received: from unknown (HELO coyote.localnet)
(ghesk...@wdtv.com@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)
by mail.wdtv.com with SMTP; 23 Feb 2014 09:12:26 -0500
From: Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
To: Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de
Subject: Re: It BOOTS
On Sunday 02 March 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Greetings;
Something is stuck in a loop someplace and I am now being bombarded by
reject messages from:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.wdtv.com.
I'm afraid I
On Sunday 02 March 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 09:56:19PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
(BTW, would it be possible to transform Linux's PAE support into
boot-config or even fully runtime-detectable boot switching to
(non-)PAE, similar to or exceeding what XP offers with its
On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 03:45 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:26:35AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > I would start with strace to see if a task is looping in userspace,
>> > then move on to perf top -g -p (or perf
On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 03:45 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:26:35AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
I would start with strace to see if a task is looping in userspace,
then move on to perf top -g -p pid (or perf
On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Ken Moffat wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:26:35AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> I would start with strace to see if a task is looping in userspace,
>> then move on to perf top -g -p (or perf record/report) to peek
>> at what it's up to in the kernel. Once you
On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Ken Moffat wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:28:29PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>> I don't have any help to offer Ken, but this walks and quacks much like
>> a duck I'm encountering
On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Ken Moffat wrote:
>Hi,
>
> Short summary : on 3.13.5, rm -rf of an application source
>directory on an ext4 filesystem sometimes takes forever (probably
>isn't going anywhere), with one CPU pegged at all-but 100% utilization.
>
> I've nearly finished building a new
On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Ken Moffat wrote:
Hi,
Short summary : on 3.13.5, rm -rf of an application source
directory on an ext4 filesystem sometimes takes forever (probably
isn't going anywhere), with one CPU pegged at all-but 100% utilization.
I've nearly finished building a new system
On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:28:29PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Ken Moffat wrote:
I don't have any help to offer Ken, but this walks and quacks much like
a duck I'm encountering in 3.13.5, with the backup program
On Wednesday 26 February 2014, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:26:35AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
I would start with strace to see if a task is looping in userspace,
then move on to perf top -g -p pid (or perf record/report) to peek
at what it's up to in the kernel. Once you
On Sunday 23 February 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Sunday 23 February 2014, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 00:18 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, no such beast As VIDEO_CX88.
On Sunday 23 February 2014, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 00:18 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, no such beast As VIDEO_CX88.
>>
>> Now that tells me something in the VIDEO dept isn't set
On Sunday 23 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
>>>> On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wr
On Sunday 23 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
wrote:
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat
On Sunday 23 February 2014, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 00:18 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Sorry, no such beast As VIDEO_CX88.
Now that tells me something in the VIDEO dept isn't set, but what?
Beast radar:
find drivers -name
On Sunday 23 February 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 23 February 2014, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 00:18 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Sorry, no such beast As VIDEO_CX88.
Now that tells me something in the VIDEO dept isn't
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
>>>> On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wr
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>> But my tv card isn't being found by kaffeine.
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> But my tv card isn't being found by kaffeine. It is this card:
>>
>> 01:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Conexant Systems, Inc.
>> CX23880/1/2/3 PCI Vide
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> But my tv card isn't being found by kaffeine. It is this card:
>>
>> 01:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Conexant Systems, Inc.
>> CX23880/1/2/3 PCI Vide
But my tv card isn't being found by kaffeine. It is this card:
01:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Conexant Systems, Inc. CX23880/1/2/3 PCI
Video and Audio Decoder (rev 05)
Subsystem: pcHDTV Device 3000
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 10
Memory at
But my tv card isn't being found by kaffeine. It is this card:
01:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Conexant Systems, Inc. CX23880/1/2/3 PCI
Video and Audio Decoder (rev 05)
Subsystem: pcHDTV Device 3000
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 10
Memory at
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
But my tv card isn't being found by kaffeine. It is this card:
01:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Conexant Systems, Inc.
CX23880/1/2/3 PCI Video and Audio Decoder (rev 05
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
But my tv card isn't being found by kaffeine. It is this card:
01:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Conexant Systems, Inc.
CX23880/1/2/3 PCI Video and Audio Decoder (rev 05
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
But my tv card isn't being found by kaffeine
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
wrote:
On Saturday 22 February 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote
I finally found a keyboard I can use when the boots fails to the
initramfs: prompt. ps2 plug on it.
>From the messages it leaves on screen, it is NOT finding the drive plugged
into the mobo SATA1 connector when I try to boot to a 3.13.1-2-3 kernel.
So just to verify I am looking in the right
I finally found a keyboard I can use when the boots fails to the
initramfs: prompt. ps2 plug on it.
From the messages it leaves on screen, it is NOT finding the drive plugged
into the mobo SATA1 connector when I try to boot to a 3.13.1-2-3 kernel.
So just to verify I am looking in the right
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 Randy Dunlap did write:
Lets start with a clean slate here. See the image from trying to boot
a 3.13.3 made from the repaired 3.12.9 .config file via an edit to
re-enable the missing media stuffs followed by a make oldconfig.
Fresh boot pix, not as well focused
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 Randy Dunlap did write:
Lets start with a clean slate here. See the image from trying to boot
a 3.13.3 made from the repaired 3.12.9 .config file via an edit to
re-enable the missing media stuffs followed by a make oldconfig.
Fresh boot pix, not as well focused
On Friday 14 February 2014, Larry Finger wrote:
>On 02/14/2014 12:42 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 02/14/2014 08:31 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Which is required for my $290 ASUS M2n-SLI Deluxe motherboard to boot.
>>>
>>> Not finding the option in any
Which is required for my $290 ASUS M2n-SLI Deluxe motherboard to boot.
Not finding the option in any kernel tree that exists on my system,
except it appears its been replaced or something.
This once in a lifetime boot, to 3.12.9, shows from an lsmod:
libata146855 2
Which is required for my $290 ASUS M2n-SLI Deluxe motherboard to boot.
Not finding the option in any kernel tree that exists on my system,
except it appears its been replaced or something.
This once in a lifetime boot, to 3.12.9, shows from an lsmod:
libata146855 2
On Friday 14 February 2014, Larry Finger wrote:
On 02/14/2014 12:42 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/14/2014 08:31 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Which is required for my $290 ASUS M2n-SLI Deluxe motherboard to boot.
Not finding the option in any kernel tree that exists on my system,
except it appears
On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On 02/12/2014 11:08 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
>>
>> So I unpacked 3.13.2 this morning and copied its
>> arch/x86/i386_defconfig to .config.
>>
&
On Thursday 13 February 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>On 02/12/2014 11:08 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
>>>
>>> So I unpacked 3.13.2 this
On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On 02/12/2014 11:08 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
>>
>> So I unpacked 3.13.2 this morning and copied its
>> arch/x86/i386_defconfig to .config.
>>
&
On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/12/2014 11:08 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
So I unpacked 3.13.2 this morning and copied its
arch/x86/i386_defconfig to .config.
Ran make oldconfig, then 3 or 4 sessions
On Thursday 13 February 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/12/2014 11:08 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
So I unpacked 3.13.2 this morning and copied its
arch/x86/i386_defconfig to .config
On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/12/2014 11:08 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
So I unpacked 3.13.2 this morning and copied its
arch/x86/i386_defconfig to .config.
Ran make oldconfig, then 3 or 4 sessions
On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On 02/12/2014 11:08 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
>>
>> So I unpacked 3.13.2 this morning and copied its
>> arch/x86/i386_defconfig to .config.
>>
&
Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
So I unpacked 3.13.2 this morning and copied its arch/x86/i386_defconfig to
.config.
Ran make oldconfig, then 3 or 4 sessions of xconfig removing stuff that
isn't for my hardware & generally making lots of modules where I wasn't
Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
So I unpacked 3.13.2 this morning and copied its arch/x86/i386_defconfig to
.config.
Ran make oldconfig, then 3 or 4 sessions of xconfig removing stuff that
isn't for my hardware generally making lots of modules where I wasn't
On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/12/2014 11:08 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings, not making any progress on newer kernel builds yet.
So I unpacked 3.13.2 this morning and copied its
arch/x86/i386_defconfig to .config.
Ran make oldconfig, then 3 or 4 sessions
On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On 02/10/2014 04:13 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 10 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2014 12:21 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>> On Monday 10 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>&g
On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>You have ext[234] filesystems builtin. I suppose the rootfs is one of
>those?
Yes, its all ext2-3-4 here (except swap of course)
>Your .config file also has the ATA drivers as =m (loadable modules), but
>I guess that you also tested with those
On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
You have ext[234] filesystems builtin. I suppose the rootfs is one of
those?
Yes, its all ext2-3-4 here (except swap of course)
Your .config file also has the ATA drivers as =m (loadable modules), but
I guess that you also tested with those
On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/10/2014 04:13 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 10 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/10/2014 12:21 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 10 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/09/2014 08:32 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
AUTOSELECT
On Monday 10 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On 02/09/2014 08:32 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>AUTOSELECT driver feature Better! ugh.
Spit. I presume geneology discussions are off topic. :)
>
>Good luck. Let me know if you need more guidance.
Hat in hand, I figured I had better g
On Monday 10 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
[...]
> Gene, I want to make sure where you are saying the problem is.
> Is it going directly from 3.019 to 3.8.2, with no intervening kernel
> versions?
No, one intermediate step in this case.
I started with 3.0.19,
On Monday 10 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
[...]
Gene, I want to make sure where you are saying the problem is.
Is it going directly from 3.019 to 3.8.2, with no intervening kernel
versions?
No, one intermediate step in this case.
I started with 3.0.19, which was fine, took that one
On Monday 10 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/09/2014 08:32 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
AUTOSELECT driver feature Better! ugh.
Spit. I presume geneology discussions are off topic. :)
Good luck. Let me know if you need more guidance.
Hat in hand, I figured I had better get the first one
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On 02/09/2014 08:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 02/09/2014 07:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>On 02/09/2014 07:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 02/09/2014 07:07 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 17:41 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> >What has this got to do with an invalid Kconfig dependency in
>> >arch/mn10300?
>>
>> Probably not
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 16:54 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> And much of it is in a bad make oldconfig that I can't date, but all of
>> the multimedia stuff has been stripped and I can no longer use my
>> pcHDTV3000 card as just one
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>Am 09.02.2014 22:35, schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>> I could understand if you would replace DEPRECATED with BROKEN,
>> but causing a potentially large number of broken builds and
>> then leave it to others to clean up the resulting mess doesn't
>>
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 09.02.2014 22:35, schrieb Guenter Roeck:
I could understand if you would replace DEPRECATED with BROKEN,
but causing a potentially large number of broken builds and
then leave it to others to clean up the resulting mess doesn't
make any
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 16:54 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
And much of it is in a bad make oldconfig that I can't date, but all of
the multimedia stuff has been stripped and I can no longer use my
pcHDTV3000 card as just one for instance. I just tested
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 17:41 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
What has this got to do with an invalid Kconfig dependency in
arch/mn10300?
Probably not much
Feel free to open a new thread, with the relevant
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/09/2014 07:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/09/2014 07:07 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/09/2014 08:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/09/2014 07:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 02/09/2014 07:07 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09
Greetings guys;
So has make oldconfig been superceeded? Or has that whole tree been
excised from the sources?
Cheers, Gene
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page
Greetings guys;
So has make oldconfig been superceeded? Or has that whole tree been
excised from the sources?
Cheers, Gene
--
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page
5482 gadget_multi.txt
>
>ls -l gadget_multi.txt
>-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5482 Dec 20 09:51 gadget_multi.txt
>
>If you size/cksum is different something modified your file
They crosscheck as identical to yours.
>
>On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 05,
On Wednesday 05 February 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:24:59PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >/home/gene/src/linux-3.2.40/Documentation/usb/gadget_multi.txt:
>> >MBL_400944.UNOFFICIAL FOUND
>>
>> You will see more history.
>>
>&g
1 - 100 of 1011 matches
Mail list logo
