Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: Add gpiolib_acpi_run_edge_events_on_boot option and blacklist

On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 07:53, Hans de Goede wrote: > > To avoid problems like this, this commit adds a new > gpiolib_acpi_run_edge_events_on_boot kernel commandline option which > can be "on", "off", or "auto" (default). > > In auto mode the default is on and a DMI based blacklist is used, > the

Re: [PATCH] Skip deferred request irqs for devices known to fail

Hi Hans and everyone, On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 04:59, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi Ian, et. al., > > As such I guess we may need to go with the blacklist patch you suggested > which sucks, but having these devices not boot sucks even harder. > > I guess this problem did not magically fix it self in

[PATCH v2] Skip deferred request irqs for devices known to fail

a...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ian W MORRISON Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 33 +++-- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.

[PATCH] Skip deferred request irqs for devices known to fail

a...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ian W MORRISON --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 28 +++- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c index 259cf6ab969b..8d855dc9b020 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/

[PATCH] Use default .cfg file name for RTL8723BS devices with id of OBDA8723

a default of for these devices. Signed-off-by: Ian W MORRISON --- drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c index 8eede1197cd2..cce422dc1b8d 100644 --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c +++ b/drivers

[PATCH] Use default .cfg file name for RTL8723BS devices with id of OBDA8723

a default of for these devices. Signed-off-by: Ian W MORRISON --- drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c index 8eede1197cd2..cce422dc1b8d 100644 --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_h5.c +++ b/drivers

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

-reviews/jtpHvZOfZ-Q). It is important to similarly include in the mainline and stable kernels to facilitate various distros that are now raising bug reports (for example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1760545). Many thanks, Ian On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 at 08:46, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmo

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

-reviews/jtpHvZOfZ-Q). It is important to similarly include in the mainline and stable kernels to facilitate various distros that are now raising bug reports (for example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1760545). Many thanks, Ian On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 at 08:46, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > On

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 21 April 2018 at 11:22, Botello Ortega, Luis wrote: > Hi all: > > We tested GLK DMC 1.04 FW in last week of September 2017, using the latest > drm-tip version for that time (4.14.0-rc2) and according to our results we > could declare this FW as acceptable and

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 21 April 2018 at 11:22, Botello Ortega, Luis wrote: > Hi all: > > We tested GLK DMC 1.04 FW in last week of September 2017, using the latest > drm-tip version for that time (4.14.0-rc2) and according to our results we > could declare this FW as acceptable and healthy to be used with kernel

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 20 April 2018 at 17:50, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows: > > What testing did you do beyond booting? Did

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 20 April 2018 at 17:50, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> I've performed backport testing and some additional analysis as follows: > > What testing did you do beyond booting? Did you run igt? > > BR, > Jani. I did some basic testin

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

t;From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] >> >>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 5:27 AM >> >>To: Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorri...@gmail.com> >> >>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>; Srivatsa, Anusha >> >><anusha.sri

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 18 April 2018 at 00:14, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-04-17 12:02:52) >> On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, "Srivatsa, Anusha" wrote: >> >>-Original Message- >> >>From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] >> >>

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 11 April 2018 at 22:27, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >>> kern

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

On 11 April 2018 at 22:27, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> >> >>> >>> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >>> kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. >>&g

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

> > NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older > kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and v4.15 kernels which I have tested with the patch. I found that earlier kernels didn't

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake

> > NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older > kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and v4.15 kernels which I have tested with the patch. I found that earlier kernels didn't

Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: put spaces around binary operators

On 14 June 2017 at 00:36, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Kernel style is to have spaces around the operators. This is staging > code so we do all the style fixes. We don't always update older drivers > but sometimes we do. No one is planning to change those drivers though >

Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: put spaces around binary operators

On 14 June 2017 at 00:36, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Kernel style is to have spaces around the operators. This is staging > code so we do all the style fixes. We don't always update older drivers > but sometimes we do. No one is planning to change those drivers though > so I guess the answer is no

Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: put spaces around binary operators

On 12 June 2017 at 20:46, Fabian Wolff wrote: > This patch adds spaces around the binary operators '-' and '+', which > is the preferred style, and reformats a pointer argument declaration > to fix a false positive "spaces preferred around that '*'" message > reported by

Re: [PATCH 1/7] staging: rtl8723bs: wifi_regd.c: put spaces around binary operators

On 12 June 2017 at 20:46, Fabian Wolff wrote: > This patch adds spaces around the binary operators '-' and '+', which > is the preferred style, and reformats a pointer argument declaration > to fix a false positive "spaces preferred around that '*'" message > reported by checkpatch.pl. > >

Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/PAT: Fix Xorg regression on CPUs that don't support PAT

On 2 June 2017 at 00:48, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/1/17 5:49 PM, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> On 31 May 2017 at 10:53, Doug Smythies <dsmyth...@telus.net> wrote: >>> Note Before: >>> I might not have the address list correct, as

Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/PAT: Fix Xorg regression on CPUs that don't support PAT

On 2 June 2017 at 00:48, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > On 6/1/17 5:49 PM, Ian W MORRISON wrote: >> On 31 May 2017 at 10:53, Doug Smythies wrote: >>> Note Before: >>> I might not have the address list correct, as I have re-created this >>> e-mail from the web page ar

Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/PAT: Fix Xorg regression on CPUs that don't support PAT

On 6/1/17 5:49 PM, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > On 31 May 2017 at 10:53, Doug Smythies <dsmyth...@telus.net> wrote: >> Note Before: >> I might not have the address list correct, as I have re-created this >> e-mail from the web page archive, having found the thread af

Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/PAT: Fix Xorg regression on CPUs that don't support PAT

On 6/1/17 5:49 PM, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > On 31 May 2017 at 10:53, Doug Smythies wrote: >> Note Before: >> I might not have the address list correct, as I have re-created this >> e-mail from the web page archive, having found the thread after bisecting the >> kernel. &

Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/PAT: Fix Xorg regression on CPUs that don't support PAT

On 31 May 2017 at 10:53, Doug Smythies wrote: > Note Before: > I might not have the address list correct, as I have re-created this > e-mail from the web page archive, having found the thread after bisecting the > kernel. > > On 2017.05.29 18:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Mikulas Patocka

Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/PAT: Fix Xorg regression on CPUs that don't support PAT

On 31 May 2017 at 10:53, Doug Smythies wrote: > Note Before: > I might not have the address list correct, as I have re-created this > e-mail from the web page archive, having found the thread after bisecting the > kernel. > > On 2017.05.29 18:50:57 -0400 (EDT) Mikulas Patocka wrote: >> On Sun, 28

Re: [PATCH v5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

On 9 May 2017 at 00:42, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What are you trying to achieve by posting this patch over and over so often? > > Version 5 look pretty go

Re: [PATCH v5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

On 9 May 2017 at 00:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > > What are you trying to achieve by posting this patch over and over so often? > > Version 5 look pretty good to me. Just stop posting it again and wait > when Greg t

[PATCH v6] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

A re-positioned call to kfree() in drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c causes a segmentation error. This patch removed the kfree() call. Fixes 6557ddfec348 ("staging: rtl8723bs: Fix various errors in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c") Signed-off-by: Ian W Morrison <ianwmorri

[PATCH v6] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

A re-positioned call to kfree() in drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c causes a segmentation error. This patch removed the kfree() call. Fixes 6557ddfec348 ("staging: rtl8723bs: Fix various errors in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c") Signed-off-by: Ian W Morrison Reviewed-b

[PATCH v5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

(version 5) has tabs rather than spaces, no wrap around, a changelog and a sign-off email. Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ian W Morrison <ianwmorri...@gmail.com> --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

[PATCH v5] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

(version 5) has tabs rather than spaces, no wrap around, a changelog and a sign-off email. Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Ian W Morrison --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211

[PATCH v4] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

(version 4) has tabs rather than spaces, no wrap around and a changelog. The patch has received one review: Patch looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ian W Morrison <linux...@linuxium.com.au> --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg8021

[PATCH v4] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

(version 4) has tabs rather than spaces, no wrap around and a changelog. The patch has received one review: Patch looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Ian W Morrison --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[PATCH v3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

(version 3) has tabs rather than spaces and no wrap around. The patch has received one review: Patch looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> Regards, Ian From: Ian W Morrison <linux...@linuxium.com.au> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:20:38 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] stagin

[PATCH v3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove re-positioned call to kfree in os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c

(version 3) has tabs rather than spaces and no wrap around. The patch has received one review: Patch looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Regards, Ian From: Ian W Morrison Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:20:38 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove a call to kfree in os_dep

Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver fixes for 4.12-rc1

On 5/6/17 11:41 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 06:00:24PM +1000, Ian W MORRISON wrote: The kernel when booted with Ubuntu 17.04 results in an unusable system however with the following patch booting is successful and the system is usable. The patch and kernel builds have been

Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver fixes for 4.12-rc1

On 5/6/17 11:41 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 06:00:24PM +1000, Ian W MORRISON wrote: The kernel when booted with Ubuntu 17.04 results in an unusable system however with the following patch booting is successful and the system is usable. The patch and kernel builds have been

Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver fixes for 4.12-rc1

hen booted with Ubuntu 17.04 results in an unusable system however with the following patch booting is successful and the system is usable. The patch and kernel builds have been tested against on an Intel Compute Stick (STCK1A32WFC model). Regards, Ian From: Ian W Morrison <linux...@linuxium.co

Re: [GIT PULL] Staging/IIO driver fixes for 4.12-rc1

results in an unusable system however with the following patch booting is successful and the system is usable. The patch and kernel builds have been tested against on an Intel Compute Stick (STCK1A32WFC model). Regards, Ian From: Ian W Morrison Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:20:38 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] staging